DIREZIONE GENERALE OPERE DON BOSCO |
1 |
▲back to top |
2 Via della Pisana 1111 - 00163 ROMA |
▲back to top |
2.1 The General Councillor for Formation |
▲back to top |
THE SALESIAN BROTHER TODAY
“CONSECRATED LAY SALESIAN”
Dear Salesian brothers, confreres, members of the Salesian Family and friends:
In the run-up to this Seminar, the organizers conducted a questionnaire among the Salesian brothers of the East Asia - Oceania Region. Your Regional Councillor, Fr. Vaclav Klement, showed me your replies to the questionnaire and asked me if I could take it upon myself to respond to the many questions you raised.
I have gladly accepted, and I sincerely hope that my responses will help, at least in some measure, to dispel your doubts and give you a clearer understanding and appreciation of the vocation of a Salesian brother. I have your questions in mind while I address these words to you.
The questions you have asked are serious ones and deserve respect. They reflect a strong desire to have a deeper sense of your identity as Salesian brothers, a greater sense of relevance in the Church and in the modern world, and a more profound sense of commitment to your vocation. You want convincing answers and I shall try my best to provide them.
Broadly speaking, your questions revolve around the identity and role of the Salesian brother: who he is and what he does, and what differentiates him from the Christian layman and the priest. I shall limit myself to dealing with these questions. I shall leave others to deal with your questions concerning the brother’s formation and vocation promotion.
Three words define the identity of a brother. He is a “consecrated lay Salesian”, and in those three words you have the richness of his vocation as well as the distinctive elements that set him apart from other Christian vocations.
3 1. “CONSECRATED” |
▲back to top |
Let me start with the first of the keywords: “consecrated”. The brother is a consecrated person. There are different Christian vocations. There are those who follow Christ, while living in the secular milieu where they strive to extend God’s Kingdom: they listen to the Word of God, actively participate in the liturgical and sacramental life, pray personally and in their families, practise love in all the circumstances of their lives, serve their brethren and work for peace, justice and brotherhood among people. These are those whom the Church calls the “lay faithful”. Then, there are Christians who exercise an ordained ministry in the Church; I shall speak of them later.
And finally, there are Christians who choose to follow Christ in another way. They are taken up by the mystery of Christ’s whole life centred on the love of God the Father. They devote themselves entirely to bringing mankind to experience God’s love and respond in love. The Church and her mission are part of this “mystery” of love and have as their ultimate goal the establishment of God the Father’s reign over all. So, attracted by the person of Christ and by the experience of God’s love in their own lives, these Christians feel called to give their lives over to imitating and following Christ more closely, centring their lives too on God the Father and devoting themselves entirely to the service of his Kingdom.
To achieve this total dedication of themselves to God and his Kingdom in imitation of Christ, they choose to give up the way most people live their lives, viz. starting their own family and taking an active part in the economic and political development of the earthly city. Instead, they embrace a life of chastity, poverty and obedience, and embark on a different kind of life together with those brothers of theirs who have felt called the same way, beginning with their inspired Founder. These are those whom the Church calls “consecrated persons”.
Consecrated life, therefore, more than anything else, is essentially a loving relationship with Christ, with the Father and with the Holy Spirit, which leads one to love the brothers with whom he lives and whom he has been sent to serve. Each Founder lived this fundamental reality, bringing to it his own characteristics and accentuations, and in this way formed his Institute’s charism, which basically is his particular way of following Christ more closely.
So, a Salesian brother is a Christian who has experienced this attraction to follow Christ more closely in the footsteps of Don Bosco. Consequently, he gives the primacy in his life to God and dedicates his life entirely to bring young people to experience the Father’s love for them.
Being a consecrated person today has a beauty and importance all its own. As Vita Consacrata says, “the Church and society itself need people capable of devoting themselves totally to God and to others for the love of God”1.
There are many individuals and groups in society who devote their entire lives to a particular value. For example, musicians to music; teachers to education; doctors and nurses to the health of people; policemen to peace in society. All these individuals centre their lives on those particular values and they serve to keep alive those values in the entire population. “Keeping alive” means many things, like: stirring up interest, creating a sense of concern, and reminding others of their own responsibility. Society needs all these people.
In a similar way, when consecrated persons centre their lives on the supreme value, God, they become pointers to people of how much God loves each one and how each one ought to love God in return. A Mother Teresa, for instance, becomes a sign of God’s tender compassion for poor, suffering humanity. Likewise, people used to say of Venerable brother Simon Srugi that “to see Simon and to remember the Lord were one and the same thing” and that “his presence was like the shadow of God’s presence”.
And so, consecrated persons open up a whole new horizon for people:
they remind people to give God the first place in their lives, and show how they can find true joy and freedom in him;
they make Christ present and active in the world today as they go about their teaching and healing and preaching and praying: through them Christ reaches out and touches people’s lives; they reveal the beauty of “falling in love” with Christ and how his love can truly fill a person’s life so that he does not need anything else for his happiness and fulfilment;
in total availability to the Holy Spirit they live the spiritual life and receive the gift of holiness;
they demonstrate what it is to be Church and how we can all live as brothers and sisters, notwithstanding our inevitable differences of origin, language or culture;
they invite everyone to raise their eyes to higher things, e.g. to be convinced that chastity is possible and necessary for genuine human love; that being is more important than having, and sharing more satisfying that hoarding; that doing God’s will, not individualism and self-sufficiency, brings happiness and fulfilment;
they remind everyone of the fullness of life that lies beyond this one, and that holiness is the highest realization of every human being.
As you can see, consecrated life is not only a gift of Christ’s love to a person for his own holiness and happiness, but it is a gift to the Church and to mankind. “To some for the sake of all, God gives the gift of a closer following of Christ in his poverty, chastity, and obedience”.2
Some questions still remain about the need for consecrated persons today. With so much insistence nowadays on lay people sharing in the mission of the Church, some wonder whether consecrated persons, and that includes Salesian brothers, are still indispensable. With lay people today making inroads into what was once the near-exclusive domain of consecrated persons - education, health care and social work - and accomplishing these tasks with professionalism and competence, have not consecrated persons become superfluous today?
I have already spoken above of the much-needed contribution consecrated persons make to the Church and the world through the witness of their lives and work. Let me add a further specific consideration on the work of consecrated persons. I have no doubt whatever that many lay people, as individuals and as groups, can do and are doing several of the works that consecrated persons usually do, and in a committed and effective way. And I can envisage that lay people will increasingly assume an important role in the Church and her mission. That said, however, I think one would be blind not to acknowledge the difference of contribution, both in terms of quantity and quality, that consecrated persons make to the Church’s mission.
Consecrated persons form part of a specialized apostolic group in the Church:
they are specialized in certain apostolic works, for which they are better prepared, receive spiritual nourishment and are able to work with greater stability and constancy in a single direction;
since their religious institute has a centuries-old existence, they have a lot of accumulated worldwide experience which is gradually enriched with newer insights and enables them to carry out a long-lasting work;
at the same time, they have a relative autonomy that enables them to render their services in any part of the world, and quickly; in fact, consecrated persons are often the ones spearheading newer and more difficult apostolates, often in the most inhospitable or inaccessible regions; think of communities of consecrated persons caring for AIDS patients, working with street-children, freeing those caught in the web of slavery and prostitution, rendering humanitarian services to refugees and victims of violence and natural disasters;
they normally work in teams enjoying a great deal of unity and flexibility; their effectiveness stems from the fact that they have the same spiritual tradition, the same formation, the same fraternal atmosphere to sustain them, and a community life that fosters communion and a sharing of responsibility;
they can offer personalized guidance, religious education and a formation of those who wish to take part in the same apostolic endeavour; they know how to share the riches of their charism and their spirituality with others and to share responsibility for the same mission;
their vows give them a great freedom and availability in serving those in need, and their spirituality enhances the authenticity, quality and fruitfulness of their work;
above all, they are aware that they are not carrying out a purely philanthropic work but a divine-human enterprise: Christ sends them and fills them with love for his Father and for humanity, and their objective is to lead people to Christ and to the Father.
We cannot forget that Don Bosco had a band of dedicated lay people when he began his work for poor, abandoned boys, but he was eventually inspired by God and Our Blessed Mother to set up a religious institute to carry on his work.
2. “LAY”
The second keyword that defines the brother is the word “lay”. No doubt, the brother is not exactly a layman like the Christian layman in the world. He “combines in himself the gifts of consecration with those of the lay state”3. He is, in fact, a consecrated layman committed to God through the profession of the three evangelical counsels, life in community and a specific mission. The Christian layman, on the other hand, is generally a married man who holds a job and lives immersed in the secular field, like economy and politics, to mention just two areas. But, for all their differences, there are some key similarities between the brother and the Christian layman.
Through his baptism,
a person becomes a son of God in Jesus Christ, a member of the Church, and a living temple of the Holy Spirit; he is called to live a life of holiness;
he shares in the mission of Christ as prophet, priest and king. In the Old Testament, prophets, priests and kings were three separate categories of persons, all of them anointed or consecrated by God. Jesus instead combined all the three roles in himself: he was prophet and priest and king. And now, in baptism, he gives all God’s people a share in this triple mission of his. So, when the layman, in union with Christ and his sacrifice, offers himself and his daily activities to the Father, he exercises his priesthood. When he manifests the Gospel through his words and deeds, he acts as a prophet. And, when as a Christian he engages in spiritual combat to overcome in himself the kingdom of sin, and dedicates himself to spreading the Kingdom of God, he exercises his kingship;4
the unique character of his vocation is that he seeks the Kingdom of God by working to renew and perfect the temporal order. By the “temporal order” we mean “the good things of life and the prosperity of the family, culture, economic matters, the arts and professions, the laws of the political community, international relations, and other matters of this kind, as well as their development and progress”5; in a word, the whole secular fabric of society.
We know, however, that sin has tainted every aspect of the temporal order; think of corruption, injustice, disrespect for human life, consumerism, intolerance, strife, hedonism, practical atheism, and a host of other ills that plague human life everywhere. Therefore, it is the layman’s role, his “special obligation”6 to act as a leaven in society: he deeply involves himself and fully participates in the affairs of the earth, the world and the human community, and from within works to free the temporal order from the influence of sin and imbue it with the values of the Gospel. This is “properly and particularly" his calling as a Christian layman.
It takes only a moment’s reflection to realize how precious, necessary and important is this role of the Christian layman. Considering the numerous problems that afflict society everywhere -unemployment, the depreciation and wanton destruction of human life from conception to the grave, the exploitation of women and children, war, mass poverty, hunger, disease, religious fanaticism - there is a long, long way to go in order to build up what Pope Paul VI called “a civilization of love”.
Heeding the anguished cry of the world for justice, peace and solidarity, the layman strives to make a difference, beginning from the ordinary circumstances of his family, his social life and his secular profession, and extending all the way to economics, politics and international relations. He fights against sin in all its forms: corruption, injustice, exploitation, violence, hatred, ignorance and poverty, and in its place he seeks to bring in honesty, justice, solidarity, tolerance, love, respect, the growth of persons and a decent human life for all.
Everywhere he seeks to inject Christian values, by striving to create a new mentality that is more in line with the Gospel; he wants the light of Christ to penetrate all sectors of society and transform society from within, giving rise to a culture imbued with Gospel values. This is the typical way in which he shares in the redemption of the world and evangelizes, showing in actual practice more than in words what the Gospel is all about.
Like the Christian layman, the Salesian lay brother too has a unique secular character, which is “his specific characteristic, a noteworthy and essential value of his identity”.7 Being consecrated, however, he does not go the whole way, as the Christian layman does, in immersing himself in the secular field; but he remains deeply engaged in things secular, and instead of dispersing his energies over a vast array of social issues, concentrates on crucial areas that are closely connected with his charism as a Salesian, viz. the integral education of poor youth, the Christian renewal of work, social communication, and the commitment to justice and peace.8
Our Constitutions tell us that “his lay status… [makes] him in a particular way a witness to God’s Kingdom in the world, close as he is to the young and to the realities of working life”.9 His link to the young and to the world of work, then, is part and parcel of his identity. Young people and the “world of work” may, and do in fact, change: the youth of today are so different in every aspect from the youth of, say, fifty years ago; that too was when computers didn’t exist, but today they have become a necessary part of the working world. It all means that the brother has to adapt himself to the changes taking place in the field of youth and the world of work, always seeking to be relevant and useful according to the needs of time and place, but he cannot lose his relation to the young and to the world of labour, because this is a part of his own identity.
At this point, I would invite you to stop awhile to dwell on the beauty and importance of the Salesian brother’s vocation and mission today. The young people with whom he works are “that part of human society which is so exposed and yet so rich in promise”;10 he has to “prepare them to take their place with dignity in society and in the Church and […] alert them to the role they must play in the Christian transformation of social life”.11
As for work, it is a fact that our modern societies are built on work. Work is an important reality for man and society. Through work, man procures his daily bread for himself and his family, but also develops his skills and abilities, builds himself up, grows in values, and shares in the work of the Creator. However, to evangelize this vast and dynamic sector of modern life, one has to enter and take part in it, and that is what the Salesian brother’s vocation and mission is all about.
Being an educator, the brother seeks to inculcate in the young the many personal and social values present in the world of labour, such as: the spirit of brotherhood, solidarity and community, combined with respect for the person of the individual. At the same time, he points out and helps them overcome the evils that threaten them: a materialistic concept of life, indifference to spiritual realities, individualism, envy, sentiments of hostility, temptation to violence.
He is aware of the big challenge he faces in preparing them for life in the world of work today, not only in terms of training them for a job, but also and above all in terms of giving them a strong social, ethical, spiritual and Christian foundation for their lives. Furthermore, through the concern he shows and the love he unceasingly gives to others, he bears witness to a profound and universal brotherhood as an antidote to all forms of egoism, exploitation and self-interest. He reveals God’s Kingdom already present in the world, and proclaims the Kingdom that is to come12.
Undoubtedly, the Salesian brother’s lay dimension is his particular characteristic. It is not limited to his type of apostolic work; it “permeates the entire life of the brother: his Salesian mission, his life in community, his apostolic activity, his religious profession, his life of prayer and his spiritual life”13. This original contribution of the brother enriches the community and the Congregation, and complements the contribution of his priest-confreres. Where the Salesian priest sees a soul to be saved and grace to be brought to transform his life, the Salesian brother sees a human being in need of experiencing God’s love in a tangible way - food, shelter, education, work - and requiring help to live an upright human and Christian life in the world.
3.1 3. “SALESIAN” |
▲back to top |
The third keyword that characterizes the brother’s identity is the word “Salesian”. To be a Salesian is to be a bearer of Don Bosco’s charism. It means that the Salesian is imbued with a deep pastoral love in the very first place and in it he finds his programme of life and his way to holiness. The integral salvation of the young is his primacy concern, especially of those who are poor, and the world of work is a significant field of action for him, considering the importance and incidence of the working class in many countries.
His work with the young consists in both educating and evangelizing them, in line with Don Bosco’s Preventive System. It is a matter of happiness and pride for him to be a member of the worldwide Salesian Congregation, as also to work closely with the lay collaborators in the local educative and pastoral community. In a word, the Brother shares in all the elements that make up the Salesian vocation: the mission to the young, the radical following of Christ, fraternal-apostolic communion, and permeating it all, the Salesian spirit.
What, then, are we to make of Don Bosco’s statement at San Benigno in 1883 when, presenting his idea of the Salesian brother, he said: “There are some things priests and clerics cannot do, and you [brothers] will do them”?14 It would almost seem as if Don Bosco were subscribing to a kind of social stratification, categorizing certain activities as “unworthy” of the priest and therefore reserving them to the brother.
Fr. Stella is of the opinion that “this interpretation cannot be totally excluded, but neither should it be given undue emphasis”.15 In Don Bosco’s time, the theology of the priesthood did contain social taboos and canonical prohibitions regarding manual work. The priest was supposed to embody the holiness of God and therefore had to avoid everything profane. Many ascetical books were harshly critical of priests who did not pay sufficient regard to their dignity.
Nevertheless, in his conference Don Bosco made only a simple reference to certain behaviours and activities that society and canon law considered improper for a priest, viz. running workshops and bookstores, supervising the kitchen, taking care of the administration of the house, and receiving people at the door: “I need to be able to take one of you and send you into a printshop, and say, ‘You take charge and make sure all goes well.’ Another I will send into a bookstore and say, ‘You run this place and make it work well.’ I need someone I can send to a house and say to him, ‘It will be your job to see to it that these workshops or those workshops run in an orderly fashion and leave nothing to be desired. You will make sure that the work is turned out as it should be. I need to have someone in every house who can take responsibility for matters of greater trust, like managing money, settling disputes and representing the house to outsiders. I need to have things running smoothly in the kitchen and in the doorman’s quarters, to have supplies ordered promptly, to see to it that nothing goes to waste, no one goes out, and so forth. I need people I can trust with these responsibilities. You will have to be the ones”.16
Don Bosco’s words might give the impression that, in deference to Church law and existing practice, he wanted the priest to limit himself to religious activities and leave secular undertakings to the brother. In reality, his actual attitude and behaviour were quite different. Instead of riding inside a nobleman’s carriage, he preferred to sit on the coach-box and hear the driver’s confession. When necessary, he taught boys how to bind books or did the washing-up for Mamma Margaret; he had no qualms about recalling his youthful acrobatic performances. Don Bosco belonged to the working-class, and as a religious educator, he did away with many social distinctions. As for his Salesians, they did not shy away from engaging in secular activities when they were necessary and possible, as in mission lands. In the Argentinian “desierto”, for instance, Fr. Evasio Garonne became a celebrity as the ‘cura dotor’: father doctor of Indians and poor settlers.
In September 1886, Don Bosco presided over the 4th General Chapter, which produced the following statement: “There is an immense field open to the brothers for the exercise of charity towards their neighbour and in showing zeal for the glory of God by directing and running the various undertakings of our Pious Society; by becoming shop masters in our technical schools, or by being catechists in our festive oratories and especially in our foreign missions”.17
The point to be noticed here is that Don Bosco did not confine his brothers to work in the secular field; he wanted them to be involved in the pastoral field as well: as catechists and in the foreign missions. In short, when it came to apostolic work, Don Bosco had an open and flexible approach: his priests could also perform secular tasks and his brothers could also engage in religious tasks.
Today’s theology of the priesthood has come a long way from what it was a century ago. Though the priesthood arising from the sacrament of Orders is still a status symbol for many in the Church, and even for some brothers who feel they have no standing as brothers. It is first and last a service rendered to lay people and to consecrated persons. That is why it is called “ministerial”. In Latin “minister” means “servant”.
This service consists in being a sign of Christ the Good Shepherd by carrying out a threefold ministry. Through such a ministry, the priest too, like the layman, shares in the mission of Christ prophet, priest and king, but in a different way:
The layman is a prophet by manifesting the Gospel through his words and example in the secular field, and so helping to change people’s values and mentality so as to bring them more in line with the Gospel.
The layman exercises his priesthood by offering himself and his daily activities, in union with Christ, to the Father.
The layman exercises his kingship as a Christian by fighting against sin and working to spread the Kingdom of God in the secular world.
The priest carries out his prophetic ministry by his preaching and catechesis, helping people come to the faith and grow in it: ministry of the Word.
The priest accomplishes his priestly mission by initiating people into the life of Christ, into liturgical prayer and into the celebration of the sacraments, especially the Eucharist and Reconciliation: ministry of sanctification.
The priest carries out his kingly activity by “animating the Christian community”, by building up and guiding the community of faith: ministry of pastoral care.
So, both priests and lay people share in the mission of Christ, in two different ways. Both are responsible for the mission of the Church, which has two aspects: “not only to bring men the message and grace of Christ, but also to permeate and improve the whole range of the temporal”18.
By their priestly ordination, priests have as their distinctive task “bringing men the message and grace of Christ”, i.e. this is what they ought to be primarily or chiefly concerned about. But this does not take away also their concern for and involvement in the secular field. There are no watertight compartments and so priests can and do also involve themselves in the temporal order, e.g. in education, scientific research, the media, etc. But, their first priestly task lies in their threefold ministry of Word, sanctification and pastoral care.
For their part, because of their immersion in the structures in the world, lay people have as their distinctive task “permeating the whole range of the temporal [with Gospel values]”, i.e. this is what they ought to be primarily or chiefly concerned about. But this does not take away also their concern for and involvement in bringing men the message and grace of Christ. There are in fact no watertight compartments, and so lay people do also help as catechists, teachers, ministers of communion, members of parish councils, etc. But their first place of mission is in the secular field.
What this means for us Salesians is that the personal gifts, talents and abilities that God bestows on each one together with his vocation are to be discerned, developed and put to good use for the sake of the common mission, but never to the detriment or neglect of the primary aspect of his mission as a priest or a brother. In whatever he does, be it in the secular or in the pastoral field, the primary aspect of his mission, lay or priestly, should inspire everything. Don Bosco took pride in saying these words to PM Ricasoli: “Your Excellency, I want you to know that Don Bosco is a priest at the altar, a priest in the confessional, a priest among his boys, a priest in Turin, and a priest in Florence. He is a priest in the house of the poor and a priest in the palace of the king!”19
It was the 21st General Chapter that spoke of a whole gamut of activities lying open to the brother’s involvement, whether catechetical, missionary, evangelical, pedagogical, cultural, administrative, domestic. The brother can therefore qualify for all Salesian educative and pastoral tasks not tied to priestly ordination. There are no areas or activities in a Salesian community that are the exclusive preserve either of the brother or the priest, with the sole exception of those ministries and roles that are specifically priestly. The important thing is that whatever the activity carried out, it must be inspired through and through with the style and spirit of one’s lay or priestly dimension.20
In the above statement of the General Chapter, you already have a pointed answer to two of the questions that you asked me regarding the brother.
First: Can a brother be a retreat spiritual director? My response is simply: Why not? Being a retreat spiritual director could mean animating a Retreat, while someone else gives the talks and conferences, or it could mean conducting the whole Retreat oneself. In either case, I don’t see why a Brother who is competent and well-prepared couldn’t carry out this service. I know of competent Salesian sisters who have preached Retreats to Salesians in Italy and elsewhere.
Second: Can a brother be a member of the General Council? My response is: Sure, he can. The 21st General Chapter could not have expressed it more clearly when it said: “At the world level, he [the brother] can… form part of the Superior Council of the Congregation.”21 All that is required is for him to be elected to the Council by the General Chapter.
The above statement of GC21 does also raise an interesting question about the Salesian priest. Seeing that there are no exclusive areas or activities for the priest or the brother, except those linked with priestly ordination, shouldn’t the priest, and especially the Rector, make it a point to experience firsthand the life and activity of the Salesian brother, e.g. learn a profession or experience life in a workshop, in order to be able to understand the brother and assess his vocation?
The first thing to be said in general is that it is not possible, and not necessary either, for a person to experience the life of another person in order to be able to guide him. There is also a second aspect to be kept in mind: the Rector’s role does not require him to be an expert in all matters pertaining to every sector of his house, and much less so when there are persons who are responsible for each of those sectors. Instead, his competence lies in the area of personal and spiritual growth, the charism of Don Bosco, Salesian consecrated life and prayer, ...
Let me now turn to where our real problem lies. In the AGC 335 Fr. Egidio Viganò once made the following statement: “In the Congregation we have many priests but little priesthood!” I believe that what he meant to say was that he had come across too many priests who were reluctant to carry out the priestly tasks for which they were ordained and wholly occupied themselves with tasks in the secular field, manifesting all the while scant evidence of a priestly heart in action. They considered the priestly ministry a part-time job and reduced its activities to a bare minimum.
Now, this is a problem that is not confined to the Salesian Congregation but affects the Church at large. There are too many priests in the Church trying to do practically everything themselves and leaving little or nothing to the laity. The result is clericalism. And even where an “enlightened” clergy attempts to give an apostolic role to the laity, there is a tendency to involve them in the pastoral and not in the secular field, thus leading to a “clericalization of the lay faithful”22.
That is why John Paul II chose to remind us that, for lay people "their own field of evangelizing activity is the vast and complicated world of politics, society and economics, as well as the world of culture, of the sciences and the arts, of international life, of the mass media. It also includes other realities which are open to evangelization, such as human love, the family, the education of children and adolescents, professional work, and suffering. The more Gospel-inspired lay people there are engaged in these realities, clearly involved in them, competent to promote them and conscious that they must exercise to the full their Christian powers which are often repressed and buried, the more these realities will be at the service of the Kingdom of God and therefore at the service of salvation in Jesus Christ, without in any way losing or sacrificing their human content but rather pointing to a transcendent dimension which is often disregarded".23
Again, going back to Fr. Viganò, he was once giving a conference at Newton - New Jersey shortly after Project Africa had taken off in the Congregation. At one moment, he said: “If we had 400 Brothers and 100 priests to send to Africa, they would make first-rate communities!” Reading between the lines, one notices him hinting at the fact that, really speaking, the greater bulk of activities in our houses can easily be done by brothers. But, our problem is that we have so few brothers, and so you find priests doing practically everything.
This is what prompts some to make statements like the following: “Priests can do everything that brothers can do, so we do not need brothers!” I think this is a misleading statement. Using the same logic, one could say: “Mothers can do everything that fathers can do, so we do not need fathers!” Haven’t many of us come across some mothers who single-handedly are doing a creditable job of raising a family? Still, the fact that this is so does not take away the need for the complementary figure of the father. Father and mother, each carrying out his and her role, create a healthy family and the best conditions for the growth of children to maturity.
I believe that the question about the priest and the brother in the community is not about whether a priest can do everything, but about whether he should.
The mission of the Church, as we have seen, comprises two complementary aspects: bringing to men the message and grace of Christ and permeating the temporal order with the values of the Gospel; sometimes, we speak of the evangelization of persons and the evangelization of society. The members of the Church give expression to these two aspects in different ways: the first, but not exclusive, concern of priests is to bring people to faith, celebrate that faith in the liturgy and the sacraments, and build up the community of faith. The first, but not exclusive, concern of lay people and religious is to proclaim the faith in the world by word and deed, to offer themselves and their work to God, and to work to take away sin in all its various forms from society and the world, and to bring in the fruits of grace and the Gospel.
Since the Salesian Congregation shares in the mission of the Church, its mission too has this double dimension, which it lives out according to its charism in the world of the young. Its priests are mainly, but not exclusively, concerned with the pastoral aspect of the mission to the young, while its brothers concentrate first and foremost, but not exclusively, on the secular aspect.
Now, every Salesian, be he a priest or a brother, is a bearer of the mission of the Congregation and therefore has within him this double dimension, which he lives to a greater or lesser extent in accordance with the form of his vocation, priestly or lay. This means that while the Salesian priest carries out his principal task, there is also in his heart a sensitivity to the secular aspect, which is the main focus of attention and activity of his brother-confrere; for instance, he feels a preoccupation for the problems of working youth. And likewise, while the Salesian brother carries out his principal task, there is also in his heart a sensitivity to the pastoral aspect - faith, grace, sacraments - which is the main focus of attention and activity of his priest-confrere; for instance, he feels a sense of concern about the many young people who leave the Church.
And that is how the Salesian priest and the Salesian brother mutually need each other and complement each other. Each is insufficient without the other, and therefore needs to be enriched by the lived experience of the other. The priest cannot pretend to know everything about the problems connected with the working world; I need the brother to enlighten me. In similar fashion, the brother cannot pretend to know everything about sharing in the life of the Church; he needs the priest to enlighten him.
This, then, is how Don Bosco envisaged the Salesian community engaged in its mission: the two forms of the Salesian vocation, the priest and the brother, living the same Salesian project of life with one heart and one soul, yet carrying out their respective roles in brotherly solidarity and complementarity. In a reciprocal relationship of this sort, there is no subordination or opposition, nor is there a loss or a fusion of each one’s lay or priestly characteristics. Instead, there is a mutual communion and communication between Salesians, an exchange each one’s values and experience.
Years ago, Fr. Ricceri wrote: “We are a community of priests and laymen carrying on a vital exchange in the Spirit of the riches of their different vocations closely bound up together by a common mission to youth and the working classes.”24 Not without reason Cost 45 declares: “The significant and complementary presence of clerical and lay Salesians in the community constitutes an essential element of its make-up and of its apostolic completeness.”
Therefore, the more Salesian priests and Salesian brothers understand, appreciate and respect each other’s identity and role, the stronger they will be in their respective vocations, the better will they work in their respective fields, and the greater will be their contribution to each other and to the mission of their own community and of the Congregation.
4 Conclusion |
▲back to top |
It is my conviction that, today more than ever before, the Salesian brother’s vocation is a vocation that is still to be discovered. It has been so little understood and appreciated, by the brothers themselves, by priests and by the people of God at large, and that accounts in no small measure for the paucity of vocations to the brotherhood.
Through his vocation, life and action, the brother is a reminder to his priest-confreres of the values inherent in their own vocation as consecrated Salesians and the importance of being disciples before being teachers. He bears witness to a convinced life of faith not tied to functional or ministerial duties.25 He highlights for his priest-confreres the ramifications of the Congregation’s mission in the world, and holds up to them “the vision of an apostolic goal and ideal that is complex in its reality, because it goes beyond priestly and catechetical activity in the strict sense.”26 He recalls them constantly to an active collaboration with lay people.
At the same time, by the example of his Salesian lay consecrated life more than through his words, he offers to the Christian community a particular type of incarnation in the world and a particular presence in the Church. He proclaims to priests and lay people alike the presence of God in daily life and activities. He is a model for them of how to live the Gospel in the midst of one’s secular undertakings, sanctify one’s work and strive for holiness through a total dedication to God for the cause of the Kingdom.27
In a special way, he offers to all “a particular sensitivity for the world of work, a concern for the immediate neighbourhood, and a need for the kind of professional approach he uses in his educative and pastoral activity.”28 Young people in particular find in him a brother who is close to them and to the realities of their lives, who assists them in their growth as human beings and as Christians, and who prepares them to take their rightful place in society and in the Church.
Don Rinaldi was perfectly right when he called the Salesian brother the “genial creation of the great heart of Don Bosco”.29
QUESTIONS
Is the lay brother absolutely essential in the Salesian Congregation?
Is there a hopeful future for brothers?
Is the brother’s existence indispensable for the Salesian charism at the present day when ordinary lay Christians are given a role in the mission of the Church - something that was perhaps unthinkable in Don Bosco’s time?
Who really is the Salesian brother?
Could the shortage of Salesian brothers be due to the style of vocation and formation programmes, which have laid a strong and sometimes exclusive emphasis on the priestly vocation?
If lay people are given a role in the mission of the Church, is the brother indispensable?
With the enormous need for good priests, why should I encourage a good young man to become a brother?
Why do we need so many priests if for most of them the priestly ministry is only a part-time job? For some of them the full-time job is being a Principal or an Administrator.
What criterion does the Novice-master apply in discerning the specific vocation of the Salesian brother? It would appear that the candidate who is intelligent is encouraged to become a priest, whereas the one who is not similarly gifted is recommended to become a brother.
If the Salesian priest can do anything and everything, what specific work remains for the brother?
Would it be possible to train brothers to become spiritual retreat directors instead of priests, who are always too busy?
The work a Salesian brother does is a part of his vocation. Considering the vast and rapid changes taking place in the world of work today, it does not seem possible to ensure solidity for the Salesian brother’s vocational identity. Will we always have to struggle to catch up with the changing social circumstances?
There are things that the priest cannot do. What are those things?
What is the clear and distinct difference between the missionary or apostolic work of the priest and the brother?
How can we have a more integral type of community apostolate in which there are no stereotyped tasks: temporal duties for brothers, spiritual duties for priests?
We have brothers in the House or Provincial Council. Why don’t we have brothers in the General Council?
How can a “non-specialist” Rector assess or accompany a Salesian brother in his professional work?
Not only brothers but clerics and priests too are not aware of the identity and role of the Salesian brother in the Congregation, despite long years of formation. What can be done to overcome such a situation?
Can we also promote the vocation of a simple religious, like a “factotum”?
Should the discernment criteria be based mostly on academic performance?
How can we break the following vicious cycle: an inferiority complex, the need for high-level qualification, poor formation, few brother vocations, and meagre efforts to promote the Salesian brother’s vocation?
1 Vita Consecrata 105.
2 Essential Elements in the Church’s Teaching on Religious Life 7.
3 GC24 154.
4 Cf. Christifideles Laici 14.
5 Apostolicam Actuositatem 7.
6 Ibid.
7 GC21 178.
8 Cf. Cost 6, 33.
9 Cost. 45.
10 BM II, 35, quoted in Cost 1.
11 Cost. 27.
12 Cf. GC21 183-184.
13 GC21 178.
14 BM XVI, 245.
15 P. STELLA, Cattolicesimo in Italia e laicato nelle Congregazioni religiose. Il caso dei coadiutori salesiani (1854 - 1974), Salesianum (1975), p. 424.
16 BM XVI, 245-246.
17 BM XVIII, 642.
18 Apostolicam Actuositatem 5.
19 BM VIII, 239.
20 Cf. GC21 182.
21 GC21 192.
22 Christifideles Laici 23.
23 Ibid.
24 Acts of the World Congress of Salesian Brothers, Rome 1975, p. 456.
25 Cfr. J. VECCHI, The Father consecrates us and sends us, AGC 365 (1998), p. 41.
26 The Salesian Brother. History, Identity, Vocational Apostolate and Formation, Rome 1989, 122.
27 Cf. FSDB 40.
28 GC24 154.
29 ASC 40, p. 572.