Once what has been passed on to us from the past has been properly understood, it is necessary to translate into
modern terms the great insights and potential of the Preventive System. It is necessary to bring uptodate the basic
principles, concepts, the original guidelines, re-interpreting on the theoretical and practical levels both the great
fundamental ideas, which we all know (the greater glory of God and the salvation of souls; living faith, strong
hope, theological-pastoral charity; the good Christian and the upright citizen; joy, study and piety; health, study
and holiness; piety, morality, culture, good manners; evangelisation and civilisation… ), and also the great
guidelines regarding method (making yourself loved before feared; reason, religion, loving kindness; father,
brother, friend; friendly approach, especially in recreation; winning over the heart; the educator “consecrated” to
the well-being of his pupils; full liberty to jump, run and make as much noise as they please …). And all of this
put to good use in the formation of the “new” young people of the XXI century, called to live and to come to
terms with a huge and unprecedented range of situations and problems, in decidedly changed times, in which the
human sciences themselves are going through a phase of critical reflection.
In particular I should like to suggest three approaches, examining more closely the first one.
1. Relaunching the “upright citizen” and the “good Christian”
In a world so profoundly changed from that of the 1800s it would be a grave mistake in both sociological and
theological terms to undertake charitable works according to narrow, local and purely pragmatic criteria,
forgetting the much wider aspects of the common good at national and international level. Here we may well
recognise that Don Bosco was certainly not in the position to do more than he actualy did. The way moral
consciousness has progressed nowadays in fact has led to a recognition of the limits of any support provision
which, forgetting the political dimension of under-development, does not succeed in having a positive influence
on the causes of poverty, or on those sinful structures from which derive the social conditions always criticised by
everyone. To think of charity only in terms of giving alms, responding to emergencies means running the risk
of operating in the realms of a “false Good Samaritan role” which, in spite of any good intentions finishes up by
becoming the expression of a poor quality of solidarity, since it operates according to development models which
favour the welfare of some while sugaring the bitter pill for others.
We may recall that in the period following the Council the words “the poverty of the Church” and the “Church of
the poor” were used in various ways, even at times contradictory, yet nevertheless we also need to remember that
we did not invent the Gospel, just as it was not us who invented its dramatic impact on politics and the economy.
Faith makes its mark in history yet cannot be reduced to it. If love for one’s neighbour is not the whole of the
Christian message, can one really deny that it is central and essential to it?
It has been said and written that faced with the modern State which has taken upon itself the welfare and social
assistance of its citizens, the Church no longer has the opening or opportunity for charitable and assistance work
that it used to have in the past. However, the reality of the situation nowadays shows how false such an hypothesis
fostered by secular and political voices really is. Very often the Church is once again the point of reference even
within the heart of the Welfare state. For many years we have heard it said that charitable and assistance work
were old-fashioned and out-of-date means, that were no longer of any use in modern society and in the
democratic state. But today, even in secular circles, the social role of Christian voluntary service is recognised, the
so-called third, non-profit, sector – those initiatives which originate in the parishes, in the associations, in
institutions, in local churches …
Should not the fact that nowadays hundreds of millions of people are living in conditions far removed from that
“civilzation of love,” hoped and prayed for by Pope Paul VI and repeated by his successors, find in us “a direct
response” in our turning to the formula of Don Bosco, that of the “upright citizen and the good Christian”?
With regard to the “upright citizen,” we need to reflect very seriously. Above all, at the speculative level, we need
to include in our thinking everything related to development issues - human, juvenile, working class, while at the
same time paying attention to the various relevant considerations from the philosophical-anthropological,
theological, scientific, historical, methodological points of view. This reflection then needs to take a practical
shape on the level of experience and practical reflection on the part of individuals and of communities. Here I
should like to recall that for the Salesians of Don Bosco, a very significant General Chapter, the GC 23, had
indicated as important for the areas and objectives of education the “social dimension of charity” and “the
education of the young to a commitment and to participation in public life,“ “a sector we have somewhat
overlooked or disowned” (cf. GC 23, numbers 203-210-212-214).