papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si-en


papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si-en

1 Pages 1-10

▲back to top

1.1 Page 1

▲back to top
The Holy See
ENCYCLICAL LETTER
LAUDATO SI’
OF THE HOLY FATHER
FRANCIS
ON CARE FOR OUR COMMON HOME
1. “LAUDATO SI’, mi’ Signore” – “Praise be to you, my Lord”. In the words of this beautiful canticle,
Saint Francis of Assisi reminds us that our common home is like a sister with whom we share our
life and a beautiful mother who opens her arms to embrace us. “Praise be to you, my Lord,
through our Sister, Mother Earth, who sustains and governs us, and who produces various fruit
with coloured flowers and herbs”.[1]
2. This sister now cries out to us because of the harm we have inflicted on her by our irresponsible
use and abuse of the goods with which God has endowed her. We have come to see ourselves as
her lords and masters, entitled to plunder her at will. The violence present in our hearts, wounded
by sin, is also reflected in the symptoms of sickness evident in the soil, in the water, in the air and
in all forms of life. This is why the earth herself, burdened and laid waste, is among the most
abandoned and maltreated of our poor; she “groans in travail” (Rom 8:22). We have forgotten that
we ourselves are dust of the earth (cf. Gen 2:7); our very bodies are made up of her elements, we
breathe her air and we receive life and refreshment from her waters.
Nothing in this world is indifferent to us
3. More than fifty years ago, with the world teetering on the brink of nuclear crisis, Pope Saint John
XXIII wrote an Encyclical which not only rejected war but offered a proposal for peace. He
addressed his message Pacem in Terris to the entire “Catholic world” and indeed “to all men and
women of good will”. Now, faced as we are with global environmental deterioration, I wish to

1.2 Page 2

▲back to top
2
address every person living on this planet. In my Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii Gaudium, I wrote
to all the members of the Church with the aim of encouraging ongoing missionary renewal. In this
Encyclical, I would like to enter into dialogue with all people about our common home.
4. In 1971, eight years after Pacem in Terris, Blessed Pope Paul VI referred to the ecological
concern as “a tragic consequence” of unchecked human activity: “Due to an ill-considered
exploitation of nature, humanity runs the risk of destroying it and becoming in turn a victim of this
degradation”.[2] He spoke in similar terms to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United
Nations about the potential for an “ecological catastrophe under the effective explosion of
industrial civilization”, and stressed “the urgent need for a radical change in the conduct of
humanity”, inasmuch as “the most extraordinary scientific advances, the most amazing technical
abilities, the most astonishing economic growth, unless they are accompanied by authentic social
and moral progress, will definitively turn against man”.[3]
5. Saint John Paul II became increasingly concerned about this issue. In his first Encyclical he
warned that human beings frequently seem “to see no other meaning in their natural environment
than what serves for immediate use and consumption”.[4] Subsequently, he would call for a global
ecological conversion.[5] At the same time, he noted that little effort had been made to “safeguard
the moral conditions for an authentic human ecology”.[6] The destruction of the human
environment is extremely serious, not only because God has entrusted the world to us men and
women, but because human life is itself a gift which must be defended from various forms of
debasement. Every effort to protect and improve our world entails profound changes in “lifestyles,
models of production and consumption, and the established structures of power which today
govern societies”.[7] Authentic human development has a moral character. It presumes full respect
for the human person, but it must also be concerned for the world around us and “take into
account the nature of each being and of its mutual connection in an ordered system”.[8]
Accordingly, our human ability to transform reality must proceed in line with God’s original gift of all
that is.[9]
6. My predecessor Benedict XVI likewise proposed “eliminating the structural causes of the
dysfunctions of the world economy and correcting models of growth which have proved incapable
of ensuring respect for the environment”.[10] He observed that the world cannot be analyzed by
isolating only one of its aspects, since “the book of nature is one and indivisible”, and includes the
environment, life, sexuality, the family, social relations, and so forth. It follows that “the
deterioration of nature is closely connected to the culture which shapes human coexistence”.[11]
Pope Benedict asked us to recognize that the natural environment has been gravely damaged by
our irresponsible behaviour. The social environment has also suffered damage. Both are ultimately
due to the same evil: the notion that there are no indisputable truths to guide our lives, and hence
human freedom is limitless. We have forgotten that “man is not only a freedom which he creates
for himself. Man does not create himself. He is spirit and will, but also nature”.[12] With paternal
concern, Benedict urged us to realize that creation is harmed “where we ourselves have the final

1.3 Page 3

▲back to top
3
word, where everything is simply our property and we use it for ourselves alone. The misuse of
creation begins when we no longer recognize any higher instance than ourselves, when we see
nothing else but ourselves”.[13]
United by the same concern
7. These statements of the Popes echo the reflections of numerous scientists, philosophers,
theologians and civic groups, all of which have enriched the Church’s thinking on these questions.
Outside the Catholic Church, other Churches and Christian communities – and other religions as
well – have expressed deep concern and offered valuable reflections on issues which all of us find
disturbing. To give just one striking example, I would mention the statements made by the beloved
Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew, with whom we share the hope of full ecclesial communion.
8. Patriarch Bartholomew has spoken in particular of the need for each of us to repent of the ways
we have harmed the planet, for “inasmuch as we all generate small ecological damage”, we are
called to acknowledge “our contribution, smaller or greater, to the disfigurement and destruction of
creation”.[14] He has repeatedly stated this firmly and persuasively, challenging us to
acknowledge our sins against creation: “For human beings… to destroy the biological diversity of
God’s creation; for human beings to degrade the integrity of the earth by causing changes in its
climate, by stripping the earth of its natural forests or destroying its wetlands; for human beings to
contaminate the earth’s waters, its land, its air, and its life – these are sins”.[15] For “to commit a
crime against the natural world is a sin against ourselves and a sin against God”.[16]
9. At the same time, Bartholomew has drawn attention to the ethical and spiritual roots of
environmental problems, which require that we look for solutions not only in technology but in a
change of humanity; otherwise we would be dealing merely with symptoms. He asks us to replace
consumption with sacrifice, greed with generosity, wastefulness with a spirit of sharing, an
asceticism which “entails learning to give, and not simply to give up. It is a way of loving, of moving
gradually away from what I want to what God’s world needs. It is liberation from fear, greed and
compulsion”.[17] As Christians, we are also called “to accept the world as a sacrament of
communion, as a way of sharing with God and our neighbours on a global scale. It is our humble
conviction that the divine and the human meet in the slightest detail in the seamless garment of
God’s creation, in the last speck of dust of our planet”.[18]
Saint Francis of Assisi
10. I do not want to write this Encyclical without turning to that attractive and compelling figure,
whose name I took as my guide and inspiration when I was elected Bishop of Rome. I believe that
Saint Francis is the example par excellence of care for the vulnerable and of an integral ecology
lived out joyfully and authentically. He is the patron saint of all who study and work in the area of
ecology, and he is also much loved by non-Christians. He was particularly concerned for God’s

1.4 Page 4

▲back to top
4
creation and for the poor and outcast. He loved, and was deeply loved for his joy, his generous
self-giving, his openheartedness. He was a mystic and a pilgrim who lived in simplicity and in
wonderful harmony with God, with others, with nature and with himself. He shows us just how
inseparable the bond is between concern for nature, justice for the poor, commitment to society,
and interior peace.
11. Francis helps us to see that an integral ecology calls for openness to categories which
transcend the language of mathematics and biology, and take us to the heart of what it is to be
human. Just as happens when we fall in love with someone, whenever he would gaze at the sun,
the moon or the smallest of animals, he burst into song, drawing all other creatures into his praise.
He communed with all creation, even preaching to the flowers, inviting them “to praise the Lord,
just as if they were endowed with reason”.[19] His response to the world around him was so much
more than intellectual appreciation or economic calculus, for to him each and every creature was a
sister united to him by bonds of affection. That is why he felt called to care for all that exists. His
disciple Saint Bonaventure tells us that, “from a reflection on the primary source of all things, filled
with even more abundant piety, he would call creatures, no matter how small, by the name of
‘brother’ or ‘sister’”.[20] Such a conviction cannot be written off as naive romanticism, for it affects
the choices which determine our behaviour. If we approach nature and the environment without
this openness to awe and wonder, if we no longer speak the language of fraternity and beauty in
our relationship with the world, our attitude will be that of masters, consumers, ruthless exploiters,
unable to set limits on their immediate needs. By contrast, if we feel intimately united with all that
exists, then sobriety and care will well up spontaneously. The poverty and austerity of Saint
Francis were no mere veneer of asceticism, but something much more radical: a refusal to turn
reality into an object simply to be used and controlled.
12. What is more, Saint Francis, faithful to Scripture, invites us to see nature as a magnificent
book in which God speaks to us and grants us a glimpse of his infinite beauty and goodness.
“Through the greatness and the beauty of creatures one comes to know by analogy their maker”
(Wis 13:5); indeed, “his eternal power and divinity have been made known through his works since
the creation of the world” (Rom 1:20). For this reason, Francis asked that part of the friary garden
always be left untouched, so that wild flowers and herbs could grow there, and those who saw
them could raise their minds to God, the Creator of such beauty.[21] Rather than a problem to be
solved, the world is a joyful mystery to be contemplated with gladness and praise.
My appeal
13. The urgent challenge to protect our common home includes a concern to bring the whole
human family together to seek a sustainable and integral development, for we know that things
can change. The Creator does not abandon us; he never forsakes his loving plan or repents of
having created us. Humanity still has the ability to work together in building our common home.
Here I want to recognize, encourage and thank all those striving in countless ways to guarantee

1.5 Page 5

▲back to top
5
the protection of the home which we share. Particular appreciation is owed to those who tirelessly
seek to resolve the tragic effects of environmental degradation on the lives of the world’s poorest.
Young people demand change. They wonder how anyone can claim to be building a better future
without thinking of the environmental crisis and the sufferings of the excluded.
14. I urgently appeal, then, for a new dialogue about how we are shaping the future of our planet.
We need a conversation which includes everyone, since the environmental challenge we are
undergoing, and its human roots, concern and affect us all. The worldwide ecological movement
has already made considerable progress and led to the establishment of numerous organizations
committed to raising awareness of these challenges. Regrettably, many efforts to seek concrete
solutions to the environmental crisis have proved ineffective, not only because of powerful
opposition but also because of a more general lack of interest. Obstructionist attitudes, even on
the part of believers, can range from denial of the problem to indifference, nonchalant resignation
or blind confidence in technical solutions. We require a new and universal solidarity. As the
bishops of Southern Africa have stated: “Everyone’s talents and involvement are needed to
redress the damage caused by human abuse of God’s creation”. [22] All of us can cooperate as
instruments of God for the care of creation, each according to his or her own culture, experience,
involvements and talents.
15. It is my hope that this Encyclical Letter, which is now added to the body of the Church’s social
teaching, can help us to acknowledge the appeal, immensity and urgency of the challenge we
face. I will begin by briefly reviewing several aspects of the present ecological crisis, with the aim
of drawing on the results of the best scientific research available today, letting them touch us
deeply and provide a concrete foundation for the ethical and spiritual itinerary that follows. I will
then consider some principles drawn from the Judaeo-Christian tradition which can render our
commitment to the environment more coherent. I will then attempt to get to the roots of the present
situation, so as to consider not only its symptoms but also its deepest causes. This will help to
provide an approach to ecology which respects our unique place as human beings in this world
and our relationship to our surroundings. In light of this reflection, I will advance some broader
proposals for dialogue and action which would involve each of us as individuals, and also affect
international policy. Finally, convinced as I am that change is impossible without motivation and a
process of education, I will offer some inspired guidelines for human development to be found in
the treasure of Christian spiritual experience.
16. Although each chapter will have its own subject and specific approach, it will also take up and
re-examine important questions previously dealt with. This is particularly the case with a number of
themes which will reappear as the Encyclical unfolds. As examples, I will point to the intimate
relationship between the poor and the fragility of the planet, the conviction that everything in the
world is connected, the critique of new paradigms and forms of power derived from technology,
the call to seek other ways of understanding the economy and progress, the value proper to each
creature, the human meaning of ecology, the need for forthright and honest debate, the serious

1.6 Page 6

▲back to top
6
responsibility of international and local policy, the throwaway culture and the proposal of a new
lifestyle. These questions will not be dealt with once and for all, but reframed and enriched again
and again.
CHAPTER ONE
WHAT IS HAPPENING TO OUR COMMON HOME
17. Theological and philosophical reflections on the situation of humanity and the world can sound
tiresome and abstract, unless they are grounded in a fresh analysis of our present situation, which
is in many ways unprecedented in the history of humanity. So, before considering how faith brings
new incentives and requirements with regard to the world of which we are a part, I will briefly turn
to what is happening to our common home.
18. The continued acceleration of changes affecting humanity and the planet is coupled today with
a more intensified pace of life and work which might be called “rapidification”. Although change is
part of the working of complex systems, the speed with which human activity has developed
contrasts with the naturally slow pace of biological evolution. Moreover, the goals of this rapid and
constant change are not necessarily geared to the common good or to integral and sustainable
human development. Change is something desirable, yet it becomes a source of anxiety when it
causes harm to the world and to the quality of life of much of humanity.
19. Following a period of irrational confidence in progress and human abilities, some sectors of
society are now adopting a more critical approach. We see increasing sensitivity to the
environment and the need to protect nature, along with a growing concern, both genuine and
distressing, for what is happening to our planet. Let us review, however cursorily, those questions
which are troubling us today and which we can no longer sweep under the carpet. Our goal is not
to amass information or to satisfy curiosity, but rather to become painfully aware, to dare to turn
what is happening to the world into our own personal suffering and thus to discover what each of
us can do about it.
I. POLLUTION AND CLIMATE CHANGE
Pollution, waste and the throwaway culture
20. Some forms of pollution are part of people’s daily experience. Exposure to atmospheric
pollutants produces a broad spectrum of health hazards, especially for the poor, and causes
millions of premature deaths. People take sick, for example, from breathing high levels of smoke
from fuels used in cooking or heating. There is also pollution that affects everyone, caused by
transport, industrial fumes, substances which contribute to the acidification of soil and water,
fertilizers, insecticides, fungicides, herbicides and agrotoxins in general. Technology, which, linked

1.7 Page 7

▲back to top
7
to business interests, is presented as the only way of solving these problems, in fact proves
incapable of seeing the mysterious network of relations between things and so sometimes solves
one problem only to create others.
21. Account must also be taken of the pollution produced by residue, including dangerous waste
present in different areas. Each year hundreds of millions of tons of waste are generated, much of
it non-biodegradable, highly toxic and radioactive, from homes and businesses, from construction
and demolition sites, from clinical, electronic and industrial sources. The earth, our home, is
beginning to look more and more like an immense pile of filth. In many parts of the planet, the
elderly lament that once beautiful landscapes are now covered with rubbish. Industrial waste and
chemical products utilized in cities and agricultural areas can lead to bioaccumulation in the
organisms of the local population, even when levels of toxins in those places are low. Frequently
no measures are taken until after people’s health has been irreversibly affected.
22. These problems are closely linked to a throwaway culture which affects the excluded just as it
quickly reduces things to rubbish. To cite one example, most of the paper we produce is thrown
away and not recycled. It is hard for us to accept that the way natural ecosystems work is
exemplary: plants synthesize nutrients which feed herbivores; these in turn become food for
carnivores, which produce significant quantities of organic waste which give rise to new
generations of plants. But our industrial system, at the end of its cycle of production and
consumption, has not developed the capacity to absorb and reuse waste and by-products. We
have not yet managed to adopt a circular model of production capable of preserving resources for
present and future generations, while limiting as much as possible the use of non-renewable
resources, moderating their consumption, maximizing their efficient use, reusing and recycling
them. A serious consideration of this issue would be one way of counteracting the throwaway
culture which affects the entire planet, but it must be said that only limited progress has been
made in this regard.
Climate as a common good
23. The climate is a common good, belonging to all and meant for all. At the global level, it is a
complex system linked to many of the essential conditions for human life. A very solid scientific
consensus indicates that we are presently witnessing a disturbing warming of the climatic system.
In recent decades this warming has been accompanied by a constant rise in the sea level and, it
would appear, by an increase of extreme weather events, even if a scientifically determinable
cause cannot be assigned to each particular phenomenon. Humanity is called to recognize the
need for changes of lifestyle, production and consumption, in order to combat this warming or at
least the human causes which produce or aggravate it. It is true that there are other factors (such
as volcanic activity, variations in the earth’s orbit and axis, the solar cycle), yet a number of
scientific studies indicate that most global warming in recent decades is due to the great
concentration of greenhouse gases (carbon dioxide, methane, nitrogen oxides and others)

1.8 Page 8

▲back to top
8
released mainly as a result of human activity. As these gases build up in the atmosphere, they
hamper the escape of heat produced by sunlight at the earth’s surface. The problem is aggravated
by a model of development based on the intensive use of fossil fuels, which is at the heart of the
worldwide energy system. Another determining factor has been an increase in changed uses of
the soil, principally deforestation for agricultural purposes.
24. Warming has effects on the carbon cycle. It creates a vicious circle which aggravates the
situation even more, affecting the availability of essential resources like drinking water, energy and
agricultural production in warmer regions, and leading to the extinction of part of the planet’s
biodiversity. The melting in the polar ice caps and in high altitude plains can lead to the dangerous
release of methane gas, while the decomposition of frozen organic material can further increase
the emission of carbon dioxide. Things are made worse by the loss of tropical forests which would
otherwise help to mitigate climate change. Carbon dioxide pollution increases the acidification of
the oceans and compromises the marine food chain. If present trends continue, this century may
well witness extraordinary climate change and an unprecedented destruction of ecosystems, with
serious consequences for all of us. A rise in the sea level, for example, can create extremely
serious situations, if we consider that a quarter of the world’s population lives on the coast or
nearby, and that the majority of our megacities are situated in coastal areas.
25. Climate change is a global problem with grave implications: environmental, social, economic,
political and for the distribution of goods. It represents one of the principal challenges facing
humanity in our day. Its worst impact will probably be felt by developing countries in coming
decades. Many of the poor live in areas particularly affected by phenomena related to warming,
and their means of subsistence are largely dependent on natural reserves and ecosystemic
services such as agriculture, fishing and forestry. They have no other financial activities or
resources which can enable them to adapt to climate change or to face natural disasters, and their
access to social services and protection is very limited. For example, changes in climate, to which
animals and plants cannot adapt, lead them to migrate; this in turn affects the livelihood of the
poor, who are then forced to leave their homes, with great uncertainty for their future and that of
their children. There has been a tragic rise in the number of migrants seeking to flee from the
growing poverty caused by environmental degradation. They are not recognized by international
conventions as refugees; they bear the loss of the lives they have left behind, without enjoying any
legal protection whatsoever. Sadly, there is widespread indifference to such suffering, which is
even now taking place throughout our world. Our lack of response to these tragedies involving our
brothers and sisters points to the loss of that sense of responsibility for our fellow men and women
upon which all civil society is founded.
26. Many of those who possess more resources and economic or political power seem mostly to
be concerned with masking the problems or concealing their symptoms, simply making efforts to
reduce some of the negative impacts of climate change. However, many of these symptoms
indicate that such effects will continue to worsen if we continue with current models of production

1.9 Page 9

▲back to top
9
and consumption. There is an urgent need to develop policies so that, in the next few years, the
emission of carbon dioxide and other highly polluting gases can be drastically reduced, for
example, substituting for fossil fuels and developing sources of renewable energy. Worldwide
there is minimal access to clean and renewable energy. There is still a need to develop adequate
storage technologies. Some countries have made considerable progress, although it is far from
constituting a significant proportion. Investments have also been made in means of production and
transportation which consume less energy and require fewer raw materials, as well as in methods
of construction and renovating buildings which improve their energy efficiency. But these good
practices are still far from widespread.
II. THE ISSUE OF WATER
27. Other indicators of the present situation have to do with the depletion of natural resources. We
all know that it is not possible to sustain the present level of consumption in developed countries
and wealthier sectors of society, where the habit of wasting and discarding has reached
unprecedented levels. The exploitation of the planet has already exceeded acceptable limits and
we still have not solved the problem of poverty.
28. Fresh drinking water is an issue of primary importance, since it is indispensable for human life
and for supporting terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Sources of fresh water are necessary for
health care, agriculture and industry. Water supplies used to be relatively constant, but now in
many places demand exceeds the sustainable supply, with dramatic consequences in the short
and long term. Large cities dependent on significant supplies of water have experienced periods of
shortage, and at critical moments these have not always been administered with sufficient
oversight and impartiality. Water poverty especially affects Africa where large sectors of the
population have no access to safe drinking water or experience droughts which impede
agricultural production. Some countries have areas rich in water while others endure drastic
scarcity.
29. One particularly serious problem is the quality of water available to the poor. Every day, unsafe
water results in many deaths and the spread of water-related diseases, including those caused by
microorganisms and chemical substances. Dysentery and cholera, linked to inadequate hygiene
and water supplies, are a significant cause of suffering and of infant mortality. Underground water
sources in many places are threatened by the pollution produced in certain mining, farming and
industrial activities, especially in countries lacking adequate regulation or controls. It is not only a
question of industrial waste. Detergents and chemical products, commonly used in many places of
the world, continue to pour into our rivers, lakes and seas.
30. Even as the quality of available water is constantly diminishing, in some places there is a
growing tendency, despite its scarcity, to privatize this resource, turning it into a commodity
subject to the laws of the market. Yet access to safe drinkable water is a basic and universal

1.10 Page 10

▲back to top
10
human right, since it is essential to human survival and, as such, is a condition for the exercise of
other human rights. Our world has a grave social debt towards the poor who lack access to
drinking water, because they are denied the right to a life consistent with their inalienable dignity.
This debt can be paid partly by an increase in funding to provide clean water and sanitary services
among the poor. But water continues to be wasted, not only in the developed world but also in
developing countries which possess it in abundance. This shows that the problem of water is
partly an educational and cultural issue, since there is little awareness of the seriousness of such
behaviour within a context of great inequality.
31. Greater scarcity of water will lead to an increase in the cost of food and the various products
which depend on its use. Some studies warn that an acute water shortage may occur within a few
decades unless urgent action is taken. The environmental repercussions could affect billions of
people; it is also conceivable that the control of water by large multinational businesses may
become a major source of conflict in this century.[23]
III. LOSS OF BIODIVERSITY
32. The earth’s resources are also being plundered because of short-sighted approaches to the
economy, commerce and production. The loss of forests and woodlands entails the loss of species
which may constitute extremely important resources in the future, not only for food but also for
curing disease and other uses. Different species contain genes which could be key resources in
years ahead for meeting human needs and regulating environmental problems.
33. It is not enough, however, to think of different species merely as potential “resources” to be
exploited, while overlooking the fact that they have value in themselves. Each year sees the
disappearance of thousands of plant and animal species which we will never know, which our
children will never see, because they have been lost for ever. The great majority become extinct
for reasons related to human activity. Because of us, thousands of species will no longer give
glory to God by their very existence, nor convey their message to us. We have no such right.
34. It may well disturb us to learn of the extinction of mammals or birds, since they are more
visible. But the good functioning of ecosystems also requires fungi, algae, worms, insects, reptiles
and an innumerable variety of microorganisms. Some less numerous species, although generally
unseen, nonetheless play a critical role in maintaining the equilibrium of a particular place. Human
beings must intervene when a geosystem reaches a critical state. But nowadays, such intervention
in nature has become more and more frequent. As a consequence, serious problems arise,
leading to further interventions; human activity becomes ubiquitous, with all the risks which this
entails. Often a vicious circle results, as human intervention to resolve a problem further
aggravates the situation. For example, many birds and insects which disappear due to synthetic
agrotoxins are helpful for agriculture: their disappearance will have to be compensated for by yet
other techniques which may well prove harmful. We must be grateful for the praiseworthy efforts

2 Pages 11-20

▲back to top

2.1 Page 11

▲back to top
11
being made by scientists and engineers dedicated to finding solutions to man-made problems. But
a sober look at our world shows that the degree of human intervention, often in the service of
business interests and consumerism, is actually making our earth less rich and beautiful, ever
more limited and grey, even as technological advances and consumer goods continue to abound
limitlessly. We seem to think that we can substitute an irreplaceable and irretrievable beauty with
something which we have created ourselves.
35. In assessing the environmental impact of any project, concern is usually shown for its effects
on soil, water and air, yet few careful studies are made of its impact on biodiversity, as if the loss
of species or animals and plant groups were of little importance. Highways, new plantations, the
fencing-off of certain areas, the damming of water sources, and similar developments, crowd out
natural habitats and, at times, break them up in such a way that animal populations can no longer
migrate or roam freely. As a result, some species face extinction. Alternatives exist which at least
lessen the impact of these projects, like the creation of biological corridors, but few countries
demonstrate such concern and foresight. Frequently, when certain species are exploited
commercially, little attention is paid to studying their reproductive patterns in order to prevent their
depletion and the consequent imbalance of the ecosystem.
36. Caring for ecosystems demands far-sightedness, since no one looking for quick and easy
profit is truly interested in their preservation. But the cost of the damage caused by such selfish
lack of concern is much greater than the economic benefits to be obtained. Where certain species
are destroyed or seriously harmed, the values involved are incalculable. We can be silent
witnesses to terrible injustices if we think that we can obtain significant benefits by making the rest
of humanity, present and future, pay the extremely high costs of environmental deterioration.
37. Some countries have made significant progress in establishing sanctuaries on land and in the
oceans where any human intervention is prohibited which might modify their features or alter their
original structures. In the protection of biodiversity, specialists insist on the need for particular
attention to be shown to areas richer both in the number of species and in endemic, rare or less
protected species. Certain places need greater protection because of their immense importance
for the global ecosystem, or because they represent important water reserves and thus safeguard
other forms of life.
38. Let us mention, for example, those richly biodiverse lungs of our planet which are the Amazon
and the Congo basins, or the great aquifers and glaciers. We know how important these are for
the entire earth and for the future of humanity. The ecosystems of tropical forests possess an
enormously complex biodiversity which is almost impossible to appreciate fully, yet when these
forests are burned down or levelled for purposes of cultivation, within the space of a few years
countless species are lost and the areas frequently become arid wastelands. A delicate balance
has to be maintained when speaking about these places, for we cannot overlook the huge global
economic interests which, under the guise of protecting them, can undermine the sovereignty of

2.2 Page 12

▲back to top
12
individual nations. In fact, there are “proposals to internationalize the Amazon, which only serve
the economic interests of transnational corporations”.[24] We cannot fail to praise the commitment
of international agencies and civil society organizations which draw public attention to these issues
and offer critical cooperation, employing legitimate means of pressure, to ensure that each
government carries out its proper and inalienable responsibility to preserve its country’s
environment and natural resources, without capitulating to spurious local or international interests.
39. The replacement of virgin forest with plantations of trees, usually monocultures, is rarely
adequately analyzed. Yet this can seriously compromise a biodiversity which the new species
being introduced does not accommodate. Similarly, wetlands converted into cultivated land lose
the enormous biodiversity which they formerly hosted. In some coastal areas the disappearance of
ecosystems sustained by mangrove swamps is a source of serious concern.
40. Oceans not only contain the bulk of our planet’s water supply, but also most of the immense
variety of living creatures, many of them still unknown to us and threatened for various reasons.
What is more, marine life in rivers, lakes, seas and oceans, which feeds a great part of the world’s
population, is affected by uncontrolled fishing, leading to a drastic depletion of certain species.
Selective forms of fishing which discard much of what they collect continue unabated. Particularly
threatened are marine organisms which we tend to overlook, like some forms of plankton; they
represent a significant element in the ocean food chain, and species used for our food ultimately
depend on them.
41. In tropical and subtropical seas, we find coral reefs comparable to the great forests on dry
land, for they shelter approximately a million species, including fish, crabs, molluscs, sponges and
algae. Many of the world’s coral reefs are already barren or in a state of constant decline. “Who
turned the wonderworld of the seas into underwater cemeteries bereft of colour and life?”[25] This
phenomenon is due largely to pollution which reaches the sea as the result of deforestation,
agricultural monocultures, industrial waste and destructive fishing methods, especially those using
cyanide and dynamite. It is aggravated by the rise in temperature of the oceans. All of this helps
us to see that every intervention in nature can have consequences which are not immediately
evident, and that certain ways of exploiting resources prove costly in terms of degradation which
ultimately reaches the ocean bed itself.
42. Greater investment needs to be made in research aimed at understanding more fully the
functioning of ecosystems and adequately analyzing the different variables associated with any
significant modification of the environment. Because all creatures are connected, each must be
cherished with love and respect, for all of us as living creatures are dependent on one another.
Each area is responsible for the care of this family. This will require undertaking a careful inventory
of the species which it hosts, with a view to developing programmes and strategies of protection
with particular care for safeguarding species heading towards extinction.

2.3 Page 13

▲back to top
13
IV. DECLINE IN THE QUALITY OF HUMAN LIFE AND THE BREAKDOWN OF SOCIETY
43. Human beings too are creatures of this world, enjoying a right to life and happiness, and
endowed with unique dignity. So we cannot fail to consider the effects on people’s lives of
environmental deterioration, current models of development and the throwaway culture.
44. Nowadays, for example, we are conscious of the disproportionate and unruly growth of many
cities, which have become unhealthy to live in, not only because of pollution caused by toxic
emissions but also as a result of urban chaos, poor transportation, and visual pollution and noise.
Many cities are huge, inefficient structures, excessively wasteful of energy and water.
Neighbourhoods, even those recently built, are congested, chaotic and lacking in sufficient green
space. We were not meant to be inundated by cement, asphalt, glass and metal, and deprived of
physical contact with nature.
45. In some places, rural and urban alike, the privatization of certain spaces has restricted
people’s access to places of particular beauty. In others, “ecological” neighbourhoods have been
created which are closed to outsiders in order to ensure an artificial tranquillity. Frequently, we find
beautiful and carefully manicured green spaces in so-called “safer” areas of cities, but not in the
more hidden areas where the disposable of society live.
46. The social dimensions of global change include the effects of technological innovations on
employment, social exclusion, an inequitable distribution and consumption of energy and other
services, social breakdown, increased violence and a rise in new forms of social aggression, drug
trafficking, growing drug use by young people, and the loss of identity. These are signs that the
growth of the past two centuries has not always led to an integral development and an
improvement in the quality of life. Some of these signs are also symptomatic of real social decline,
the silent rupture of the bonds of integration and social cohesion.
47. Furthermore, when media and the digital world become omnipresent, their influence can stop
people from learning how to live wisely, to think deeply and to love generously. In this context, the
great sages of the past run the risk of going unheard amid the noise and distractions of an
information overload. Efforts need to be made to help these media become sources of new
cultural progress for humanity and not a threat to our deepest riches. True wisdom, as the fruit of
self-examination, dialogue and generous encounter between persons, is not acquired by a mere
accumulation of data which eventually leads to overload and confusion, a sort of mental pollution.
Real relationships with others, with all the challenges they entail, now tend to be replaced by a
type of internet communication which enables us to choose or eliminate relationships at whim,
thus giving rise to a new type of contrived emotion which has more to do with devices and displays
than with other people and with nature. Today’s media do enable us to communicate and to share
our knowledge and affections. Yet at times they also shield us from direct contact with the pain,
the fears and the joys of others and the complexity of their personal experiences. For this reason,

2.4 Page 14

▲back to top
14
we should be concerned that, alongside the exciting possibilities offered by these media, a deep
and melancholic dissatisfaction with interpersonal relations, or a harmful sense of isolation, can
also arise.
V. GLOBAL INEQUALITY
48. The human environment and the natural environment deteriorate together; we cannot
adequately combat environmental degradation unless we attend to causes related to human and
social degradation. In fact, the deterioration of the environment and of society affects the most
vulnerable people on the planet: “Both everyday experience and scientific research show that the
gravest effects of all attacks on the environment are suffered by the poorest”.[26] For example, the
depletion of fishing reserves especially hurts small fishing communities without the means to
replace those resources; water pollution particularly affects the poor who cannot buy bottled water;
and rises in the sea level mainly affect impoverished coastal populations who have nowhere else
to go. The impact of present imbalances is also seen in the premature death of many of the poor,
in conflicts sparked by the shortage of resources, and in any number of other problems which are
insufficiently represented on global agendas.[27]
49. It needs to be said that, generally speaking, there is little in the way of clear awareness of
problems which especially affect the excluded. Yet they are the majority of the planet’s population,
billions of people. These days, they are mentioned in international political and economic
discussions, but one often has the impression that their problems are brought up as an
afterthought, a question which gets added almost out of duty or in a tangential way, if not treated
merely as collateral damage. Indeed, when all is said and done, they frequently remain at the
bottom of the pile. This is due partly to the fact that many professionals, opinion makers,
communications media and centres of power, being located in affluent urban areas, are far
removed from the poor, with little direct contact with their problems. They live and reason from the
comfortable position of a high level of development and a quality of life well beyond the reach of
the majority of the world’s population. This lack of physical contact and encounter, encouraged at
times by the disintegration of our cities, can lead to a numbing of conscience and to tendentious
analyses which neglect parts of reality. At times this attitude exists side by side with a “green”
rhetoric. Today, however, we have to realize that a true ecological approach always becomes a
social approach; it must integrate questions of justice in debates on the environment, so as to hear
both the cry of the earth and the cry of the poor.
50. Instead of resolving the problems of the poor and thinking of how the world can be different,
some can only propose a reduction in the birth rate. At times, developing countries face forms of
international pressure which make economic assistance contingent on certain policies of
“reproductive health”. Yet “while it is true that an unequal distribution of the population and of
available resources creates obstacles to development and a sustainable use of the environment, it
must nonetheless be recognized that demographic growth is fully compatible with an integral and

2.5 Page 15

▲back to top
15
shared development”.[28] To blame population growth instead of extreme and selective
consumerism on the part of some, is one way of refusing to face the issues. It is an attempt to
legitimize the present model of distribution, where a minority believes that it has the right to
consume in a way which can never be universalized, since the planet could not even contain the
waste products of such consumption. Besides, we know that approximately a third of all food
produced is discarded, and “whenever food is thrown out it is as if it were stolen from the table of
the poor”.[29] Still, attention needs to be paid to imbalances in population density, on both national
and global levels, since a rise in consumption would lead to complex regional situations, as a
result of the interplay between problems linked to environmental pollution, transport, waste
treatment, loss of resources and quality of life.
51. Inequity affects not only individuals but entire countries; it compels us to consider an ethics of
international relations. A true “ecological debt” exists, particularly between the global north and
south, connected to commercial imbalances with effects on the environment, and the
disproportionate use of natural resources by certain countries over long periods of time. The
export of raw materials to satisfy markets in the industrialized north has caused harm locally, as
for example in mercury pollution in gold mining or sulphur dioxide pollution in copper mining. There
is a pressing need to calculate the use of environmental space throughout the world for depositing
gas residues which have been accumulating for two centuries and have created a situation which
currently affects all the countries of the world. The warming caused by huge consumption on the
part of some rich countries has repercussions on the poorest areas of the world, especially Africa,
where a rise in temperature, together with drought, has proved devastating for farming. There is
also the damage caused by the export of solid waste and toxic liquids to developing countries, and
by the pollution produced by companies which operate in less developed countries in ways they
could never do at home, in the countries in which they raise their capital: “We note that often the
businesses which operate this way are multinationals. They do here what they would never do in
developed countries or the so-called first world. Generally, after ceasing their activity and
withdrawing, they leave behind great human and environmental liabilities such as unemployment,
abandoned towns, the depletion of natural reserves, deforestation, the impoverishment of
agriculture and local stock breeding, open pits, riven hills, polluted rivers and a handful of social
works which are no longer sustainable”.[30]
52. The foreign debt of poor countries has become a way of controlling them, yet this is not the
case where ecological debt is concerned. In different ways, developing countries, where the most
important reserves of the biosphere are found, continue to fuel the development of richer countries
at the cost of their own present and future. The land of the southern poor is rich and mostly
unpolluted, yet access to ownership of goods and resources for meeting vital needs is inhibited by
a system of commercial relations and ownership which is structurally perverse. The developed
countries ought to help pay this debt by significantly limiting their consumption of non-renewable
energy and by assisting poorer countries to support policies and programmes of sustainable
development. The poorest areas and countries are less capable of adopting new models for

2.6 Page 16

▲back to top
16
reducing environmental impact because they lack the wherewithal to develop the necessary
processes and to cover their costs. We must continue to be aware that, regarding climate change,
there are differentiated responsibilities. As the United States bishops have said, greater attention
must be given to “the needs of the poor, the weak and the vulnerable, in a debate often dominated
by more powerful interests”.[31] We need to strengthen the conviction that we are one single
human family. There are no frontiers or barriers, political or social, behind which we can hide, still
less is there room for the globalization of indifference.
VI. WEAK RESPONSES
53. These situations have caused sister earth, along with all the abandoned of our world, to cry
out, pleading that we take another course. Never have we so hurt and mistreated our common
home as we have in the last two hundred years. Yet we are called to be instruments of God our
Father, so that our planet might be what he desired when he created it and correspond with his
plan for peace, beauty and fullness. The problem is that we still lack the culture needed to confront
this crisis. We lack leadership capable of striking out on new paths and meeting the needs of the
present with concern for all and without prejudice towards coming generations. The establishment
of a legal framework which can set clear boundaries and ensure the protection of ecosystems has
become indispensable; otherwise, the new power structures based on the techno-economic
paradigm may overwhelm not only our politics but also freedom and justice.
54. It is remarkable how weak international political responses have been. The failure of global
summits on the environment make it plain that our politics are subject to technology and finance.
There are too many special interests, and economic interests easily end up trumping the common
good and manipulating information so that their own plans will not be affected. The Aparecida
Document urges that “the interests of economic groups which irrationally demolish sources of life
should not prevail in dealing with natural resources”.[32] The alliance between the economy and
technology ends up sidelining anything unrelated to its immediate interests. Consequently the
most one can expect is superficial rhetoric, sporadic acts of philanthropy and perfunctory
expressions of concern for the environment, whereas any genuine attempt by groups within
society to introduce change is viewed as a nuisance based on romantic illusions or an obstacle to
be circumvented.
55. Some countries are gradually making significant progress, developing more effective controls
and working to combat corruption. People may well have a growing ecological sensitivity but it has
not succeeded in changing their harmful habits of consumption which, rather than decreasing,
appear to be growing all the more. A simple example is the increasing use and power of air-
conditioning. The markets, which immediately benefit from sales, stimulate ever greater demand.
An outsider looking at our world would be amazed at such behaviour, which at times appears self-
destructive.

2.7 Page 17

▲back to top
17
56. In the meantime, economic powers continue to justify the current global system where priority
tends to be given to speculation and the pursuit of financial gain, which fail to take the context into
account, let alone the effects on human dignity and the natural environment. Here we see how
environmental deterioration and human and ethical degradation are closely linked. Many people
will deny doing anything wrong because distractions constantly dull our consciousness of just how
limited and finite our world really is. As a result, “whatever is fragile, like the environment, is
defenceless before the interests of a deified market, which become the only rule”.[33]
57. It is foreseeable that, once certain resources have been depleted, the scene will be set for new
wars, albeit under the guise of noble claims. War always does grave harm to the environment and
to the cultural riches of peoples, risks which are magnified when one considers nuclear arms and
biological weapons. “Despite the international agreements which prohibit chemical, bacteriological
and biological warfare, the fact is that laboratory research continues to develop new offensive
weapons capable of altering the balance of nature”.[34] Politics must pay greater attention to
foreseeing new conflicts and addressing the causes which can lead to them. But powerful financial
interests prove most resistant to this effort, and political planning tends to lack breadth of vision.
What would induce anyone, at this stage, to hold on to power only to be remembered for their
inability to take action when it was urgent and necessary to do so?
58. In some countries, there are positive examples of environmental improvement: rivers, polluted
for decades, have been cleaned up; native woodlands have been restored; landscapes have been
beautified thanks to environmental renewal projects; beautiful buildings have been erected;
advances have been made in the production of non-polluting energy and in the improvement of
public transportation. These achievements do not solve global problems, but they do show that
men and women are still capable of intervening positively. For all our limitations, gestures of
generosity, solidarity and care cannot but well up within us, since we were made for love.
59. At the same time we can note the rise of a false or superficial ecology which bolsters
complacency and a cheerful recklessness. As often occurs in periods of deep crisis which require
bold decisions, we are tempted to think that what is happening is not entirely clear. Superficially,
apart from a few obvious signs of pollution and deterioration, things do not look that serious, and
the planet could continue as it is for some time. Such evasiveness serves as a licence to carrying
on with our present lifestyles and models of production and consumption. This is the way human
beings contrive to feed their self-destructive vices: trying not to see them, trying not to
acknowledge them, delaying the important decisions and pretending that nothing will happen.
VII. A VARIETY OF OPINIONS
60. Finally, we need to acknowledge that different approaches and lines of thought have emerged
regarding this situation and its possible solutions. At one extreme, we find those who doggedly
uphold the myth of progress and tell us that ecological problems will solve themselves simply with

2.8 Page 18

▲back to top
18
the application of new technology and without any need for ethical considerations or deep change.
At the other extreme are those who view men and women and all their interventions as no more
than a threat, jeopardizing the global ecosystem, and consequently the presence of human beings
on the planet should be reduced and all forms of intervention prohibited. Viable future scenarios
will have to be generated between these extremes, since there is no one path to a solution. This
makes a variety of proposals possible, all capable of entering into dialogue with a view to
developing comprehensive solutions.
61. On many concrete questions, the Church has no reason to offer a definitive opinion; she
knows that honest debate must be encouraged among experts, while respecting divergent views.
But we need only take a frank look at the facts to see that our common home is falling into serious
disrepair. Hope would have us recognize that there is always a way out, that we can always
redirect our steps, that we can always do something to solve our problems. Still, we can see signs
that things are now reaching a breaking point, due to the rapid pace of change and degradation;
these are evident in large-scale natural disasters as well as social and even financial crises, for
the world’s problems cannot be analyzed or explained in isolation. There are regions now at high
risk and, aside from all doomsday predictions, the present world system is certainly unsustainable
from a number of points of view, for we have stopped thinking about the goals of human activity. “If
we scan the regions of our planet, we immediately see that humanity has disappointed God’s
expectations”.[35]
CHAPTER TWO
THE GOSPEL OF CREATION
62. Why should this document, addressed to all people of good will, include a chapter dealing with
the convictions of believers? I am well aware that in the areas of politics and philosophy there are
those who firmly reject the idea of a Creator, or consider it irrelevant, and consequently dismiss as
irrational the rich contribution which religions can make towards an integral ecology and the full
development of humanity. Others view religions simply as a subculture to be tolerated.
Nonetheless, science and religion, with their distinctive approaches to understanding reality, can
enter into an intense dialogue fruitful for both.
I. THE LIGHT OFFERED BY FAITH
63. Given the complexity of the ecological crisis and its multiple causes, we need to realize that
the solutions will not emerge from just one way of interpreting and transforming reality. Respect
must also be shown for the various cultural riches of different peoples, their art and poetry, their
interior life and spirituality. If we are truly concerned to develop an ecology capable of remedying
the damage we have done, no branch of the sciences and no form of wisdom can be left out, and
that includes religion and the language particular to it. The Catholic Church is open to dialogue

2.9 Page 19

▲back to top
19
with philosophical thought; this has enabled her to produce various syntheses between faith and
reason. The development of the Church’s social teaching represents such a synthesis with regard
to social issues; this teaching is called to be enriched by taking up new challenges.
64. Furthermore, although this Encyclical welcomes dialogue with everyone so that together we
can seek paths of liberation, I would like from the outset to show how faith convictions can offer
Christians, and some other believers as well, ample motivation to care for nature and for the most
vulnerable of their brothers and sisters. If the simple fact of being human moves people to care for
the environment of which they are a part, Christians in their turn “realize that their responsibility
within creation, and their duty towards nature and the Creator, are an essential part of their
faith”.[36] It is good for humanity and the world at large when we believers better recognize the
ecological commitments which stem from our convictions.
II. THE WISDOM OF THE BIBLICAL ACCOUNTS
65. Without repeating the entire theology of creation, we can ask what the great biblical narratives
say about the relationship of human beings with the world. In the first creation account in the Book
of Genesis, God’s plan includes creating humanity. After the creation of man and woman, “God
saw everything that he had made, and behold it was very good” (Gen 1:31). The Bible teaches
that every man and woman is created out of love and made in God’s image and likeness (cf. Gen
1:26). This shows us the immense dignity of each person, “who is not just something, but
someone. He is capable of self-knowledge, of self-possession and of freely giving himself and
entering into communion with other persons”.[37] Saint John Paul II stated that the special love of
the Creator for each human being “confers upon him or her an infinite dignity”.[38] Those who are
committed to defending human dignity can find in the Christian faith the deepest reasons for this
commitment. How wonderful is the certainty that each human life is not adrift in the midst of
hopeless chaos, in a world ruled by pure chance or endlessly recurring cycles! The Creator can
say to each one of us: “Before I formed you in the womb, I knew you” (Jer 1:5). We were
conceived in the heart of God, and for this reason “each of us is the result of a thought of God.
Each of us is willed, each of us is loved, each of us is necessary”.[39]
66. The creation accounts in the book of Genesis contain, in their own symbolic and narrative
language, profound teachings about human existence and its historical reality. They suggest that
human life is grounded in three fundamental and closely intertwined relationships: with God, with
our neighbour and with the earth itself. According to the Bible, these three vital relationships have
been broken, both outwardly and within us. This rupture is sin. The harmony between the Creator,
humanity and creation as a whole was disrupted by our presuming to take the place of God and
refusing to acknowledge our creaturely limitations. This in turn distorted our mandate to “have
dominion” over the earth (cf. Gen 1:28), to “till it and keep it” (Gen 2:15). As a result, the originally
harmonious relationship between human beings and nature became conflictual (cf. Gen 3:17-19).
It is significant that the harmony which Saint Francis of Assisi experienced with all creatures was

2.10 Page 20

▲back to top
20
seen as a healing of that rupture. Saint Bonaventure held that, through universal reconciliation
with every creature, Saint Francis in some way returned to the state of original innocence.[40] This
is a far cry from our situation today, where sin is manifest in all its destructive power in wars, the
various forms of violence and abuse, the abandonment of the most vulnerable, and attacks on
nature.
67. We are not God. The earth was here before us and it has been given to us. This allows us to
respond to the charge that Judaeo-Christian thinking, on the basis of the Genesis account which
grants man “dominion” over the earth (cf. Gen 1:28), has encouraged the unbridled exploitation of
nature by painting him as domineering and destructive by nature. This is not a correct
interpretation of the Bible as understood by the Church. Although it is true that we Christians have
at times incorrectly interpreted the Scriptures, nowadays we must forcefully reject the notion that
our being created in God’s image and given dominion over the earth justifies absolute domination
over other creatures. The biblical texts are to be read in their context, with an appropriate
hermeneutic, recognizing that they tell us to “till and keep” the garden of the world (cf. Gen 2:15).
“Tilling” refers to cultivating, ploughing or working, while “keeping” means caring, protecting,
overseeing and preserving. This implies a relationship of mutual responsibility between human
beings and nature. Each community can take from the bounty of the earth whatever it needs for
subsistence, but it also has the duty to protect the earth and to ensure its fruitfulness for coming
generations. “The earth is the Lord’s” (Ps 24:1); to him belongs “the earth with all that is within it”
(Dt 10:14). Thus God rejects every claim to absolute ownership: “The land shall not be sold in
perpetuity, for the land is mine; for you are strangers and sojourners with me” (Lev 25:23).
68. This responsibility for God’s earth means that human beings, endowed with intelligence, must
respect the laws of nature and the delicate equilibria existing between the creatures of this world,
for “he commanded and they were created; and he established them for ever and ever; he fixed
their bounds and he set a law which cannot pass away” (Ps 148:5b-6). The laws found in the Bible
dwell on relationships, not only among individuals but also with other living beings. “You shall not
see your brother’s donkey or his ox fallen down by the way and withhold your help… If you chance
to come upon a bird’s nest in any tree or on the ground, with young ones or eggs and the mother
sitting upon the young or upon the eggs; you shall not take the mother with the young” (Dt 22:4, 6).
Along these same lines, rest on the seventh day is meant not only for human beings, but also so
“that your ox and your donkey may have rest” (Ex 23:12). Clearly, the Bible has no place for a
tyrannical anthropocentrism unconcerned for other creatures.
69. Together with our obligation to use the earth’s goods responsibly, we are called to recognize
that other living beings have a value of their own in God’s eyes: “by their mere existence they
bless him and give him glory”,[41] and indeed, “the Lord rejoices in all his works” (Ps 104:31). By
virtue of our unique dignity and our gift of intelligence, we are called to respect creation and its
inherent laws, for “the Lord by wisdom founded the earth” (Prov 3:19). In our time, the Church
does not simply state that other creatures are completely subordinated to the good of human

3 Pages 21-30

▲back to top

3.1 Page 21

▲back to top
21
beings, as if they have no worth in themselves and can be treated as we wish. The German
bishops have taught that, where other creatures are concerned, “we can speak of the priority of
being over that of being useful”.[42] The Catechism clearly and forcefully criticizes a distorted
anthropocentrism: “Each creature possesses its own particular goodness and perfection… Each of
the various creatures, willed in its own being, reflects in its own way a ray of God’s infinite wisdom
and goodness. Man must therefore respect the particular goodness of every creature, to avoid any
disordered use of things”.[43]
70. In the story of Cain and Abel, we see how envy led Cain to commit the ultimate injustice
against his brother, which in turn ruptured the relationship between Cain and God, and between
Cain and the earth from which he was banished. This is seen clearly in the dramatic exchange
between God and Cain. God asks: “Where is Abel your brother?” Cain answers that he does not
know, and God persists: “What have you done? The voice of your brother’s blood is crying to me
from the ground. And now you are cursed from the ground” (Gen 4:9-11). Disregard for the duty to
cultivate and maintain a proper relationship with my neighbour, for whose care and custody I am
responsible, ruins my relationship with my own self, with others, with God and with the earth.
When all these relationships are neglected, when justice no longer dwells in the land, the Bible
tells us that life itself is endangered. We see this in the story of Noah, where God threatens to do
away with humanity because of its constant failure to fulfil the requirements of justice and peace: “I
have determined to make an end of all flesh; for the earth is filled with violence through them”
(Gen 6:13). These ancient stories, full of symbolism, bear witness to a conviction which we today
share, that everything is interconnected, and that genuine care for our own lives and our
relationships with nature is inseparable from fraternity, justice and faithfulness to others.
71. Although “the wickedness of man was great in the earth” (Gen 6:5) and the Lord “was sorry
that he had made man on the earth” (Gen 6:6), nonetheless, through Noah, who remained
innocent and just, God decided to open a path of salvation. In this way he gave humanity the
chance of a new beginning. All it takes is one good person to restore hope! The biblical tradition
clearly shows that this renewal entails recovering and respecting the rhythms inscribed in nature
by the hand of the Creator. We see this, for example, in the law of the Sabbath. On the seventh
day, God rested from all his work. He commanded Israel to set aside each seventh day as a day
of rest, a Sabbath, (cf. Gen 2:2-3; Ex 16:23; 20:10). Similarly, every seven years, a sabbatical year
was set aside for Israel, a complete rest for the land (cf. Lev 25:1-4), when sowing was forbidden
and one reaped only what was necessary to live on and to feed one’s household (cf. Lev 25:4-6).
Finally, after seven weeks of years, which is to say forty-nine years, the Jubilee was celebrated as
a year of general forgiveness and “liberty throughout the land for all its inhabitants” (cf. Lev 25:10).
This law came about as an attempt to ensure balance and fairness in their relationships with
others and with the land on which they lived and worked. At the same time, it was an
acknowledgment that the gift of the earth with its fruits belongs to everyone. Those who tilled and
kept the land were obliged to share its fruits, especially with the poor, with widows, orphans and
foreigners in their midst: “When you reap the harvest of your land, you shall not reap your field to

3.2 Page 22

▲back to top
22
its very border, neither shall you gather the gleanings after the harvest. And you shall not strip
your vineyard bare, neither shall you gather the fallen grapes of your vineyard; you shall leave
them for the poor and for the sojourner” (Lev 19:9-10).
72. The Psalms frequently exhort us to praise God the Creator, “who spread out the earth on the
waters, for his steadfast love endures for ever” (Ps 136:6). They also invite other creatures to join
us in this praise: “Praise him, sun and moon, praise him, all you shining stars! Praise him, you
highest heavens, and you waters above the heavens! Let them praise the name of the Lord, for he
commanded and they were created” (Ps 148:3-5). We do not only exist by God’s mighty power;
we also live with him and beside him. This is why we adore him.
73. The writings of the prophets invite us to find renewed strength in times of trial by contemplating
the all-powerful God who created the universe. Yet God’s infinite power does not lead us to flee
his fatherly tenderness, because in him affection and strength are joined. Indeed, all sound
spirituality entails both welcoming divine love and adoration, confident in the Lord because of his
infinite power. In the Bible, the God who liberates and saves is the same God who created the
universe, and these two divine ways of acting are intimately and inseparably connected: “Ah Lord
God! It is you who made the heavens and the earth by your great power and by your outstretched
arm! Nothing is too hard for you… You brought your people Israel out of the land of Egypt with
signs and wonders” (Jer 32:17, 21). “The Lord is the everlasting God, the Creator of the ends of
the earth. He does not faint or grow weary; his understanding is unsearchable. He gives power to
the faint, and strengthens the powerless” (Is 40:28b-29).
74. The experience of the Babylonian captivity provoked a spiritual crisis which led to deeper faith
in God. Now his creative omnipotence was given pride of place in order to exhort the people to
regain their hope in the midst of their wretched predicament. Centuries later, in another age of trial
and persecution, when the Roman Empire was seeking to impose absolute dominion, the faithful
would once again find consolation and hope in a growing trust in the all-powerful God: “Great and
wonderful are your deeds, O Lord God the Almighty! Just and true are your ways!” (Rev 15:3). The
God who created the universe out of nothing can also intervene in this world and overcome every
form of evil. Injustice is not invincible.
75. A spirituality which forgets God as all-powerful and Creator is not acceptable. That is how we
end up worshipping earthly powers, or ourselves usurping the place of God, even to the point of
claiming an unlimited right to trample his creation underfoot. The best way to restore men and
women to their rightful place, putting an end to their claim to absolute dominion over the earth, is
to speak once more of the figure of a Father who creates and who alone owns the world.
Otherwise, human beings will always try to impose their own laws and interests on reality.
III. THE MYSTERY OF THE UNIVERSE

3.3 Page 23

▲back to top
23
76. In the Judaeo-Christian tradition, the word “creation” has a broader meaning than “nature”, for
it has to do with God’s loving plan in which every creature has its own value and significance.
Nature is usually seen as a system which can be studied, understood and controlled, whereas
creation can only be understood as a gift from the outstretched hand of the Father of all, and as a
reality illuminated by the love which calls us together into universal communion.
77. “By the word of the Lord the heavens were made” (Ps 33:6). This tells us that the world came
about as the result of a decision, not from chaos or chance, and this exalts it all the more. The
creating word expresses a free choice. The universe did not emerge as the result of arbitrary
omnipotence, a show of force or a desire for self-assertion. Creation is of the order of love. God’s
love is the fundamental moving force in all created things: “For you love all things that exist, and
detest none of the things that you have made; for you would not have made anything if you had
hated it” (Wis 11:24). Every creature is thus the object of the Father’s tenderness, who gives it its
place in the world. Even the fleeting life of the least of beings is the object of his love, and in its
few seconds of existence, God enfolds it with his affection. Saint Basil the Great described the
Creator as “goodness without measure”,[44] while Dante Alighieri spoke of “the love which moves
the sun and the stars”.[45] Consequently, we can ascend from created things “to the greatness of
God and to his loving mercy”.[46]
78. At the same time, Judaeo-Christian thought demythologized nature. While continuing to
admire its grandeur and immensity, it no longer saw nature as divine. In doing so, it emphasizes
all the more our human responsibility for nature. This rediscovery of nature can never be at the
cost of the freedom and responsibility of human beings who, as part of the world, have the duty to
cultivate their abilities in order to protect it and develop its potential. If we acknowledge the value
and the fragility of nature and, at the same time, our God-given abilities, we can finally leave
behind the modern myth of unlimited material progress. A fragile world, entrusted by God to
human care, challenges us to devise intelligent ways of directing, developing and limiting our
power.
79. In this universe, shaped by open and intercommunicating systems, we can discern countless
forms of relationship and participation. This leads us to think of the whole as open to God’s
transcendence, within which it develops. Faith allows us to interpret the meaning and the
mysterious beauty of what is unfolding. We are free to apply our intelligence towards things
evolving positively, or towards adding new ills, new causes of suffering and real setbacks. This is
what makes for the excitement and drama of human history, in which freedom, growth, salvation
and love can blossom, or lead towards decadence and mutual destruction. The work of the Church
seeks not only to remind everyone of the duty to care for nature, but at the same time “she must
above all protect mankind from self-destruction”.[47]
80. Yet God, who wishes to work with us and who counts on our cooperation, can also bring good
out of the evil we have done. “The Holy Spirit can be said to possess an infinite creativity, proper

3.4 Page 24

▲back to top
24
to the divine mind, which knows how to loosen the knots of human affairs, including the most
complex and inscrutable”.[48] Creating a world in need of development, God in some way sought
to limit himself in such a way that many of the things we think of as evils, dangers or sources of
suffering, are in reality part of the pains of childbirth which he uses to draw us into the act of
cooperation with the Creator.[49] God is intimately present to each being, without impinging on the
autonomy of his creature, and this gives rise to the rightful autonomy of earthly affairs.[50] His
divine presence, which ensures the subsistence and growth of each being, “continues the work of
creation”.[51] The Spirit of God has filled the universe with possibilities and therefore, from the
very heart of things, something new can always emerge: “Nature is nothing other than a certain
kind of art, namely God’s art, impressed upon things, whereby those things are moved to a
determinate end. It is as if a shipbuilder were able to give timbers the wherewithal to move
themselves to take the form of a ship”.[52]
81. Human beings, even if we postulate a process of evolution, also possess a uniqueness which
cannot be fully explained by the evolution of other open systems. Each of us has his or her own
personal identity and is capable of entering into dialogue with others and with God himself. Our
capacity to reason, to develop arguments, to be inventive, to interpret reality and to create art,
along with other not yet discovered capacities, are signs of a uniqueness which transcends the
spheres of physics and biology. The sheer novelty involved in the emergence of a personal being
within a material universe presupposes a direct action of God and a particular call to life and to
relationship on the part of a “Thou” who addresses himself to another “thou”. The biblical accounts
of creation invite us to see each human being as a subject who can never be reduced to the status
of an object.
82. Yet it would also be mistaken to view other living beings as mere objects subjected to arbitrary
human domination. When nature is viewed solely as a source of profit and gain, this has serious
consequences for society. This vision of “might is right” has engendered immense inequality,
injustice and acts of violence against the majority of humanity, since resources end up in the
hands of the first comer or the most powerful: the winner takes all. Completely at odds with this
model are the ideals of harmony, justice, fraternity and peace as proposed by Jesus. As he said of
the powers of his own age: “You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their
great men exercise authority over them. It shall not be so among you; but whoever would be great
among you must be your servant” (Mt 20:25-26).
83. The ultimate destiny of the universe is in the fullness of God, which has already been attained
by the risen Christ, the measure of the maturity of all things.[53] Here we can add yet another
argument for rejecting every tyrannical and irresponsible domination of human beings over other
creatures. The ultimate purpose of other creatures is not to be found in us. Rather, all creatures
are moving forward with us and through us towards a common point of arrival, which is God, in
that transcendent fullness where the risen Christ embraces and illumines all things. Human
beings, endowed with intelligence and love, and drawn by the fullness of Christ, are called to lead

3.5 Page 25

▲back to top
25
all creatures back to their Creator.
IV. THE MESSAGE OF EACH CREATURE IN THE HARMONY OF CREATION
84. Our insistence that each human being is an image of God should not make us overlook the
fact that each creature has its own purpose. None is superfluous. The entire material universe
speaks of God’s love, his boundless affection for us. Soil, water, mountains: everything is, as it
were, a caress of God. The history of our friendship with God is always linked to particular places
which take on an intensely personal meaning; we all remember places, and revisiting those
memories does us much good. Anyone who has grown up in the hills or used to sit by the spring to
drink, or played outdoors in the neighbourhood square; going back to these places is a chance to
recover something of their true selves.
85. God has written a precious book, “whose letters are the multitude of created things present in
the universe”.[54] The Canadian bishops rightly pointed out that no creature is excluded from this
manifestation of God: “From panoramic vistas to the tiniest living form, nature is a constant source
of wonder and awe. It is also a continuing revelation of the divine”.[55] The bishops of Japan, for
their part, made a thought-provoking observation: “To sense each creature singing the hymn of its
existence is to live joyfully in God’s love and hope”.[56] This contemplation of creation allows us to
discover in each thing a teaching which God wishes to hand on to us, since “for the believer, to
contemplate creation is to hear a message, to listen to a paradoxical and silent voice”.[57] We can
say that “alongside revelation properly so-called, contained in sacred Scripture, there is a divine
manifestation in the blaze of the sun and the fall of night”.[58] Paying attention to this
manifestation, we learn to see ourselves in relation to all other creatures: “I express myself in
expressing the world; in my effort to decipher the sacredness of the world, I explore my own”.[59]
86. The universe as a whole, in all its manifold relationships, shows forth the inexhaustible riches
of God. Saint Thomas Aquinas wisely noted that multiplicity and variety “come from the intention of
the first agent” who willed that “what was wanting to one in the representation of the divine
goodness might be supplied by another”,[60] inasmuch as God’s goodness “could not be
represented fittingly by any one creature”.[61] Hence we need to grasp the variety of things in their
multiple relationships.[62] We understand better the importance and meaning of each creature if
we contemplate it within the entirety of God’s plan. As the Catechism teaches: “God wills the
interdependence of creatures. The sun and the moon, the cedar and the little flower, the eagle and
the sparrow: the spectacle of their countless diversities and inequalities tells us that no creature is
self-sufficient. Creatures exist only in dependence on each other, to complete each other, in the
service of each other”.[63]
87. When we can see God reflected in all that exists, our hearts are moved to praise the Lord for
all his creatures and to worship him in union with them. This sentiment finds magnificent
expression in the hymn of Saint Francis of Assisi:

3.6 Page 26

▲back to top
26
Praised be you, my Lord, with all your creatures,
especially Sir Brother Sun,
who is the day and through whom you give us light.
And he is beautiful and radiant with great splendour;
and bears a likeness of you, Most High.
Praised be you, my Lord, through Sister Moon and the stars,
in heaven you formed them clear and precious and beautiful.
Praised be you, my Lord, through Brother Wind,
and through the air, cloudy and serene, and every kind of weather
through whom you give sustenance to your creatures.
Praised be you, my Lord, through Sister Water,
who is very useful and humble and precious and chaste.
Praised be you, my Lord, through Brother Fire,
through whom you light the night,
and he is beautiful and playful and robust and strong”.[64]
88. The bishops of Brazil have pointed out that nature as a whole not only manifests God but is
also a locus of his presence. The Spirit of life dwells in every living creature and calls us to enter
into relationship with him.[65] Discovering this presence leads us to cultivate the “ecological
virtues”.[66] This is not to forget that there is an infinite distance between God and the things of
this world, which do not possess his fullness. Otherwise, we would not be doing the creatures
themselves any good either, for we would be failing to acknowledge their right and proper place.
We would end up unduly demanding of them something which they, in their smallness, cannot
give us.
V. A UNIVERSAL COMMUNION
89. The created things of this world are not free of ownership: “For they are yours, O Lord, who
love the living” (Wis 11:26). This is the basis of our conviction that, as part of the universe, called
into being by one Father, all of us are linked by unseen bonds and together form a kind of
universal family, a sublime communion which fills us with a sacred, affectionate and humble
respect. Here I would reiterate that “God has joined us so closely to the world around us that we
can feel the desertification of the soil almost as a physical ailment, and the extinction of a species
as a painful disfigurement”.[67]
90. This is not to put all living beings on the same level nor to deprive human beings of their
unique worth and the tremendous responsibility it entails. Nor does it imply a divinization of the
earth which would prevent us from working on it and protecting it in its fragility. Such notions would
end up creating new imbalances which would deflect us from the reality which challenges us.[68]
At times we see an obsession with denying any pre-eminence to the human person; more zeal is
shown in protecting other species than in defending the dignity which all human beings share in

3.7 Page 27

▲back to top
27
equal measure. Certainly, we should be concerned lest other living beings be treated
irresponsibly. But we should be particularly indignant at the enormous inequalities in our midst,
whereby we continue to tolerate some considering themselves more worthy than others. We fail to
see that some are mired in desperate and degrading poverty, with no way out, while others have
not the faintest idea of what to do with their possessions, vainly showing off their supposed
superiority and leaving behind them so much waste which, if it were the case everywhere, would
destroy the planet. In practice, we continue to tolerate that some consider themselves more
human than others, as if they had been born with greater rights.
91. A sense of deep communion with the rest of nature cannot be real if our hearts lack
tenderness, compassion and concern for our fellow human beings. It is clearly inconsistent to
combat trafficking in endangered species while remaining completely indifferent to human
trafficking, unconcerned about the poor, or undertaking to destroy another human being deemed
unwanted. This compromises the very meaning of our struggle for the sake of the environment. It
is no coincidence that, in the canticle in which Saint Francis praises God for his creatures, he goes
on to say: “Praised be you my Lord, through those who give pardon for your love”. Everything is
connected. Concern for the environment thus needs to be joined to a sincere love for our fellow
human beings and an unwavering commitment to resolving the problems of society.
92. Moreover, when our hearts are authentically open to universal communion, this sense of
fraternity excludes nothing and no one. It follows that our indifference or cruelty towards fellow
creatures of this world sooner or later affects the treatment we mete out to other human beings.
We have only one heart, and the same wretchedness which leads us to mistreat an animal will not
be long in showing itself in our relationships with other people. Every act of cruelty towards any
creature is “contrary to human dignity”.[69] We can hardly consider ourselves to be fully loving if
we disregard any aspect of reality: “Peace, justice and the preservation of creation are three
absolutely interconnected themes, which cannot be separated and treated individually without
once again falling into reductionism”.[70] Everything is related, and we human beings are united
as brothers and sisters on a wonderful pilgrimage, woven together by the love God has for each of
his creatures and which also unites us in fond affection with brother sun, sister moon, brother river
and mother earth.
VI. THE COMMON DESTINATION OF GOODS
93. Whether believers or not, we are agreed today that the earth is essentially a shared
inheritance, whose fruits are meant to benefit everyone. For believers, this becomes a question of
fidelity to the Creator, since God created the world for everyone. Hence every ecological approach
needs to incorporate a social perspective which takes into account the fundamental rights of the
poor and the underprivileged. The principle of the subordination of private property to the universal
destination of goods, and thus the right of everyone to their use, is a golden rule of social conduct
and “the first principle of the whole ethical and social order”.[71] The Christian tradition has never

3.8 Page 28

▲back to top
28
recognized the right to private property as absolute or inviolable, and has stressed the social
purpose of all forms of private property. Saint John Paul II forcefully reaffirmed this teaching,
stating that “God gave the earth to the whole human race for the sustenance of all its members,
without excluding or favouring anyone”.[72] These are strong words. He noted that “a type of
development which did not respect and promote human rights – personal and social, economic
and political, including the rights of nations and of peoples – would not be really worthy of
man”.[73] He clearly explained that “the Church does indeed defend the legitimate right to private
property, but she also teaches no less clearly that there is always a social mortgage on all private
property, in order that goods may serve the general purpose that God gave them”.[74]
Consequently, he maintained, “it is not in accord with God’s plan that this gift be used in such a
way that its benefits favour only a few”.[75] This calls into serious question the unjust habits of a
part of humanity.[76]
94. The rich and the poor have equal dignity, for “the Lord is the maker of them all” (Prov 22:2).
“He himself made both small and great” (Wis 6:7), and “he makes his sun rise on the evil and on
the good” (Mt 5:45). This has practical consequences, such as those pointed out by the bishops of
Paraguay: “Every campesino has a natural right to possess a reasonable allotment of land where
he can establish his home, work for subsistence of his family and a secure life. This right must be
guaranteed so that its exercise is not illusory but real. That means that apart from the ownership of
property, rural people must have access to means of technical education, credit, insurance, and
markets”.[77]
95. The natural environment is a collective good, the patrimony of all humanity and the
responsibility of everyone. If we make something our own, it is only to administer it for the good of
all. If we do not, we burden our consciences with the weight of having denied the existence of
others. That is why the New Zealand bishops asked what the commandment “Thou shall not kill”
means when “twenty percent of the world’s population consumes resources at a rate that robs the
poor nations and future generations of what they need to survive”.[78]
VII. THE GAZE OF JESUS
96. Jesus took up the biblical faith in God the Creator, emphasizing a fundamental truth: God is
Father (cf. Mt 11:25). In talking with his disciples, Jesus would invite them to recognize the
paternal relationship God has with all his creatures. With moving tenderness he would remind
them that each one of them is important in God’s eyes: “Are not five sparrows sold for two
pennies? And not one of them is forgotten before God” (Lk 12:6). “Look at the birds of the air: they
neither sow nor reap nor gather into barns, and yet your heavenly Father feeds them” (Mt 6:26).
97. The Lord was able to invite others to be attentive to the beauty that there is in the world
because he himself was in constant touch with nature, lending it an attention full of fondness and
wonder. As he made his way throughout the land, he often stopped to contemplate the beauty

3.9 Page 29

▲back to top
29
sown by his Father, and invited his disciples to perceive a divine message in things: “Lift up your
eyes, and see how the fields are already white for harvest” (Jn 4:35). “The kingdom of God is like
a grain of mustard seed which a man took and sowed in his field; it is the smallest of all seeds, but
once it has grown, it is the greatest of plants” (Mt 13:31-32).
98. Jesus lived in full harmony with creation, and others were amazed: “What sort of man is this,
that even the winds and the sea obey him?” (Mt 8:27). His appearance was not that of an ascetic
set apart from the world, nor of an enemy to the pleasant things of life. Of himself he said: “The
Son of Man came eating and drinking and they say, ‘Look, a glutton and a drunkard!’” (Mt 11:19).
He was far removed from philosophies which despised the body, matter and the things of the
world. Such unhealthy dualisms, nonetheless, left a mark on certain Christian thinkers in the
course of history and disfigured the Gospel. Jesus worked with his hands, in daily contact with the
matter created by God, to which he gave form by his craftsmanship. It is striking that most of his
life was dedicated to this task in a simple life which awakened no admiration at all: “Is not this the
carpenter, the son of Mary?” (Mk 6:3). In this way he sanctified human labour and endowed it with
a special significance for our development. As Saint John Paul II taught, “by enduring the toil of
work in union with Christ crucified for us, man in a way collaborates with the Son of God for the
redemption of humanity”.[79]
99. In the Christian understanding of the world, the destiny of all creation is bound up with the
mystery of Christ, present from the beginning: “All things have been created though him and for
him” (Col 1:16).[80] The prologue of the Gospel of John (1:1-18) reveals Christ’s creative work as
the Divine Word (Logos). But then, unexpectedly, the prologue goes on to say that this same Word
“became flesh” (Jn 1:14). One Person of the Trinity entered into the created cosmos, throwing in
his lot with it, even to the cross. From the beginning of the world, but particularly through the
incarnation, the mystery of Christ is at work in a hidden manner in the natural world as a whole,
without thereby impinging on its autonomy.
100. The New Testament does not only tell us of the earthly Jesus and his tangible and loving
relationship with the world. It also shows him risen and glorious, present throughout creation by his
universal Lordship: “For in him all the fullness of God was pleased to dwell, and through him to
reconcile to himself all things, whether on earth or in heaven, making peace by the blood of his
cross” (Col 1:19-20). This leads us to direct our gaze to the end of time, when the Son will deliver
all things to the Father, so that “God may be everything to every one” (1 Cor 15:28). Thus, the
creatures of this world no longer appear to us under merely natural guise because the risen One is
mysteriously holding them to himself and directing them towards fullness as their end. The very
flowers of the field and the birds which his human eyes contemplated and admired are now
imbued with his radiant presence.
CHAPTER THREE

3.10 Page 30

▲back to top
30
THE HUMAN ROOTS OF THE ECOLOGICAL CRISIS
101. It would hardly be helpful to describe symptoms without acknowledging the human origins of
the ecological crisis. A certain way of understanding human life and activity has gone awry, to the
serious detriment of the world around us. Should we not pause and consider this? At this stage, I
propose that we focus on the dominant technocratic paradigm and the place of human beings and
of human action in the world.
I. TECHNOLOGY: CREATIVITY AND POWER
102. Humanity has entered a new era in which our technical prowess has brought us to a
crossroads. We are the beneficiaries of two centuries of enormous waves of change: steam
engines, railways, the telegraph, electricity, automobiles, aeroplanes, chemical industries, modern
medicine, information technology and, more recently, the digital revolution, robotics,
biotechnologies and nanotechnologies. It is right to rejoice in these advances and to be excited by
the immense possibilities which they continue to open up before us, for “science and technology
are wonderful products of a God-given human creativity”.[81] The modification of nature for useful
purposes has distinguished the human family from the beginning; technology itself “expresses the
inner tension that impels man gradually to overcome material limitations”.[82] Technology has
remedied countless evils which used to harm and limit human beings. How can we not feel
gratitude and appreciation for this progress, especially in the fields of medicine, engineering and
communications? How could we not acknowledge the work of many scientists and engineers who
have provided alternatives to make development sustainable?
103. Technoscience, when well directed, can produce important means of improving the quality of
human life, from useful domestic appliances to great transportation systems, bridges, buildings
and public spaces. It can also produce art and enable men and women immersed in the material
world to “leap” into the world of beauty. Who can deny the beauty of an aircraft or a skyscraper?
Valuable works of art and music now make use of new technologies. So, in the beauty intended by
the one who uses new technical instruments and in the contemplation of such beauty, a quantum
leap occurs, resulting in a fulfilment which is uniquely human.
104. Yet it must also be recognized that nuclear energy, biotechnology, information technology,
knowledge of our DNA, and many other abilities which we have acquired, have given us
tremendous power. More precisely, they have given those with the knowledge, and especially the
economic resources to use them, an impressive dominance over the whole of humanity and the
entire world. Never has humanity had such power over itself, yet nothing ensures that it will be
used wisely, particularly when we consider how it is currently being used. We need but think of the
nuclear bombs dropped in the middle of the twentieth century, or the array of technology which
Nazism, Communism and other totalitarian regimes have employed to kill millions of people, to say
nothing of the increasingly deadly arsenal of weapons available for modern warfare. In whose

4 Pages 31-40

▲back to top

4.1 Page 31

▲back to top
31
hands does all this power lie, or will it eventually end up? It is extremely risky for a small part of
humanity to have it.
105. There is a tendency to believe that every increase in power means “an increase of ‘progress’
itself”, an advance in “security, usefulness, welfare and vigour; …an assimilation of new values
into the stream of culture”,[83] as if reality, goodness and truth automatically flow from
technological and economic power as such. The fact is that “contemporary man has not been
trained to use power well”,[84] because our immense technological development has not been
accompanied by a development in human responsibility, values and conscience. Each age tends
to have only a meagre awareness of its own limitations. It is possible that we do not grasp the
gravity of the challenges now before us. “The risk is growing day by day that man will not use his
power as he should”; in effect, “power is never considered in terms of the responsibility of choice
which is inherent in freedom” since its “only norms are taken from alleged necessity, from either
utility or security”.[85] But human beings are not completely autonomous. Our freedom fades when
it is handed over to the blind forces of the unconscious, of immediate needs, of self-interest, and of
violence. In this sense, we stand naked and exposed in the face of our ever-increasing power,
lacking the wherewithal to control it. We have certain superficial mechanisms, but we cannot claim
to have a sound ethics, a culture and spirituality genuinely capable of setting limits and teaching
clear-minded self-restraint.
II. THE GLOBALIZATION OF THE TECHNOCRATIC PARADIGM
106. The basic problem goes even deeper: it is the way that humanity has taken up technology
and its development according to an undifferentiated and one-dimensional paradigm. This
paradigm exalts the concept of a subject who, using logical and rational procedures, progressively
approaches and gains control over an external object. This subject makes every effort to establish
the scientific and experimental method, which in itself is already a technique of possession,
mastery and transformation. It is as if the subject were to find itself in the presence of something
formless, completely open to manipulation. Men and women have constantly intervened in nature,
but for a long time this meant being in tune with and respecting the possibilities offered by the
things themselves. It was a matter of receiving what nature itself allowed, as if from its own hand.
Now, by contrast, we are the ones to lay our hands on things, attempting to extract everything
possible from them while frequently ignoring or forgetting the reality in front of us. Human beings
and material objects no longer extend a friendly hand to one another; the relationship has become
confrontational. This has made it easy to accept the idea of infinite or unlimited growth, which
proves so attractive to economists, financiers and experts in technology. It is based on the lie that
there is an infinite supply of the earth’s goods, and this leads to the planet being squeezed dry
beyond every limit. It is the false notion that “an infinite quantity of energy and resources are
available, that it is possible to renew them quickly, and that the negative effects of the exploitation
of the natural order can be easily absorbed”.[86]

4.2 Page 32

▲back to top
32
107. It can be said that many problems of today’s world stem from the tendency, at times
unconscious, to make the method and aims of science and technology an epistemological
paradigm which shapes the lives of individuals and the workings of society. The effects of
imposing this model on reality as a whole, human and social, are seen in the deterioration of the
environment, but this is just one sign of a reductionism which affects every aspect of human and
social life. We have to accept that technological products are not neutral, for they create a
framework which ends up conditioning lifestyles and shaping social possibilities along the lines
dictated by the interests of certain powerful groups. Decisions which may seem purely
instrumental are in reality decisions about the kind of society we want to build.
108. The idea of promoting a different cultural paradigm and employing technology as a mere
instrument is nowadays inconceivable. The technological paradigm has become so dominant that
it would be difficult to do without its resources and even more difficult to utilize them without being
dominated by their internal logic. It has become countercultural to choose a lifestyle whose goals
are even partly independent of technology, of its costs and its power to globalize and make us all
the same. Technology tends to absorb everything into its ironclad logic, and those who are
surrounded with technology “know full well that it moves forward in the final analysis neither for
profit nor for the well-being of the human race”, that “in the most radical sense of the term power is
its motive – a lordship over all”.[87] As a result, “man seizes hold of the naked elements of both
nature and human nature”.[88] Our capacity to make decisions, a more genuine freedom and the
space for each one’s alternative creativity are diminished.
109. The technocratic paradigm also tends to dominate economic and political life. The economy
accepts every advance in technology with a view to profit, without concern for its potentially
negative impact on human beings. Finance overwhelms the real economy. The lessons of the
global financial crisis have not been assimilated, and we are learning all too slowly the lessons of
environmental deterioration. Some circles maintain that current economics and technology will
solve all environmental problems, and argue, in popular and non-technical terms, that the
problems of global hunger and poverty will be resolved simply by market growth. They are less
concerned with certain economic theories which today scarcely anybody dares defend, than with
their actual operation in the functioning of the economy. They may not affirm such theories with
words, but nonetheless support them with their deeds by showing no interest in more balanced
levels of production, a better distribution of wealth, concern for the environment and the rights of
future generations. Their behaviour shows that for them maximizing profits is enough. Yet by itself
the market cannot guarantee integral human development and social inclusion.[89] At the same
time, we have “a sort of ‘superdevelopment’ of a wasteful and consumerist kind which forms an
unacceptable contrast with the ongoing situations of dehumanizing deprivation”,[90] while we are
all too slow in developing economic institutions and social initiatives which can give the poor
regular access to basic resources. We fail to see the deepest roots of our present failures, which
have to do with the direction, goals, meaning and social implications of technological and
economic growth.

4.3 Page 33

▲back to top
33
110. The specialization which belongs to technology makes it difficult to see the larger picture. The
fragmentation of knowledge proves helpful for concrete applications, and yet it often leads to a
loss of appreciation for the whole, for the relationships between things, and for the broader
horizon, which then becomes irrelevant. This very fact makes it hard to find adequate ways of
solving the more complex problems of today’s world, particularly those regarding the environment
and the poor; these problems cannot be dealt with from a single perspective or from a single set of
interests. A science which would offer solutions to the great issues would necessarily have to take
into account the data generated by other fields of knowledge, including philosophy and social
ethics; but this is a difficult habit to acquire today. Nor are there genuine ethical horizons to which
one can appeal. Life gradually becomes a surrender to situations conditioned by technology, itself
viewed as the principal key to the meaning of existence. In the concrete situation confronting us,
there are a number of symptoms which point to what is wrong, such as environmental
degradation, anxiety, a loss of the purpose of life and of community living. Once more we see that
“realities are more important than ideas”.[91]
111. Ecological culture cannot be reduced to a series of urgent and partial responses to the
immediate problems of pollution, environmental decay and the depletion of natural resources.
There needs to be a distinctive way of looking at things, a way of thinking, policies, an educational
programme, a lifestyle and a spirituality which together generate resistance to the assault of the
technocratic paradigm. Otherwise, even the best ecological initiatives can find themselves caught
up in the same globalized logic. To seek only a technical remedy to each environmental problem
which comes up is to separate what is in reality interconnected and to mask the true and deepest
problems of the global system.
112. Yet we can once more broaden our vision. We have the freedom needed to limit and direct
technology; we can put it at the service of another type of progress, one which is healthier, more
human, more social, more integral. Liberation from the dominant technocratic paradigm does in
fact happen sometimes, for example, when cooperatives of small producers adopt less polluting
means of production, and opt for a non-consumerist model of life, recreation and community. Or
when technology is directed primarily to resolving people’s concrete problems, truly helping them
live with more dignity and less suffering. Or indeed when the desire to create and contemplate
beauty manages to overcome reductionism through a kind of salvation which occurs in beauty and
in those who behold it. An authentic humanity, calling for a new synthesis, seems to dwell in the
midst of our technological culture, almost unnoticed, like a mist seeping gently beneath a closed
door. Will the promise last, in spite of everything, with all that is authentic rising up in stubborn
resistance?
113. There is also the fact that people no longer seem to believe in a happy future; they no longer
have blind trust in a better tomorrow based on the present state of the world and our technical
abilities. There is a growing awareness that scientific and technological progress cannot be
equated with the progress of humanity and history, a growing sense that the way to a better future

4.4 Page 34

▲back to top
34
lies elsewhere. This is not to reject the possibilities which technology continues to offer us. But
humanity has changed profoundly, and the accumulation of constant novelties exalts a
superficiality which pulls us in one direction. It becomes difficult to pause and recover depth in life.
If architecture reflects the spirit of an age, our megastructures and drab apartment blocks express
the spirit of globalized technology, where a constant flood of new products coexists with a tedious
monotony. Let us refuse to resign ourselves to this, and continue to wonder about the purpose and
meaning of everything. Otherwise we would simply legitimate the present situation and need new
forms of escapism to help us endure the emptiness.
114. All of this shows the urgent need for us to move forward in a bold cultural revolution. Science
and technology are not neutral; from the beginning to the end of a process, various intentions and
possibilities are in play and can take on distinct shapes. Nobody is suggesting a return to the
Stone Age, but we do need to slow down and look at reality in a different way, to appropriate the
positive and sustainable progress which has been made, but also to recover the values and the
great goals swept away by our unrestrained delusions of grandeur.
III. THE CRISIS AND EFFECTS OF MODERN ANTHROPOCENTRISM
115. Modern anthropocentrism has paradoxically ended up prizing technical thought over reality,
since “the technological mind sees nature as an insensate order, as a cold body of facts, as a
mere ‘given’, as an object of utility, as raw material to be hammered into useful shape; it views the
cosmos similarly as a mere ‘space’ into which objects can be thrown with complete
indifference”.[92] The intrinsic dignity of the world is thus compromised. When human beings fail to
find their true place in this world, they misunderstand themselves and end up acting against
themselves: “Not only has God given the earth to man, who must use it with respect for the
original good purpose for which it was given, but, man too is God’s gift to man. He must therefore
respect the natural and moral structure with which he has been endowed”.[93]
116. Modernity has been marked by an excessive anthropocentrism which today, under another
guise, continues to stand in the way of shared understanding and of any effort to strengthen social
bonds. The time has come to pay renewed attention to reality and the limits it imposes; this in turn
is the condition for a more sound and fruitful development of individuals and society. An
inadequate presentation of Christian anthropology gave rise to a wrong understanding of the
relationship between human beings and the world. Often, what was handed on was a Promethean
vision of mastery over the world, which gave the impression that the protection of nature was
something that only the faint-hearted cared about. Instead, our “dominion” over the universe
should be understood more properly in the sense of responsible stewardship.[94]
117. Neglecting to monitor the harm done to nature and the environmental impact of our decisions
is only the most striking sign of a disregard for the message contained in the structures of nature
itself. When we fail to acknowledge as part of reality the worth of a poor person, a human embryo,

4.5 Page 35

▲back to top
35
a person with disabilities – to offer just a few examples – it becomes difficult to hear the cry of
nature itself; everything is connected. Once the human being declares independence from reality
and behaves with absolute dominion, the very foundations of our life begin to crumble, for “instead
of carrying out his role as a cooperator with God in the work of creation, man sets himself up in
place of God and thus ends up provoking a rebellion on the part of nature”.[95]
118. This situation has led to a constant schizophrenia, wherein a technocracy which sees no
intrinsic value in lesser beings coexists with the other extreme, which sees no special value in
human beings. But one cannot prescind from humanity. There can be no renewal of our
relationship with nature without a renewal of humanity itself. There can be no ecology without an
adequate anthropology. When the human person is considered as simply one being among
others, the product of chance or physical determinism, then “our overall sense of responsibility
wanes”.[96] A misguided anthropocentrism need not necessarily yield to “biocentrism”, for that
would entail adding yet another imbalance, failing to solve present problems and adding new
ones. Human beings cannot be expected to feel responsibility for the world unless, at the same
time, their unique capacities of knowledge, will, freedom and responsibility are recognized and
valued.
119. Nor must the critique of a misguided anthropocentrism underestimate the importance of
interpersonal relations. If the present ecological crisis is one small sign of the ethical, cultural and
spiritual crisis of modernity, we cannot presume to heal our relationship with nature and the
environment without healing all fundamental human relationships. Christian thought sees human
beings as possessing a particular dignity above other creatures; it thus inculcates esteem for each
person and respect for others. Our openness to others, each of whom is a “thou” capable of
knowing, loving and entering into dialogue, remains the source of our nobility as human persons.
A correct relationship with the created world demands that we not weaken this social dimension of
openness to others, much less the transcendent dimension of our openness to the “Thou” of God.
Our relationship with the environment can never be isolated from our relationship with others and
with God. Otherwise, it would be nothing more than romantic individualism dressed up in
ecological garb, locking us into a stifling immanence.
120. Since everything is interrelated, concern for the protection of nature is also incompatible with
the justification of abortion. How can we genuinely teach the importance of concern for other
vulnerable beings, however troublesome or inconvenient they may be, if we fail to protect a human
embryo, even when its presence is uncomfortable and creates difficulties? “If personal and social
sensitivity towards the acceptance of the new life is lost, then other forms of acceptance that are
valuable for society also wither away”.[97]
121. We need to develop a new synthesis capable of overcoming the false arguments of recent
centuries. Christianity, in fidelity to its own identity and the rich deposit of truth which it has
received from Jesus Christ, continues to reflect on these issues in fruitful dialogue with changing

4.6 Page 36

▲back to top
36
historical situations. In doing so, it reveals its eternal newness.[98]
Practical relativism
122. A misguided anthropocentrism leads to a misguided lifestyle. In the Apostolic Exhortation
Evangelii Gaudium, I noted that the practical relativism typical of our age is “even more dangerous
than doctrinal relativism”.[99] When human beings place themselves at the centre, they give
absolute priority to immediate convenience and all else becomes relative. Hence we should not be
surprised to find, in conjunction with the omnipresent technocratic paradigm and the cult of
unlimited human power, the rise of a relativism which sees everything as irrelevant unless it
serves one’s own immediate interests. There is a logic in all this whereby different attitudes can
feed on one another, leading to environmental degradation and social decay.
123. The culture of relativism is the same disorder which drives one person to take advantage of
another, to treat others as mere objects, imposing forced labour on them or enslaving them to pay
their debts. The same kind of thinking leads to the sexual exploitation of children and
abandonment of the elderly who no longer serve our interests. It is also the mindset of those who
say: Let us allow the invisible forces of the market to regulate the economy, and consider their
impact on society and nature as collateral damage. In the absence of objective truths or sound
principles other than the satisfaction of our own desires and immediate needs, what limits can be
placed on human trafficking, organized crime, the drug trade, commerce in blood diamonds and
the fur of endangered species? Is it not the same relativistic logic which justifies buying the organs
of the poor for resale or use in experimentation, or eliminating children because they are not what
their parents wanted? This same “use and throw away” logic generates so much waste, because
of the disordered desire to consume more than what is really necessary. We should not think that
political efforts or the force of law will be sufficient to prevent actions which affect the environment
because, when the culture itself is corrupt and objective truth and universally valid principles are
no longer upheld, then laws can only be seen as arbitrary impositions or obstacles to be avoided.
The need to protect employment
124. Any approach to an integral ecology, which by definition does not exclude human beings,
needs to take account of the value of labour, as Saint John Paul II wisely noted in his Encyclical
Laborem Exercens. According to the biblical account of creation, God placed man and woman in
the garden he had created (cf. Gen 2:15) not only to preserve it (“keep”) but also to make it fruitful
(“till”). Labourers and craftsmen thus “maintain the fabric of the world” (Sir 38:34). Developing the
created world in a prudent way is the best way of caring for it, as this means that we ourselves
become the instrument used by God to bring out the potential which he himself inscribed in things:
“The Lord created medicines out of the earth, and a sensible man will not despise them” (Sir 38:4).
125. If we reflect on the proper relationship between human beings and the world around us, we

4.7 Page 37

▲back to top
37
see the need for a correct understanding of work; if we talk about the relationship between human
beings and things, the question arises as to the meaning and purpose of all human activity. This
has to do not only with manual or agricultural labour but with any activity involving a modification of
existing reality, from producing a social report to the design of a technological development.
Underlying every form of work is a concept of the relationship which we can and must have with
what is other than ourselves. Together with the awe-filled contemplation of creation which we find
in Saint Francis of Assisi, the Christian spiritual tradition has also developed a rich and balanced
understanding of the meaning of work, as, for example, in the life of Blessed Charles de Foucauld
and his followers.
126. We can also look to the great tradition of monasticism. Originally, it was a kind of flight from
the world, an escape from the decadence of the cities. The monks sought the desert, convinced
that it was the best place for encountering the presence of God. Later, Saint Benedict of Norcia
proposed that his monks live in community, combining prayer and spiritual reading with manual
labour (ora et labora). Seeing manual labour as spiritually meaningful proved revolutionary.
Personal growth and sanctification came to be sought in the interplay of recollection and work.
This way of experiencing work makes us more protective and respectful of the environment; it
imbues our relationship to the world with a healthy sobriety.
127. We are convinced that “man is the source, the focus and the aim of all economic and social
life”.[100] Nonetheless, once our human capacity for contemplation and reverence is impaired, it
becomes easy for the meaning of work to be misunderstood.[101] We need to remember that men
and women have “the capacity to improve their lot, to further their moral growth and to develop
their spiritual endowments”.[102] Work should be the setting for this rich personal growth, where
many aspects of life enter into play: creativity, planning for the future, developing our talents, living
out our values, relating to others, giving glory to God. It follows that, in the reality of today’s global
society, it is essential that “we continue to prioritize the goal of access to steady employment for
everyone”,[103] no matter the limited interests of business and dubious economic reasoning.
128. We were created with a vocation to work. The goal should not be that technological progress
increasingly replace human work, for this would be detrimental to humanity. Work is a necessity,
part of the meaning of life on this earth, a path to growth, human development and personal
fulfilment. Helping the poor financially must always be a provisional solution in the face of pressing
needs. The broader objective should always be to allow them a dignified life through work. Yet the
orientation of the economy has favoured a kind of technological progress in which the costs of
production are reduced by laying off workers and replacing them with machines. This is yet
another way in which we can end up working against ourselves. The loss of jobs also has a
negative impact on the economy “through the progressive erosion of social capital: the network of
relationships of trust, dependability, and respect for rules, all of which are indispensable for any
form of civil coexistence”.[104] In other words, “human costs always include economic costs, and
economic dysfunctions always involve human costs”.[105] To stop investing in people, in order to

4.8 Page 38

▲back to top
38
gain greater short-term financial gain, is bad business for society.
129. In order to continue providing employment, it is imperative to promote an economy which
favours productive diversity and business creativity. For example, there is a great variety of small-
scale food production systems which feed the greater part of the world’s peoples, using a modest
amount of land and producing less waste, be it in small agricultural parcels, in orchards and
gardens, hunting and wild harvesting or local fishing. Economies of scale, especially in the
agricultural sector, end up forcing smallholders to sell their land or to abandon their traditional
crops. Their attempts to move to other, more diversified, means of production prove fruitless
because of the difficulty of linkage with regional and global markets, or because the infrastructure
for sales and transport is geared to larger businesses. Civil authorities have the right and duty to
adopt clear and firm measures in support of small producers and differentiated production. To
ensure economic freedom from which all can effectively benefit, restraints occasionally have to be
imposed on those possessing greater resources and financial power. To claim economic freedom
while real conditions bar many people from actual access to it, and while possibilities for
employment continue to shrink, is to practise a doublespeak which brings politics into disrepute.
Business is a noble vocation, directed to producing wealth and improving our world. It can be a
fruitful source of prosperity for the areas in which it operates, especially if it sees the creation of
jobs as an essential part of its service to the common good.
New biological technologies
130. In the philosophical and theological vision of the human being and of creation which I have
presented, it is clear that the human person, endowed with reason and knowledge, is not an
external factor to be excluded. While human intervention on plants and animals is permissible
when it pertains to the necessities of human life, the Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches
that experimentation on animals is morally acceptable only “if it remains within reasonable limits
[and] contributes to caring for or saving human lives”.[106] The Catechism firmly states that
human power has limits and that “it is contrary to human dignity to cause animals to suffer or die
needlessly”.[107] All such use and experimentation “requires a religious respect for the integrity of
creation”.[108]
131. Here I would recall the balanced position of Saint John Paul II, who stressed the benefits of
scientific and technological progress as evidence of “the nobility of the human vocation to
participate responsibly in God’s creative action”, while also noting that “we cannot interfere in one
area of the ecosystem without paying due attention to the consequences of such interference in
other areas”.[109] He made it clear that the Church values the benefits which result “from the
study and applications of molecular biology, supplemented by other disciplines such as genetics,
and its technological application in agriculture and industry”.[110] But he also pointed out that this
should not lead to “indiscriminate genetic manipulation”[111] which ignores the negative effects of
such interventions. Human creativity cannot be suppressed. If an artist cannot be stopped from

4.9 Page 39

▲back to top
39
using his or her creativity, neither should those who possess particular gifts for the advancement
of science and technology be prevented from using their God-given talents for the service of
others. We need constantly to rethink the goals, effects, overall context and ethical limits of this
human activity, which is a form of power involving considerable risks.
132. This, then, is the correct framework for any reflection concerning human intervention on
plants and animals, which at present includes genetic manipulation by biotechnology for the sake
of exploiting the potential present in material reality. The respect owed by faith to reason calls for
close attention to what the biological sciences, through research uninfluenced by economic
interests, can teach us about biological structures, their possibilities and their mutations. Any
legitimate intervention will act on nature only in order “to favour its development in its own line, that
of creation, as intended by God”.[112]
133. It is difficult to make a general judgement about genetic modification (GM), whether vegetable
or animal, medical or agricultural, since these vary greatly among themselves and call for specific
considerations. The risks involved are not always due to the techniques used, but rather to their
improper or excessive application. Genetic mutations, in fact, have often been, and continue to be,
caused by nature itself. Nor are mutations caused by human intervention a modern phenomenon.
The domestication of animals, the crossbreeding of species and other older and universally
accepted practices can be mentioned as examples. We need but recall that scientific
developments in GM cereals began with the observation of natural bacteria which spontaneously
modified plant genomes. In nature, however, this process is slow and cannot be compared to the
fast pace induced by contemporary technological advances, even when the latter build upon
several centuries of scientific progress.
134. Although no conclusive proof exists that GM cereals may be harmful to human beings, and in
some regions their use has brought about economic growth which has helped to resolve problems,
there remain a number of significant difficulties which should not be underestimated. In many
places, following the introduction of these crops, productive land is concentrated in the hands of a
few owners due to “the progressive disappearance of small producers, who, as a consequence of
the loss of the exploited lands, are obliged to withdraw from direct production”.[113] The most
vulnerable of these become temporary labourers, and many rural workers end up moving to
poverty-stricken urban areas. The expansion of these crops has the effect of destroying the
complex network of ecosystems, diminishing the diversity of production and affecting regional
economies, now and in the future. In various countries, we see an expansion of oligopolies for the
production of cereals and other products needed for their cultivation. This dependency would be
aggravated were the production of infertile seeds to be considered; the effect would be to force
farmers to purchase them from larger producers.
135. Certainly, these issues require constant attention and a concern for their ethical implications.
A broad, responsible scientific and social debate needs to take place, one capable of considering

4.10 Page 40

▲back to top
40
all the available information and of calling things by their name. It sometimes happens that
complete information is not put on the table; a selection is made on the basis of particular
interests, be they politico-economic or ideological. This makes it difficult to reach a balanced and
prudent judgement on different questions, one which takes into account all the pertinent variables.
Discussions are needed in which all those directly or indirectly affected (farmers, consumers, civil
authorities, scientists, seed producers, people living near fumigated fields, and others) can make
known their problems and concerns, and have access to adequate and reliable information in
order to make decisions for the common good, present and future. This is a complex
environmental issue; it calls for a comprehensive approach which would require, at the very least,
greater efforts to finance various lines of independent, interdisciplinary research capable of
shedding new light on the problem.
136. On the other hand, it is troubling that, when some ecological movements defend the integrity
of the environment, rightly demanding that certain limits be imposed on scientific research, they
sometimes fail to apply those same principles to human life. There is a tendency to justify
transgressing all boundaries when experimentation is carried out on living human embryos. We
forget that the inalienable worth of a human being transcends his or her degree of development. In
the same way, when technology disregards the great ethical principles, it ends up considering any
practice whatsoever as licit. As we have seen in this chapter, a technology severed from ethics will
not easily be able to limit its own power.
CHAPTER FOUR
INTEGRAL ECOLOGY
137. Since everything is closely interrelated, and today’s problems call for a vision capable of
taking into account every aspect of the global crisis, I suggest that we now consider some
elements of an integral ecology, one which clearly respects its human and social dimensions.
I. ENVIRONMENTAL, ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL ECOLOGY
138. Ecology studies the relationship between living organisms and the environment in which they
develop. This necessarily entails reflection and debate about the conditions required for the life
and survival of society, and the honesty needed to question certain models of development,
production and consumption. It cannot be emphasized enough how everything is interconnected.
Time and space are not independent of one another, and not even atoms or subatomic particles
can be considered in isolation. Just as the different aspects of the planet – physical, chemical and
biological – are interrelated, so too living species are part of a network which we will never fully
explore and understand. A good part of our genetic code is shared by many living beings. It
follows that the fragmentation of knowledge and the isolation of bits of information can actually
become a form of ignorance, unless they are integrated into a broader vision of reality.

5 Pages 41-50

▲back to top

5.1 Page 41

▲back to top
41
139. When we speak of the “environment”, what we really mean is a relationship existing between
nature and the society which lives in it. Nature cannot be regarded as something separate from
ourselves or as a mere setting in which we live. We are part of nature, included in it and thus in
constant interaction with it. Recognizing the reasons why a given area is polluted requires a study
of the workings of society, its economy, its behaviour patterns, and the ways it grasps reality.
Given the scale of change, it is no longer possible to find a specific, discrete answer for each part
of the problem. It is essential to seek comprehensive solutions which consider the interactions
within natural systems themselves and with social systems. We are faced not with two separate
crises, one environmental and the other social, but rather with one complex crisis which is both
social and environmental. Strategies for a solution demand an integrated approach to combating
poverty, restoring dignity to the excluded, and at the same time protecting nature.
140. Due to the number and variety of factors to be taken into account when determining the
environmental impact of a concrete undertaking, it is essential to give researchers their due role,
to facilitate their interaction, and to ensure broad academic freedom. Ongoing research should
also give us a better understanding of how different creatures relate to one another in making up
the larger units which today we term “ecosystems”. We take these systems into account not only
to determine how best to use them, but also because they have an intrinsic value independent of
their usefulness. Each organism, as a creature of God, is good and admirable in itself; the same is
true of the harmonious ensemble of organisms existing in a defined space and functioning as a
system. Although we are often not aware of it, we depend on these larger systems for our own
existence. We need only recall how ecosystems interact in dispersing carbon dioxide, purifying
water, controlling illnesses and epidemics, forming soil, breaking down waste, and in many other
ways which we overlook or simply do not know about. Once they become conscious of this, many
people realize that we live and act on the basis of a reality which has previously been given to us,
which precedes our existence and our abilities. So, when we speak of “sustainable use”,
consideration must always be given to each ecosystem’s regenerative ability in its different areas
and aspects.
141. Economic growth, for its part, tends to produce predictable reactions and a certain
standardization with the aim of simplifying procedures and reducing costs. This suggests the need
for an “economic ecology” capable of appealing to a broader vision of reality. The protection of the
environment is in fact “an integral part of the development process and cannot be considered in
isolation from it”.[114] We urgently need a humanism capable of bringing together the different
fields of knowledge, including economics, in the service of a more integral and integrating vision.
Today, the analysis of environmental problems cannot be separated from the analysis of human,
family, work-related and urban contexts, nor from how individuals relate to themselves, which
leads in turn to how they relate to others and to the environment. There is an interrelation between
ecosystems and between the various spheres of social interaction, demonstrating yet again that
“the whole is greater than the part”.[115]

5.2 Page 42

▲back to top
42
142. If everything is related, then the health of a society’s institutions has consequences for the
environment and the quality of human life. “Every violation of solidarity and civic friendship harms
the environment”.[116] In this sense, social ecology is necessarily institutional, and gradually
extends to the whole of society, from the primary social group, the family, to the wider local,
national and international communities. Within each social stratum, and between them, institutions
develop to regulate human relationships. Anything which weakens those institutions has negative
consequences, such as injustice, violence and loss of freedom. A number of countries have a
relatively low level of institutional effectiveness, which results in greater problems for their people
while benefiting those who profit from this situation. Whether in the administration of the state, the
various levels of civil society, or relationships between individuals themselves, lack of respect for
the law is becoming more common. Laws may be well framed yet remain a dead letter. Can we
hope, then, that in such cases, legislation and regulations dealing with the environment will really
prove effective? We know, for example, that countries which have clear legislation about the
protection of forests continue to keep silent as they watch laws repeatedly being broken.
Moreover, what takes place in any one area can have a direct or indirect influence on other areas.
Thus, for example, drug use in affluent societies creates a continual and growing demand for
products imported from poorer regions, where behaviour is corrupted, lives are destroyed, and the
environment continues to deteriorate.
II. CULTURAL ECOLOGY
143. Together with the patrimony of nature, there is also an historic, artistic and cultural patrimony
which is likewise under threat. This patrimony is a part of the shared identity of each place and a
foundation upon which to build a habitable city. It is not a matter of tearing down and building new
cities, supposedly more respectful of the environment yet not always more attractive to live in.
Rather, there is a need to incorporate the history, culture and architecture of each place, thus
preserving its original identity. Ecology, then, also involves protecting the cultural treasures of
humanity in the broadest sense. More specifically, it calls for greater attention to local cultures
when studying environmental problems, favouring a dialogue between scientific-technical
language and the language of the people. Culture is more than what we have inherited from the
past; it is also, and above all, a living, dynamic and participatory present reality, which cannot be
excluded as we rethink the relationship between human beings and the environment.
144. A consumerist vision of human beings, encouraged by the mechanisms of today’s globalized
economy, has a levelling effect on cultures, diminishing the immense variety which is the heritage
of all humanity. Attempts to resolve all problems through uniform regulations or technical
interventions can lead to overlooking the complexities of local problems which demand the active
participation of all members of the community. New processes taking shape cannot always fit into
frameworks imported from outside; they need to be based in the local culture itself. As life and the
world are dynamic realities, so our care for the world must also be flexible and dynamic. Merely
technical solutions run the risk of addressing symptoms and not the more serious underlying

5.3 Page 43

▲back to top
43
problems. There is a need to respect the rights of peoples and cultures, and to appreciate that the
development of a social group presupposes an historical process which takes place within a
cultural context and demands the constant and active involvement of local people from within their
proper culture. Nor can the notion of the quality of life be imposed from without, for quality of life
must be understood within the world of symbols and customs proper to each human group.
145. Many intensive forms of environmental exploitation and degradation not only exhaust the
resources which provide local communities with their livelihood, but also undo the social structures
which, for a long time, shaped cultural identity and their sense of the meaning of life and
community. The disappearance of a culture can be just as serious, or even more serious, than the
disappearance of a species of plant or animal. The imposition of a dominant lifestyle linked to a
single form of production can be just as harmful as the altering of ecosystems.
146. In this sense, it is essential to show special care for indigenous communities and their cultural
traditions. They are not merely one minority among others, but should be the principal dialogue
partners, especially when large projects affecting their land are proposed. For them, land is not a
commodity but rather a gift from God and from their ancestors who rest there, a sacred space with
which they need to interact if they are to maintain their identity and values. When they remain on
their land, they themselves care for it best. Nevertheless, in various parts of the world, pressure is
being put on them to abandon their homelands to make room for agricultural or mining projects
which are undertaken without regard for the degradation of nature and culture.
III. ECOLOGY OF DAILY LIFE
147. Authentic development includes efforts to bring about an integral improvement in the quality
of human life, and this entails considering the setting in which people live their lives. These
settings influence the way we think, feel and act. In our rooms, our homes, our workplaces and
neighbourhoods, we use our environment as a way of expressing our identity. We make every
effort to adapt to our environment, but when it is disorderly, chaotic or saturated with noise and
ugliness, such overstimulation makes it difficult to find ourselves integrated and happy.
148. An admirable creativity and generosity is shown by persons and groups who respond to
environmental limitations by alleviating the adverse effects of their surroundings and learning to
orient their lives amid disorder and uncertainty. For example, in some places, where the façades
of buildings are derelict, people show great care for the interior of their homes, or find contentment
in the kindness and friendliness of others. A wholesome social life can light up a seemingly
undesirable environment. At times a commendable human ecology is practised by the poor
despite numerous hardships. The feeling of asphyxiation brought on by densely populated
residential areas is countered if close and warm relationships develop, if communities are created,
if the limitations of the environment are compensated for in the interior of each person who feels
held within a network of solidarity and belonging. In this way, any place can turn from being a hell

5.4 Page 44

▲back to top
44
on earth into the setting for a dignified life.
149. The extreme poverty experienced in areas lacking harmony, open spaces or potential for
integration, can lead to incidents of brutality and to exploitation by criminal organizations. In the
unstable neighbourhoods of mega-cities, the daily experience of overcrowding and social
anonymity can create a sense of uprootedness which spawns antisocial behaviour and violence.
Nonetheless, I wish to insist that love always proves more powerful. Many people in these
conditions are able to weave bonds of belonging and togetherness which convert overcrowding
into an experience of community in which the walls of the ego are torn down and the barriers of
selfishness overcome. This experience of a communitarian salvation often generates creative
ideas for the improvement of a building or a neighbourhood.[117]
150. Given the interrelationship between living space and human behaviour, those who design
buildings, neighbourhoods, public spaces and cities, ought to draw on the various disciplines
which help us to understand people’s thought processes, symbolic language and ways of acting. It
is not enough to seek the beauty of design. More precious still is the service we offer to another
kind of beauty: people’s quality of life, their adaptation to the environment, encounter and mutual
assistance. Here too, we see how important it is that urban planning always take into
consideration the views of those who will live in these areas.
151. There is also a need to protect those common areas, visual landmarks and urban landscapes
which increase our sense of belonging, of rootedness, of “feeling at home” within a city which
includes us and brings us together. It is important that the different parts of a city be well
integrated and that those who live there have a sense of the whole, rather than being confined to
one neighbourhood and failing to see the larger city as space which they share with others.
Interventions which affect the urban or rural landscape should take into account how various
elements combine to form a whole which is perceived by its inhabitants as a coherent and
meaningful framework for their lives. Others will then no longer be seen as strangers, but as part
of a “we” which all of us are working to create. For this same reason, in both urban and rural
settings, it is helpful to set aside some places which can be preserved and protected from constant
changes brought by human intervention.
152. Lack of housing is a grave problem in many parts of the world, both in rural areas and in large
cities, since state budgets usually cover only a small portion of the demand. Not only the poor, but
many other members of society as well, find it difficult to own a home. Having a home has much to
do with a sense of personal dignity and the growth of families. This is a major issue for human
ecology. In some places, where makeshift shanty towns have sprung up, this will mean developing
those neighbourhoods rather than razing or displacing them. When the poor live in unsanitary
slums or in dangerous tenements, “in cases where it is necessary to relocate them, in order not to
heap suffering upon suffering, adequate information needs to be given beforehand, with choices of
decent housing offered, and the people directly involved must be part of the process”.[118] At the

5.5 Page 45

▲back to top
45
same time, creativity should be shown in integrating rundown neighbourhoods into a welcoming
city: “How beautiful those cities which overcome paralyzing mistrust, integrate those who are
different and make this very integration a new factor of development! How attractive are those
cities which, even in their architectural design, are full of spaces which connect, relate and favour
the recognition of others!”[119]
153. The quality of life in cities has much to do with systems of transport, which are often a source
of much suffering for those who use them. Many cars, used by one or more people, circulate in
cities, causing traffic congestion, raising the level of pollution, and consuming enormous quantities
of non-renewable energy. This makes it necessary to build more roads and parking areas which
spoil the urban landscape. Many specialists agree on the need to give priority to public
transportation. Yet some measures needed will not prove easily acceptable to society unless
substantial improvements are made in the systems themselves, which in many cities force people
to put up with undignified conditions due to crowding, inconvenience, infrequent service and lack
of safety.
154. Respect for our dignity as human beings often jars with the chaotic realities that people have
to endure in city life. Yet this should not make us overlook the abandonment and neglect also
experienced by some rural populations which lack access to essential services and where some
workers are reduced to conditions of servitude, without rights or even the hope of a more dignified
life.
155. Human ecology also implies another profound reality: the relationship between human life
and the moral law, which is inscribed in our nature and is necessary for the creation of a more
dignified environment. Pope Benedict XVI spoke of an “ecology of man”, based on the fact that
“man too has a nature that he must respect and that he cannot manipulate at will”.[120] It is
enough to recognize that our body itself establishes us in a direct relationship with the
environment and with other living beings. The acceptance of our bodies as God’s gift is vital for
welcoming and accepting the entire world as a gift from the Father and our common home,
whereas thinking that we enjoy absolute power over our own bodies turns, often subtly, into
thinking that we enjoy absolute power over creation. Learning to accept our body, to care for it and
to respect its fullest meaning, is an essential element of any genuine human ecology. Also, valuing
one’s own body in its femininity or masculinity is necessary if I am going to be able to recognize
myself in an encounter with someone who is different. In this way we can joyfully accept the
specific gifts of another man or woman, the work of God the Creator, and find mutual enrichment.
It is not a healthy attitude which would seek “to cancel out sexual difference because it no longer
knows how to confront it”.[121]
IV. THE PRINCIPLE OF THE COMMON GOOD
156. An integral ecology is inseparable from the notion of the common good, a central and unifying

5.6 Page 46

▲back to top
46
principle of social ethics. The common good is “the sum of those conditions of social life which
allow social groups and their individual members relatively thorough and ready access to their own
fulfilment”.[122]
157. Underlying the principle of the common good is respect for the human person as such,
endowed with basic and inalienable rights ordered to his or her integral development. It has also to
do with the overall welfare of society and the development of a variety of intermediate groups,
applying the principle of subsidiarity. Outstanding among those groups is the family, as the basic
cell of society. Finally, the common good calls for social peace, the stability and security provided
by a certain order which cannot be achieved without particular concern for distributive justice;
whenever this is violated, violence always ensues. Society as a whole, and the state in particular,
are obliged to defend and promote the common good.
158. In the present condition of global society, where injustices abound and growing numbers of
people are deprived of basic human rights and considered expendable, the principle of the
common good immediately becomes, logically and inevitably, a summons to solidarity and a
preferential option for the poorest of our brothers and sisters. This option entails recognizing the
implications of the universal destination of the world’s goods, but, as I mentioned in the Apostolic
Exhortation Evangelii Gaudium,[123] it demands before all else an appreciation of the immense
dignity of the poor in the light of our deepest convictions as believers. We need only look around
us to see that, today, this option is in fact an ethical imperative essential for effectively attaining
the common good.
V. JUSTICE BETWEEN THE GENERATIONS
159. The notion of the common good also extends to future generations. The global economic
crises have made painfully obvious the detrimental effects of disregarding our common destiny,
which cannot exclude those who come after us. We can no longer speak of sustainable
development apart from intergenerational solidarity. Once we start to think about the kind of world
we are leaving to future generations, we look at things differently; we realize that the world is a gift
which we have freely received and must share with others. Since the world has been given to us,
we can no longer view reality in a purely utilitarian way, in which efficiency and productivity are
entirely geared to our individual benefit. Intergenerational solidarity is not optional, but rather a
basic question of justice, since the world we have received also belongs to those who will follow
us. The Portuguese bishops have called upon us to acknowledge this obligation of justice: “The
environment is part of a logic of receptivity. It is on loan to each generation, which must then hand
it on to the next”.[124] An integral ecology is marked by this broader vision.
160. What kind of world do we want to leave to those who come after us, to children who are now
growing up? This question not only concerns the environment in isolation; the issue cannot be
approached piecemeal. When we ask ourselves what kind of world we want to leave behind, we

5.7 Page 47

▲back to top
47
think in the first place of its general direction, its meaning and its values. Unless we struggle with
these deeper issues, I do not believe that our concern for ecology will produce significant results.
But if these issues are courageously faced, we are led inexorably to ask other pointed questions:
What is the purpose of our life in this world? Why are we here? What is the goal of our work and
all our efforts? What need does the earth have of us? It is no longer enough, then, simply to state
that we should be concerned for future generations. We need to see that what is at stake is our
own dignity. Leaving an inhabitable planet to future generations is, first and foremost, up to us.
The issue is one which dramatically affects us, for it has to do with the ultimate meaning of our
earthly sojourn.
161. Doomsday predictions can no longer be met with irony or disdain. We may well be leaving to
coming generations debris, desolation and filth. The pace of consumption, waste and
environmental change has so stretched the planet’s capacity that our contemporary lifestyle,
unsustainable as it is, can only precipitate catastrophes, such as those which even now
periodically occur in different areas of the world. The effects of the present imbalance can only be
reduced by our decisive action, here and now. We need to reflect on our accountability before
those who will have to endure the dire consequences.
162. Our difficulty in taking up this challenge seriously has much to do with an ethical and cultural
decline which has accompanied the deterioration of the environment. Men and women of our
postmodern world run the risk of rampant individualism, and many problems of society are
connected with today’s self-centred culture of instant gratification. We see this in the crisis of
family and social ties and the difficulties of recognizing the other. Parents can be prone to
impulsive and wasteful consumption, which then affects their children who find it increasingly
difficult to acquire a home of their own and build a family. Furthermore, our inability to think
seriously about future generations is linked to our inability to broaden the scope of our present
interests and to give consideration to those who remain excluded from development. Let us not
only keep the poor of the future in mind, but also today’s poor, whose life on this earth is brief and
who cannot keep on waiting. Hence, “in addition to a fairer sense of intergenerational solidarity
there is also an urgent moral need for a renewed sense of intragenerational solidarity”.[125]
CHAPTER FIVE
LINES OF APPROACH AND ACTION
163. So far I have attempted to take stock of our present situation, pointing to the cracks in the
planet that we inhabit as well as to the profoundly human causes of environmental degradation.
Although the contemplation of this reality in itself has already shown the need for a change of
direction and other courses of action, now we shall try to outline the major paths of dialogue which
can help us escape the spiral of self-destruction which currently engulfs us.

5.8 Page 48

▲back to top
48
I. DIALOGUE ON THE ENVIRONMENT IN THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY
164. Beginning in the middle of the last century and overcoming many difficulties, there has been
a growing conviction that our planet is a homeland and that humanity is one people living in a
common home. An interdependent world not only makes us more conscious of the negative
effects of certain lifestyles and models of production and consumption which affect us all; more
importantly, it motivates us to ensure that solutions are proposed from a global perspective, and
not simply to defend the interests of a few countries. Interdependence obliges us to think of one
world with a common plan. Yet the same ingenuity which has brought about enormous
technological progress has so far proved incapable of finding effective ways of dealing with grave
environmental and social problems worldwide. A global consensus is essential for confronting the
deeper problems, which cannot be resolved by unilateral actions on the part of individual
countries. Such a consensus could lead, for example, to planning a sustainable and diversified
agriculture, developing renewable and less polluting forms of energy, encouraging a more efficient
use of energy, promoting a better management of marine and forest resources, and ensuring
universal access to drinking water.
165. We know that technology based on the use of highly polluting fossil fuels – especially coal,
but also oil and, to a lesser degree, gas – needs to be progressively replaced without delay. Until
greater progress is made in developing widely accessible sources of renewable energy, it is
legitimate to choose the less harmful alternative or to find short-term solutions. But the
international community has still not reached adequate agreements about the responsibility for
paying the costs of this energy transition. In recent decades, environmental issues have given rise
to considerable public debate and have elicited a variety of committed and generous civic
responses. Politics and business have been slow to react in a way commensurate with the
urgency of the challenges facing our world. Although the post-industrial period may well be
remembered as one of the most irresponsible in history, nonetheless there is reason to hope that
humanity at the dawn of the twenty-first century will be remembered for having generously
shouldered its grave responsibilities.
166. Worldwide, the ecological movement has made significant advances, thanks also to the
efforts of many organizations of civil society. It is impossible here to mention them all, or to review
the history of their contributions. But thanks to their efforts, environmental questions have
increasingly found a place on public agendas and encouraged more far-sighted approaches. This
notwithstanding, recent World Summits on the environment have not lived up to expectations
because, due to lack of political will, they were unable to reach truly meaningful and effective
global agreements on the environment.
167. The 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro is worth mentioning. It proclaimed that “human
beings are at the centre of concerns for sustainable development”.[126] Echoing the 1972
Stockholm Declaration, it enshrined international cooperation to care for the ecosystem of the

5.9 Page 49

▲back to top
49
entire earth, the obligation of those who cause pollution to assume its costs, and the duty to
assess the environmental impact of given projects and works. It set the goal of limiting greenhouse
gas concentration in the atmosphere, in an effort to reverse the trend of global warming. It also
drew up an agenda with an action plan and a convention on biodiversity, and stated principles
regarding forests. Although the summit was a real step forward, and prophetic for its time, its
accords have been poorly implemented, due to the lack of suitable mechanisms for oversight,
periodic review and penalties in cases of non-compliance. The principles which it proclaimed still
await an efficient and flexible means of practical implementation.
168. Among positive experiences in this regard, we might mention, for example, the Basel
Convention on hazardous wastes, with its system of reporting, standards and controls. There is
also the binding Convention on international trade in endangered species of wild fauna and flora,
which includes on-site visits for verifying effective compliance. Thanks to the Vienna Convention
for the protection of the ozone layer and its implementation through the Montreal Protocol and
amendments, the problem of the layer’s thinning seems to have entered a phase of resolution.
169. As far as the protection of biodiversity and issues related to desertification are concerned,
progress has been far less significant. With regard to climate change, the advances have been
regrettably few. Reducing greenhouse gases requires honesty, courage and responsibility, above
all on the part of those countries which are more powerful and pollute the most. The Conference of
the United Nations on Sustainable Development, “Rio+20” (Rio de Janeiro 2012), issued a wide-
ranging but ineffectual outcome document. International negotiations cannot make significant
progress due to positions taken by countries which place their national interests above the global
common good. Those who will have to suffer the consequences of what we are trying to hide will
not forget this failure of conscience and responsibility. Even as this Encyclical was being prepared,
the debate was intensifying. We believers cannot fail to ask God for a positive outcome to the
present discussions, so that future generations will not have to suffer the effects of our ill-advised
delays.
170. Some strategies for lowering pollutant gas emissions call for the internationalization of
environmental costs, which would risk imposing on countries with fewer resources burdensome
commitments to reducing emissions comparable to those of the more industrialized countries.
Imposing such measures penalizes those countries most in need of development. A further
injustice is perpetrated under the guise of protecting the environment. Here also, the poor end up
paying the price. Furthermore, since the effects of climate change will be felt for a long time to
come, even if stringent measures are taken now, some countries with scarce resources will
require assistance in adapting to the effects already being produced, which affect their economies.
In this context, there is a need for common and differentiated responsibilities. As the bishops of
Bolivia have stated, “the countries which have benefited from a high degree of industrialization, at
the cost of enormous emissions of greenhouse gases, have a greater responsibility for providing a
solution to the problems they have caused”.[127]

5.10 Page 50

▲back to top
50
171. The strategy of buying and selling “carbon credits” can lead to a new form of speculation
which would not help reduce the emission of polluting gases worldwide. This system seems to
provide a quick and easy solution under the guise of a certain commitment to the environment, but
in no way does it allow for the radical change which present circumstances require. Rather, it may
simply become a ploy which permits maintaining the excessive consumption of some countries
and sectors.
172. For poor countries, the priorities must be to eliminate extreme poverty and to promote the
social development of their people. At the same time, they need to acknowledge the scandalous
level of consumption in some privileged sectors of their population and to combat corruption more
effectively. They are likewise bound to develop less polluting forms of energy production, but to do
so they require the help of countries which have experienced great growth at the cost of the
ongoing pollution of the planet. Taking advantage of abundant solar energy will require the
establishment of mechanisms and subsidies which allow developing countries access to
technology transfer, technical assistance and financial resources, but in a way which respects their
concrete situations, since “the compatibility of [infrastructures] with the context for which they have
been designed is not always adequately assessed”.[128] The costs of this would be low,
compared to the risks of climate change. In any event, these are primarily ethical decisions, rooted
in solidarity between all peoples.
173. Enforceable international agreements are urgently needed, since local authorities are not
always capable of effective intervention. Relations between states must be respectful of each
other’s sovereignty, but must also lay down mutually agreed means of averting regional disasters
which would eventually affect everyone. Global regulatory norms are needed to impose obligations
and prevent unacceptable actions, for example, when powerful companies or countries dump
contaminated waste or offshore polluting industries in other countries.
174. Let us also mention the system of governance of the oceans. International and regional
conventions do exist, but fragmentation and the lack of strict mechanisms of regulation, control
and penalization end up undermining these efforts. The growing problem of marine waste and the
protection of the open seas represent particular challenges. What is needed, in effect, is an
agreement on systems of governance for the whole range of so-called “global commons”.
175. The same mindset which stands in the way of making radical decisions to reverse the trend
of global warming also stands in the way of achieving the goal of eliminating poverty. A more
responsible overall approach is needed to deal with both problems: the reduction of pollution and
the development of poorer countries and regions. The twenty-first century, while maintaining
systems of governance inherited from the past, is witnessing a weakening of the power of nation
states, chiefly because the economic and financial sectors, being transnational, tends to prevail
over the political. Given this situation, it is essential to devise stronger and more efficiently
organized international institutions, with functionaries who are appointed fairly by agreement

6 Pages 51-60

▲back to top

6.1 Page 51

▲back to top
51
among national governments, and empowered to impose sanctions. As Benedict XVI has affirmed
in continuity with the social teaching of the Church: “To manage the global economy; to revive
economies hit by the crisis; to avoid any deterioration of the present crisis and the greater
imbalances that would result; to bring about integral and timely disarmament, food security and
peace; to guarantee the protection of the environment and to regulate migration: for all this, there
is urgent need of a true world political authority, as my predecessor Blessed John XXIII indicated
some years ago”.[129] Diplomacy also takes on new importance in the work of developing
international strategies which can anticipate serious problems affecting us all.
II. DIALOGUE FOR NEW NATIONAL AND LOCAL POLICIES
176. There are not just winners and losers among countries, but within poorer countries
themselves. Hence different responsibilities need to be identified. Questions related to the
environment and economic development can no longer be approached only from the standpoint of
differences between countries; they also call for greater attention to policies on the national and
local levels.
177. Given the real potential for a misuse of human abilities, individual states can no longer ignore
their responsibility for planning, coordination, oversight and enforcement within their respective
borders. How can a society plan and protect its future amid constantly developing technological
innovations? One authoritative source of oversight and coordination is the law, which lays down
rules for admissible conduct in the light of the common good. The limits which a healthy, mature
and sovereign society must impose are those related to foresight and security, regulatory norms,
timely enforcement, the elimination of corruption, effective responses to undesired side-effects of
production processes, and appropriate intervention where potential or uncertain risks are involved.
There is a growing jurisprudence dealing with the reduction of pollution by business activities. But
political and institutional frameworks do not exist simply to avoid bad practice, but also to promote
best practice, to stimulate creativity in seeking new solutions and to encourage individual or group
initiatives.
178. A politics concerned with immediate results, supported by consumerist sectors of the
population, is driven to produce short-term growth. In response to electoral interests, governments
are reluctant to upset the public with measures which could affect the level of consumption or
create risks for foreign investment. The myopia of power politics delays the inclusion of a far-
sighted environmental agenda within the overall agenda of governments. Thus we forget that “time
is greater than space”,[130] that we are always more effective when we generate processes rather
than holding on to positions of power. True statecraft is manifest when, in difficult times, we uphold
high principles and think of the long-term common good. Political powers do not find it easy to
assume this duty in the work of nation-building.
179. In some places, cooperatives are being developed to exploit renewable sources of energy

6.2 Page 52

▲back to top
52
which ensure local self-sufficiency and even the sale of surplus energy. This simple example
shows that, while the existing world order proves powerless to assume its responsibilities, local
individuals and groups can make a real difference. They are able to instil a greater sense of
responsibility, a strong sense of community, a readiness to protect others, a spirit of creativity and
a deep love for the land. They are also concerned about what they will eventually leave to their
children and grandchildren. These values are deeply rooted in indigenous peoples. Because the
enforcement of laws is at times inadequate due to corruption, public pressure has to be exerted in
order to bring about decisive political action. Society, through non-governmental organizations and
intermediate groups, must put pressure on governments to develop more rigorous regulations,
procedures and controls. Unless citizens control political power – national, regional and municipal
– it will not be possible to control damage to the environment. Local legislation can be more
effective, too, if agreements exist between neighbouring communities to support the same
environmental policies.
180. There are no uniform recipes, because each country or region has its own problems and
limitations. It is also true that political realism may call for transitional measures and technologies,
so long as these are accompanied by the gradual framing and acceptance of binding
commitments. At the same time, on the national and local levels, much still needs to be done,
such as promoting ways of conserving energy. These would include favouring forms of industrial
production with maximum energy efficiency and diminished use of raw materials, removing from
the market products which are less energy efficient or more polluting, improving transport systems,
and encouraging the construction and repair of buildings aimed at reducing their energy
consumption and levels of pollution. Political activity on the local level could also be directed to
modifying consumption, developing an economy of waste disposal and recycling, protecting
certain species and planning a diversified agriculture and the rotation of crops. Agriculture in
poorer regions can be improved through investment in rural infrastructures, a better organization
of local or national markets, systems of irrigation, and the development of techniques of
sustainable agriculture. New forms of cooperation and community organization can be encouraged
in order to defend the interests of small producers and preserve local ecosystems from
destruction. Truly, much can be done!
181. Here, continuity is essential, because policies related to climate change and environmental
protection cannot be altered with every change of government. Results take time and demand
immediate outlays which may not produce tangible effects within any one government’s term. That
is why, in the absence of pressure from the public and from civic institutions, political authorities
will always be reluctant to intervene, all the more when urgent needs must be met. To take up
these responsibilities and the costs they entail, politicians will inevitably clash with the mindset of
short-term gain and results which dominates present-day economics and politics. But if they are
courageous, they will attest to their God-given dignity and leave behind a testimony of selfless
responsibility. A healthy politics is sorely needed, capable of reforming and coordinating
institutions, promoting best practices and overcoming undue pressure and bureaucratic inertia. It

6.3 Page 53

▲back to top
53
should be added, though, that even the best mechanisms can break down when there are no
worthy goals and values, or a genuine and profound humanism to serve as the basis of a noble
and generous society.
III. DIALOGUE AND TRANSPARENCY IN DECISION-MAKING
182. An assessment of the environmental impact of business ventures and projects demands
transparent political processes involving a free exchange of views. On the other hand, the forms of
corruption which conceal the actual environmental impact of a given project, in exchange for
favours, usually produce specious agreements which fail to inform adequately and to allow for full
debate.
183. Environmental impact assessment should not come after the drawing up of a business
proposition or the proposal of a particular policy, plan or programme. It should be part of the
process from the beginning, and be carried out in a way which is interdisciplinary, transparent and
free of all economic or political pressure. It should be linked to a study of working conditions and
possible effects on people’s physical and mental health, on the local economy and on public
safety. Economic returns can thus be forecast more realistically, taking into account potential
scenarios and the eventual need for further investment to correct possible undesired effects. A
consensus should always be reached between the different stakeholders, who can offer a variety
of approaches, solutions and alternatives. The local population should have a special place at the
table; they are concerned about their own future and that of their children, and can consider goals
transcending immediate economic interest. We need to stop thinking in terms of “interventions” to
save the environment in favour of policies developed and debated by all interested parties. The
participation of the latter also entails being fully informed about such projects and their different
risks and possibilities; this includes not just preliminary decisions but also various follow-up
activities and continued monitoring. Honesty and truth are needed in scientific and political
discussions; these should not be limited to the issue of whether or not a particular project is
permitted by law.
184. In the face of possible risks to the environment which may affect the common good now and
in the future, decisions must be made “based on a comparison of the risks and benefits foreseen
for the various possible alternatives”.[131] This is especially the case when a project may lead to a
greater use of natural resources, higher levels of emission or discharge, an increase of refuse, or
significant changes to the landscape, the habitats of protected species or public spaces. Some
projects, if insufficiently studied, can profoundly affect the quality of life of an area due to very
different factors such as unforeseen noise pollution, the shrinking of visual horizons, the loss of
cultural values, or the effects of nuclear energy use. The culture of consumerism, which prioritizes
short-term gain and private interest, can make it easy to rubber-stamp authorizations or to conceal
information.

6.4 Page 54

▲back to top
54
185. In any discussion about a proposed venture, a number of questions need to be asked in
order to discern whether or not it will contribute to genuine integral development. What will it
accomplish? Why? Where? When? How? For whom? What are the risks? What are the costs?
Who will pay those costs and how? In this discernment, some questions must have higher priority.
For example, we know that water is a scarce and indispensable resource and a fundamental right
which conditions the exercise of other human rights. This indisputable fact overrides any other
assessment of environmental impact on a region.
186. The Rio Declaration of 1992 states that “where there are threats of serious or irreversible
damage, lack of full scientific certainty shall not be used as a pretext for postponing cost-effective
measures”[132] which prevent environmental degradation. This precautionary principle makes it
possible to protect those who are most vulnerable and whose ability to defend their interests and
to assemble incontrovertible evidence is limited. If objective information suggests that serious and
irreversible damage may result, a project should be halted or modified, even in the absence of
indisputable proof. Here the burden of proof is effectively reversed, since in such cases objective
and conclusive demonstrations will have to be brought forward to demonstrate that the proposed
activity will not cause serious harm to the environment or to those who inhabit it.
187. This does not mean being opposed to any technological innovations which can bring about
an improvement in the quality of life. But it does mean that profit cannot be the sole criterion to be
taken into account, and that, when significant new information comes to light, a reassessment
should be made, with the involvement of all interested parties. The outcome may be a decision not
to proceed with a given project, to modify it or to consider alternative proposals.
188. There are certain environmental issues where it is not easy to achieve a broad consensus.
Here I would state once more that the Church does not presume to settle scientific questions or to
replace politics. But I am concerned to encourage an honest and open debate so that particular
interests or ideologies will not prejudice the common good.
IV. POLITICS AND ECONOMY IN DIALOGUE FOR HUMAN FULFILMENT
189. Politics must not be subject to the economy, nor should the economy be subject to the
dictates of an efficiency-driven paradigm of technocracy. Today, in view of the common good,
there is urgent need for politics and economics to enter into a frank dialogue in the service of life,
especially human life. Saving banks at any cost, making the public pay the price, foregoing a firm
commitment to reviewing and reforming the entire system, only reaffirms the absolute power of a
financial system, a power which has no future and will only give rise to new crises after a slow,
costly and only apparent recovery. The financial crisis of 2007-08 provided an opportunity to
develop a new economy, more attentive to ethical principles, and new ways of regulating
speculative financial practices and virtual wealth. But the response to the crisis did not include
rethinking the outdated criteria which continue to rule the world. Production is not always rational,

6.5 Page 55

▲back to top
55
and is usually tied to economic variables which assign to products a value that does not
necessarily correspond to their real worth. This frequently leads to an overproduction of some
commodities, with unnecessary impact on the environment and with negative results on regional
economies.[133] The financial bubble also tends to be a productive bubble. The problem of the
real economy is not confronted with vigour, yet it is the real economy which makes diversification
and improvement in production possible, helps companies to function well, and enables small and
medium businesses to develop and create employment.
190. Here too, it should always be kept in mind that “environmental protection cannot be assured
solely on the basis of financial calculations of costs and benefits. The environment is one of those
goods that cannot be adequately safeguarded or promoted by market forces”.[134] Once more, we
need to reject a magical conception of the market, which would suggest that problems can be
solved simply by an increase in the profits of companies or individuals. Is it realistic to hope that
those who are obsessed with maximizing profits will stop to reflect on the environmental damage
which they will leave behind for future generations? Where profits alone count, there can be no
thinking about the rhythms of nature, its phases of decay and regeneration, or the complexity of
ecosystems which may be gravely upset by human intervention. Moreover, biodiversity is
considered at most a deposit of economic resources available for exploitation, with no serious
thought for the real value of things, their significance for persons and cultures, or the concerns and
needs of the poor.
191. Whenever these questions are raised, some react by accusing others of irrationally
attempting to stand in the way of progress and human development. But we need to grow in the
conviction that a decrease in the pace of production and consumption can at times give rise to
another form of progress and development. Efforts to promote a sustainable use of natural
resources are not a waste of money, but rather an investment capable of providing other economic
benefits in the medium term. If we look at the larger picture, we can see that more diversified and
innovative forms of production which impact less on the environment can prove very profitable. It
is a matter of openness to different possibilities which do not involve stifling human creativity and
its ideals of progress, but rather directing that energy along new channels.
192. For example, a path of productive development, which is more creative and better directed,
could correct the present disparity between excessive technological investment in consumption
and insufficient investment in resolving urgent problems facing the human family. It could generate
intelligent and profitable ways of reusing, revamping and recycling, and it could also improve the
energy efficiency of cities. Productive diversification offers the fullest possibilities to human
ingenuity to create and innovate, while at the same time protecting the environment and creating
more sources of employment. Such creativity would be a worthy expression of our most noble
human qualities, for we would be striving intelligently, boldly and responsibly to promote a
sustainable and equitable development within the context of a broader concept of quality of life.
On the other hand, to find ever new ways of despoiling nature, purely for the sake of new

6.6 Page 56

▲back to top
56
consumer items and quick profit, would be, in human terms, less worthy and creative, and more
superficial.
193. In any event, if in some cases sustainable development were to involve new forms of growth,
then in other cases, given the insatiable and irresponsible growth produced over many decades,
we need also to think of containing growth by setting some reasonable limits and even retracing
our steps before it is too late. We know how unsustainable is the behaviour of those who
constantly consume and destroy, while others are not yet able to live in a way worthy of their
human dignity. That is why the time has come to accept decreased growth in some parts of the
world, in order to provide resources for other places to experience healthy growth. Benedict XVI
has said that “technologically advanced societies must be prepared to encourage more sober
lifestyles, while reducing their energy consumption and improving its efficiency”.[135]
194. For new models of progress to arise, there is a need to change “models of global
development”;[136] this will entail a responsible reflection on “the meaning of the economy and its
goals with an eye to correcting its malfunctions and misapplications”.[137] It is not enough to
balance, in the medium term, the protection of nature with financial gain, or the preservation of the
environment with progress. Halfway measures simply delay the inevitable disaster. Put simply, it is
a matter of redefining our notion of progress. A technological and economic development which
does not leave in its wake a better world and an integrally higher quality of life cannot be
considered progress. Frequently, in fact, people’s quality of life actually diminishes – by the
deterioration of the environment, the low quality of food or the depletion of resources – in the midst
of economic growth. In this context, talk of sustainable growth usually becomes a way of
distracting attention and offering excuses. It absorbs the language and values of ecology into the
categories of finance and technocracy, and the social and environmental responsibility of
businesses often gets reduced to a series of marketing and image-enhancing measures.
195. The principle of the maximization of profits, frequently isolated from other considerations,
reflects a misunderstanding of the very concept of the economy. As long as production is
increased, little concern is given to whether it is at the cost of future resources or the health of the
environment; as long as the clearing of a forest increases production, no one calculates the losses
entailed in the desertification of the land, the harm done to biodiversity or the increased pollution.
In a word, businesses profit by calculating and paying only a fraction of the costs involved. Yet
only when “the economic and social costs of using up shared environmental resources are
recognized with transparency and fully borne by those who incur them, not by other peoples or
future generations”,[138] can those actions be considered ethical. An instrumental way of
reasoning, which provides a purely static analysis of realities in the service of present needs, is at
work whether resources are allocated by the market or by state central planning.
196. What happens with politics? Let us keep in mind the principle of subsidiarity, which grants
freedom to develop the capabilities present at every level of society, while also demanding a

6.7 Page 57

▲back to top
57
greater sense of responsibility for the common good from those who wield greater power. Today, it
is the case that some economic sectors exercise more power than states themselves. But
economics without politics cannot be justified, since this would make it impossible to favour other
ways of handling the various aspects of the present crisis. The mindset which leaves no room for
sincere concern for the environment is the same mindset which lacks concern for the inclusion of
the most vulnerable members of society. For “the current model, with its emphasis on success and
self-reliance, does not appear to favour an investment in efforts to help the slow, the weak or the
less talented to find opportunities in life”.[139]
197. What is needed is a politics which is far-sighted and capable of a new, integral and
interdisciplinary approach to handling the different aspects of the crisis. Often, politics itself is
responsible for the disrepute in which it is held, on account of corruption and the failure to enact
sound public policies. If in a given region the state does not carry out its responsibilities, some
business groups can come forward in the guise of benefactors, wield real power, and consider
themselves exempt from certain rules, to the point of tolerating different forms of organized crime,
human trafficking, the drug trade and violence, all of which become very difficult to eradicate. If
politics shows itself incapable of breaking such a perverse logic, and remains caught up in
inconsequential discussions, we will continue to avoid facing the major problems of humanity. A
strategy for real change calls for rethinking processes in their entirety, for it is not enough to
include a few superficial ecological considerations while failing to question the logic which
underlies present-day culture. A healthy politics needs to be able to take up this challenge.
198. Politics and the economy tend to blame each other when it comes to poverty and
environmental degradation. It is to be hoped that they can acknowledge their own mistakes and
find forms of interaction directed to the common good. While some are concerned only with
financial gain, and others with holding on to or increasing their power, what we are left with are
conflicts or spurious agreements where the last thing either party is concerned about is caring for
the environment and protecting those who are most vulnerable. Here too, we see how true it is
that “unity is greater than conflict”.[140]
V. RELIGIONS IN DIALOGUE WITH SCIENCE
199. It cannot be maintained that empirical science provides a complete explanation of life, the
interplay of all creatures and the whole of reality. This would be to breach the limits imposed by its
own methodology. If we reason only within the confines of the latter, little room would be left for
aesthetic sensibility, poetry, or even reason’s ability to grasp the ultimate meaning and purpose of
things.[141] I would add that “religious classics can prove meaningful in every age; they have an
enduring power to open new horizons… Is it reasonable and enlightened to dismiss certain
writings simply because they arose in the context of religious belief?”[142] It would be quite
simplistic to think that ethical principles present themselves purely in the abstract, detached from
any context. Nor does the fact that they may be couched in religious language detract from their

6.8 Page 58

▲back to top
58
value in public debate. The ethical principles capable of being apprehended by reason can always
reappear in different guise and find expression in a variety of languages, including religious
language.
200. Any technical solution which science claims to offer will be powerless to solve the serious
problems of our world if humanity loses its compass, if we lose sight of the great motivations which
make it possible for us to live in harmony, to make sacrifices and to treat others well. Believers
themselves must constantly feel challenged to live in a way consonant with their faith and not to
contradict it by their actions. They need to be encouraged to be ever open to God’s grace and to
draw constantly from their deepest convictions about love, justice and peace. If a mistaken
understanding of our own principles has at times led us to justify mistreating nature, to exercise
tyranny over creation, to engage in war, injustice and acts of violence, we believers should
acknowledge that by so doing we were not faithful to the treasures of wisdom which we have been
called to protect and preserve. Cultural limitations in different eras often affected the perception of
these ethical and spiritual treasures, yet by constantly returning to their sources, religions will be
better equipped to respond to today’s needs.
201. The majority of people living on our planet profess to be believers. This should spur religions
to dialogue among themselves for the sake of protecting nature, defending the poor, and building
networks of respect and fraternity. Dialogue among the various sciences is likewise needed, since
each can tend to become enclosed in its own language, while specialization leads to a certain
isolation and the absolutization of its own field of knowledge. This prevents us from confronting
environmental problems effectively. An open and respectful dialogue is also needed between the
various ecological movements, among which ideological conflicts are not infrequently
encountered. The gravity of the ecological crisis demands that we all look to the common good,
embarking on a path of dialogue which demands patience, self-discipline and generosity, always
keeping in mind that “realities are greater than ideas”.[143]
CHAPTER SIX
ECOLOGICAL EDUCATION AND SPIRITUALITY
202. Many things have to change course, but it is we human beings above all who need to
change. We lack an awareness of our common origin, of our mutual belonging, and of a future to
be shared with everyone. This basic awareness would enable the development of new
convictions, attitudes and forms of life. A great cultural, spiritual and educational challenge stands
before us, and it will demand that we set out on the long path of renewal.
I. TOWARDS A NEW LIFESTYLE
203. Since the market tends to promote extreme consumerism in an effort to sell its products,

6.9 Page 59

▲back to top
59
people can easily get caught up in a whirlwind of needless buying and spending. Compulsive
consumerism is one example of how the techno-economic paradigm affects individuals. Romano
Guardini had already foreseen this: “The gadgets and technics forced upon him by the patterns of
machine production and of abstract planning mass man accepts quite simply; they are the forms of
life itself. To either a greater or lesser degree mass man is convinced that his conformity is both
reasonable and just”.[144] This paradigm leads people to believe that they are free as long as they
have the supposed freedom to consume. But those really free are the minority who wield
economic and financial power. Amid this confusion, postmodern humanity has not yet achieved a
new self-awareness capable of offering guidance and direction, and this lack of identity is a source
of anxiety. We have too many means and only a few insubstantial ends.
204. The current global situation engenders a feeling of instability and uncertainty, which in turn
becomes “a seedbed for collective selfishness”.[145] When people become self-centred and self-
enclosed, their greed increases. The emptier a person’s heart is, the more he or she needs things
to buy, own and consume. It becomes almost impossible to accept the limits imposed by reality. In
this horizon, a genuine sense of the common good also disappears. As these attitudes become
more widespread, social norms are respected only to the extent that they do not clash with
personal needs. So our concern cannot be limited merely to the threat of extreme weather events,
but must also extend to the catastrophic consequences of social unrest. Obsession with a
consumerist lifestyle, above all when few people are capable of maintaining it, can only lead to
violence and mutual destruction.
205. Yet all is not lost. Human beings, while capable of the worst, are also capable of rising above
themselves, choosing again what is good, and making a new start, despite their mental and social
conditioning. We are able to take an honest look at ourselves, to acknowledge our deep
dissatisfaction, and to embark on new paths to authentic freedom. No system can completely
suppress our openness to what is good, true and beautiful, or our God-given ability to respond to
his grace at work deep in our hearts. I appeal to everyone throughout the world not to forget this
dignity which is ours. No one has the right to take it from us.
206. A change in lifestyle could bring healthy pressure to bear on those who wield political,
economic and social power. This is what consumer movements accomplish by boycotting certain
products. They prove successful in changing the way businesses operate, forcing them to
consider their environmental footprint and their patterns of production. When social pressure
affects their earnings, businesses clearly have to find ways to produce differently. This shows us
the great need for a sense of social responsibility on the part of consumers. “Purchasing is always
a moral – and not simply economic – act”.[146] Today, in a word, “the issue of environmental
degradation challenges us to examine our lifestyle”.[147]
207. The Earth Charter asked us to leave behind a period of self-destruction and make a new
start, but we have not as yet developed a universal awareness needed to achieve this. Here, I

6.10 Page 60

▲back to top
60
would echo that courageous challenge: “As never before in history, common destiny beckons us to
seek a new beginning… Let ours be a time remembered for the awakening of a new reverence for
life, the firm resolve to achieve sustainability, the quickening of the struggle for justice and peace,
and the joyful celebration of life”.[148]
208. We are always capable of going out of ourselves towards the other. Unless we do this, other
creatures will not be recognized for their true worth; we are unconcerned about caring for things
for the sake of others; we fail to set limits on ourselves in order to avoid the suffering of others or
the deterioration of our surroundings. Disinterested concern for others, and the rejection of every
form of self-centeredness and self-absorption, are essential if we truly wish to care for our brothers
and sisters and for the natural environment. These attitudes also attune us to the moral imperative
of assessing the impact of our every action and personal decision on the world around us. If we
can overcome individualism, we will truly be able to develop a different lifestyle and bring about
significant changes in society.
II. EDUCATING FOR THE COVENANT BETWEEN HUMANITY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
209. An awareness of the gravity of today’s cultural and ecological crisis must be translated into
new habits. Many people know that our current progress and the mere amassing of things and
pleasures are not enough to give meaning and joy to the human heart, yet they feel unable to give
up what the market sets before them. In those countries which should be making the greatest
changes in consumer habits, young people have a new ecological sensitivity and a generous
spirit, and some of them are making admirable efforts to protect the environment. At the same
time, they have grown up in a milieu of extreme consumerism and affluence which makes it
difficult to develop other habits. We are faced with an educational challenge.
210. Environmental education has broadened its goals. Whereas in the beginning it was mainly
centred on scientific information, consciousness-raising and the prevention of environmental risks,
it tends now to include a critique of the “myths” of a modernity grounded in a utilitarian mindset
(individualism, unlimited progress, competition, consumerism, the unregulated market). It seeks
also to restore the various levels of ecological equilibrium, establishing harmony within ourselves,
with others, with nature and other living creatures, and with God. Environmental education should
facilitate making the leap towards the transcendent which gives ecological ethics its deepest
meaning. It needs educators capable of developing an ethics of ecology, and helping people,
through effective pedagogy, to grow in solidarity, responsibility and compassionate care.
211. Yet this education, aimed at creating an “ecological citizenship”, is at times limited to
providing information, and fails to instil good habits. The existence of laws and regulations is
insufficient in the long run to curb bad conduct, even when effective means of enforcement are
present. If the laws are to bring about significant, long-lasting effects, the majority of the members
of society must be adequately motivated to accept them, and personally transformed to respond.

7 Pages 61-70

▲back to top

7.1 Page 61

▲back to top
61
Only by cultivating sound virtues will people be able to make a selfless ecological commitment. A
person who could afford to spend and consume more but regularly uses less heating and wears
warmer clothes, shows the kind of convictions and attitudes which help to protect the environment.
There is a nobility in the duty to care for creation through little daily actions, and it is wonderful how
education can bring about real changes in lifestyle. Education in environmental responsibility can
encourage ways of acting which directly and significantly affect the world around us, such as
avoiding the use of plastic and paper, reducing water consumption, separating refuse, cooking
only what can reasonably be consumed, showing care for other living beings, using public
transport or car-pooling, planting trees, turning off unnecessary lights, or any number of other
practices. All of these reflect a generous and worthy creativity which brings out the best in human
beings. Reusing something instead of immediately discarding it, when done for the right reasons,
can be an act of love which expresses our own dignity.
212. We must not think that these efforts are not going to change the world. They benefit society,
often unbeknown to us, for they call forth a goodness which, albeit unseen, inevitably tends to
spread. Furthermore, such actions can restore our sense of self-esteem; they can enable us to live
more fully and to feel that life on earth is worthwhile.
213. Ecological education can take place in a variety of settings: at school, in families, in the
media, in catechesis and elsewhere. Good education plants seeds when we are young, and these
continue to bear fruit throughout life. Here, though, I would stress the great importance of the
family, which is “the place in which life – the gift of God – can be properly welcomed and protected
against the many attacks to which it is exposed, and can develop in accordance with what
constitutes authentic human growth. In the face of the so-called culture of death, the family is the
heart of the culture of life”.[149] In the family we first learn how to show love and respect for life;
we are taught the proper use of things, order and cleanliness, respect for the local ecosystem and
care for all creatures. In the family we receive an integral education, which enables us to grow
harmoniously in personal maturity. In the family we learn to ask without demanding, to say “thank
you” as an expression of genuine gratitude for what we have been given, to control our
aggressivity and greed, and to ask forgiveness when we have caused harm. These simple
gestures of heartfelt courtesy help to create a culture of shared life and respect for our
surroundings.
214. Political institutions and various other social groups are also entrusted with helping to raise
people’s awareness. So too is the Church. All Christian communities have an important role to
play in ecological education. It is my hope that our seminaries and houses of formation will provide
an education in responsible simplicity of life, in grateful contemplation of God’s world, and in
concern for the needs of the poor and the protection of the environment. Because the stakes are
so high, we need institutions empowered to impose penalties for damage inflicted on the
environment. But we also need the personal qualities of self-control and willingness to learn from
one another.

7.2 Page 62

▲back to top
62
215. In this regard, “the relationship between a good aesthetic education and the maintenance of a
healthy environment cannot be overlooked”.[150] By learning to see and appreciate beauty, we
learn to reject self-interested pragmatism. If someone has not learned to stop and admire
something beautiful, we should not be surprised if he or she treats everything as an object to be
used and abused without scruple. If we want to bring about deep change, we need to realize that
certain mindsets really do influence our behaviour. Our efforts at education will be inadequate and
ineffectual unless we strive to promote a new way of thinking about human beings, life, society
and our relationship with nature. Otherwise, the paradigm of consumerism will continue to
advance, with the help of the media and the highly effective workings of the market.
III. ECOLOGICAL CONVERSION
216. The rich heritage of Christian spirituality, the fruit of twenty centuries of personal and
communal experience, has a precious contribution to make to the renewal of humanity. Here, I
would like to offer Christians a few suggestions for an ecological spirituality grounded in the
convictions of our faith, since the teachings of the Gospel have direct consequences for our way of
thinking, feeling and living. More than in ideas or concepts as such, I am interested in how such a
spirituality can motivate us to a more passionate concern for the protection of our world. A
commitment this lofty cannot be sustained by doctrine alone, without a spirituality capable of
inspiring us, without an “interior impulse which encourages, motivates, nourishes and gives
meaning to our individual and communal activity”.[151] Admittedly, Christians have not always
appropriated and developed the spiritual treasures bestowed by God upon the Church, where the
life of the spirit is not dissociated from the body or from nature or from worldly realities, but lived in
and with them, in communion with all that surrounds us.
217. “The external deserts in the world are growing, because the internal deserts have become so
vast”.[152] For this reason, the ecological crisis is also a summons to profound interior conversion.
It must be said that some committed and prayerful Christians, with the excuse of realism and
pragmatism, tend to ridicule expressions of concern for the environment. Others are passive; they
choose not to change their habits and thus become inconsistent. So what they all need is an
“ecological conversion”, whereby the effects of their encounter with Jesus Christ become evident
in their relationship with the world around them. Living our vocation to be protectors of God’s
handiwork is essential to a life of virtue; it is not an optional or a secondary aspect of our Christian
experience.
218. In calling to mind the figure of Saint Francis of Assisi, we come to realize that a healthy
relationship with creation is one dimension of overall personal conversion, which entails the
recognition of our errors, sins, faults and failures, and leads to heartfelt repentance and desire to
change. The Australian bishops spoke of the importance of such conversion for achieving
reconciliation with creation: “To achieve such reconciliation, we must examine our lives and
acknowledge the ways in which we have harmed God’s creation through our actions and our

7.3 Page 63

▲back to top
63
failure to act. We need to experience a conversion, or change of heart”.[153]
219. Nevertheless, self-improvement on the part of individuals will not by itself remedy the
extremely complex situation facing our world today. Isolated individuals can lose their ability and
freedom to escape the utilitarian mindset, and end up prey to an unethical consumerism bereft of
social or ecological awareness. Social problems must be addressed by community networks and
not simply by the sum of individual good deeds. This task “will make such tremendous demands of
man that he could never achieve it by individual initiative or even by the united effort of men bred
in an individualistic way. The work of dominating the world calls for a union of skills and a unity of
achievement that can only grow from quite a different attitude”.[154] The ecological conversion
needed to bring about lasting change is also a community conversion.
220. This conversion calls for a number of attitudes which together foster a spirit of generous care,
full of tenderness. First, it entails gratitude and gratuitousness, a recognition that the world is
God’s loving gift, and that we are called quietly to imitate his generosity in self-sacrifice and good
works: “Do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing… and your Father who sees
in secret will reward you” (Mt 6:3-4). It also entails a loving awareness that we are not
disconnected from the rest of creatures, but joined in a splendid universal communion. As
believers, we do not look at the world from without but from within, conscious of the bonds with
which the Father has linked us to all beings. By developing our individual, God-given capacities,
an ecological conversion can inspire us to greater creativity and enthusiasm in resolving the
world’s problems and in offering ourselves to God “as a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable” (Rom
12:1). We do not understand our superiority as a reason for personal glory or irresponsible
dominion, but rather as a different capacity which, in its turn, entails a serious responsibility
stemming from our faith.
221. Various convictions of our faith, developed at the beginning of this Encyclical can help us to
enrich the meaning of this conversion. These include the awareness that each creature reflects
something of God and has a message to convey to us, and the security that Christ has taken unto
himself this material world and now, risen, is intimately present to each being, surrounding it with
his affection and penetrating it with his light. Then too, there is the recognition that God created
the world, writing into it an order and a dynamism that human beings have no right to ignore. We
read in the Gospel that Jesus says of the birds of the air that “not one of them is forgotten before
God” (Lk 12:6). How then can we possibly mistreat them or cause them harm? I ask all Christians
to recognize and to live fully this dimension of their conversion. May the power and the light of the
grace we have received also be evident in our relationship to other creatures and to the world
around us. In this way, we will help nurture that sublime fraternity with all creation which Saint
Francis of Assisi so radiantly embodied.
IV. JOY AND PEACE

7.4 Page 64

▲back to top
64
222. Christian spirituality proposes an alternative understanding of the quality of life, and
encourages a prophetic and contemplative lifestyle, one capable of deep enjoyment free of the
obsession with consumption. We need to take up an ancient lesson, found in different religious
traditions and also in the Bible. It is the conviction that “less is more”. A constant flood of new
consumer goods can baffle the heart and prevent us from cherishing each thing and each
moment. To be serenely present to each reality, however small it may be, opens us to much
greater horizons of understanding and personal fulfilment. Christian spirituality proposes a growth
marked by moderation and the capacity to be happy with little. It is a return to that simplicity which
allows us to stop and appreciate the small things, to be grateful for the opportunities which life
affords us, to be spiritually detached from what we possess, and not to succumb to sadness for
what we lack. This implies avoiding the dynamic of dominion and the mere accumulation of
pleasures.
223. Such sobriety, when lived freely and consciously, is liberating. It is not a lesser life or one
lived with less intensity. On the contrary, it is a way of living life to the full. In reality, those who
enjoy more and live better each moment are those who have given up dipping here and there,
always on the look-out for what they do not have. They experience what it means to appreciate
each person and each thing, learning familiarity with the simplest things and how to enjoy them.
So they are able to shed unsatisfied needs, reducing their obsessiveness and weariness. Even
living on little, they can live a lot, above all when they cultivate other pleasures and find
satisfaction in fraternal encounters, in service, in developing their gifts, in music and art, in contact
with nature, in prayer. Happiness means knowing how to limit some needs which only diminish us,
and being open to the many different possibilities which life can offer.
224. Sobriety and humility were not favourably regarded in the last century. And yet, when there is
a general breakdown in the exercise of a certain virtue in personal and social life, it ends up
causing a number of imbalances, including environmental ones. That is why it is no longer enough
to speak only of the integrity of ecosystems. We have to dare to speak of the integrity of human
life, of the need to promote and unify all the great values. Once we lose our humility, and become
enthralled with the possibility of limitless mastery over everything, we inevitably end up harming
society and the environment. It is not easy to promote this kind of healthy humility or happy
sobriety when we consider ourselves autonomous, when we exclude God from our lives or replace
him with our own ego, and think that our subjective feelings can define what is right and what is
wrong.
225. On the other hand, no one can cultivate a sober and satisfying life without being at peace
with him or herself. An adequate understanding of spirituality consists in filling out what we mean
by peace, which is much more than the absence of war. Inner peace is closely related to care for
ecology and for the common good because, lived out authentically, it is reflected in a balanced
lifestyle together with a capacity for wonder which takes us to a deeper understanding of life.
Nature is filled with words of love, but how can we listen to them amid constant noise, interminable

7.5 Page 65

▲back to top
65
and nerve-wracking distractions, or the cult of appearances? Many people today sense a profound
imbalance which drives them to frenetic activity and makes them feel busy, in a constant hurry
which in turn leads them to ride rough-shod over everything around them. This too affects how
they treat the environment. An integral ecology includes taking time to recover a serene harmony
with creation, reflecting on our lifestyle and our ideals, and contemplating the Creator who lives
among us and surrounds us, whose presence “must not be contrived but found, uncovered”.[155]
226. We are speaking of an attitude of the heart, one which approaches life with serene
attentiveness, which is capable of being fully present to someone without thinking of what comes
next, which accepts each moment as a gift from God to be lived to the full. Jesus taught us this
attitude when he invited us to contemplate the lilies of the field and the birds of the air, or when
seeing the rich young man and knowing his restlessness, “he looked at him with love” (Mk 10:21).
He was completely present to everyone and to everything, and in this way he showed us the way
to overcome that unhealthy anxiety which makes us superficial, aggressive and compulsive
consumers.
227. One expression of this attitude is when we stop and give thanks to God before and after
meals. I ask all believers to return to this beautiful and meaningful custom. That moment of
blessing, however brief, reminds us of our dependence on God for life; it strengthens our feeling of
gratitude for the gifts of creation; it acknowledges those who by their labours provide us with these
goods; and it reaffirms our solidarity with those in greatest need.
V. CIVIC AND POLITICAL LOVE
228. Care for nature is part of a lifestyle which includes the capacity for living together and
communion. Jesus reminded us that we have God as our common Father and that this makes us
brothers and sisters. Fraternal love can only be gratuitous; it can never be a means of repaying
others for what they have done or will do for us. That is why it is possible to love our enemies. This
same gratuitousness inspires us to love and accept the wind, the sun and the clouds, even though
we cannot control them. In this sense, we can speak of a “universal fraternity”.
229. We must regain the conviction that we need one another, that we have a shared
responsibility for others and the world, and that being good and decent are worth it. We have had
enough of immorality and the mockery of ethics, goodness, faith and honesty. It is time to
acknowledge that light-hearted superficiality has done us no good. When the foundations of social
life are corroded, what ensues are battles over conflicting interests, new forms of violence and
brutality, and obstacles to the growth of a genuine culture of care for the environment.
230. Saint Therese of Lisieux invites us to practise the little way of love, not to miss out on a kind
word, a smile or any small gesture which sows peace and friendship. An integral ecology is also
made up of simple daily gestures which break with the logic of violence, exploitation and

7.6 Page 66

▲back to top
66
selfishness. In the end, a world of exacerbated consumption is at the same time a world which
mistreats life in all its forms.
231. Love, overflowing with small gestures of mutual care, is also civic and political, and it makes
itself felt in every action that seeks to build a better world. Love for society and commitment to the
common good are outstanding expressions of a charity which affects not only relationships
between individuals but also “macro-relationships, social, economic and political ones”.[156] That
is why the Church set before the world the ideal of a “civilization of love”.[157] Social love is the
key to authentic development: “In order to make society more human, more worthy of the human
person, love in social life – political, economic and cultural – must be given renewed value,
becoming the constant and highest norm for all activity”.[158] In this framework, along with the
importance of little everyday gestures, social love moves us to devise larger strategies to halt
environmental degradation and to encourage a “culture of care” which permeates all of society.
When we feel that God is calling us to intervene with others in these social dynamics, we should
realize that this too is part of our spirituality, which is an exercise of charity and, as such, matures
and sanctifies us.
232. Not everyone is called to engage directly in political life. Society is also enriched by a
countless array of organizations which work to promote the common good and to defend the
environment, whether natural or urban. Some, for example, show concern for a public place (a
building, a fountain, an abandoned monument, a landscape, a square), and strive to protect,
restore, improve or beautify it as something belonging to everyone. Around these community
actions, relationships develop or are recovered and a new social fabric emerges. Thus, a
community can break out of the indifference induced by consumerism. These actions cultivate a
shared identity, with a story which can be remembered and handed on. In this way, the world, and
the quality of life of the poorest, are cared for, with a sense of solidarity which is at the same time
aware that we live in a common home which God has entrusted to us. These community actions,
when they express self-giving love, can also become intense spiritual experiences.
VI. SACRAMENTAL SIGNS AND THE CELEBRATION OF REST
233. The universe unfolds in God, who fills it completely. Hence, there is a mystical meaning to be
found in a leaf, in a mountain trail, in a dewdrop, in a poor person’s face.[159] The ideal is not only
to pass from the exterior to the interior to discover the action of God in the soul, but also to
discover God in all things. Saint Bonaventure teaches us that “contemplation deepens the more
we feel the working of God’s grace within our hearts, and the better we learn to encounter God in
creatures outside ourselves”.[160]
234. Saint John of the Cross taught that all the goodness present in the realities and experiences
of this world “is present in God eminently and infinitely, or more properly, in each of these sublime
realities is God”.[161] This is not because the finite things of this world are really divine, but

7.7 Page 67

▲back to top
67
because the mystic experiences the intimate connection between God and all beings, and thus
feels that “all things are God”.[162] Standing awestruck before a mountain, he or she cannot
separate this experience from God, and perceives that the interior awe being lived has to be
entrusted to the Lord: “Mountains have heights and they are plentiful, vast, beautiful, graceful,
bright and fragrant. These mountains are what my Beloved is to me. Lonely valleys are quiet,
pleasant, cool, shady and flowing with fresh water; in the variety of their groves and in the sweet
song of the birds, they afford abundant recreation and delight to the senses, and in their solitude
and silence, they refresh us and give rest. These valleys are what my Beloved is to me”.[163]
235. The Sacraments are a privileged way in which nature is taken up by God to become a means
of mediating supernatural life. Through our worship of God, we are invited to embrace the world on
a different plane. Water, oil, fire and colours are taken up in all their symbolic power and
incorporated in our act of praise. The hand that blesses is an instrument of God’s love and a
reflection of the closeness of Jesus Christ, who came to accompany us on the journey of life.
Water poured over the body of a child in Baptism is a sign of new life. Encountering God does not
mean fleeing from this world or turning our back on nature. This is especially clear in the
spirituality of the Christian East. “Beauty, which in the East is one of the best loved names
expressing the divine harmony and the model of humanity transfigured, appears everywhere: in
the shape of a church, in the sounds, in the colours, in the lights, in the scents”.[164] For
Christians, all the creatures of the material universe find their true meaning in the incarnate Word,
for the Son of God has incorporated in his person part of the material world, planting in it a seed of
definitive transformation. “Christianity does not reject matter. Rather, bodiliness is considered in all
its value in the liturgical act, whereby the human body is disclosed in its inner nature as a temple
of the Holy Spirit and is united with the Lord Jesus, who himself took a body for the world’s
salvation”.[165]
236. It is in the Eucharist that all that has been created finds its greatest exaltation. Grace, which
tends to manifest itself tangibly, found unsurpassable expression when God himself became man
and gave himself as food for his creatures. The Lord, in the culmination of the mystery of the
Incarnation, chose to reach our intimate depths through a fragment of matter. He comes not from
above, but from within, he comes that we might find him in this world of ours. In the Eucharist,
fullness is already achieved; it is the living centre of the universe, the overflowing core of love and
of inexhaustible life. Joined to the incarnate Son, present in the Eucharist, the whole cosmos gives
thanks to God. Indeed the Eucharist is itself an act of cosmic love: “Yes, cosmic! Because even
when it is celebrated on the humble altar of a country church, the Eucharist is always in some way
celebrated on the altar of the world”.[166] The Eucharist joins heaven and earth; it embraces and
penetrates all creation. The world which came forth from God’s hands returns to him in blessed
and undivided adoration: in the bread of the Eucharist, “creation is projected towards divinization,
towards the holy wedding feast, towards unification with the Creator himself”.[167] Thus, the
Eucharist is also a source of light and motivation for our concerns for the environment, directing us
to be stewards of all creation.

7.8 Page 68

▲back to top
68
237. On Sunday, our participation in the Eucharist has special importance. Sunday, like the Jewish
Sabbath, is meant to be a day which heals our relationships with God, with ourselves, with others
and with the world. Sunday is the day of the Resurrection, the “first day” of the new creation,
whose first fruits are the Lord’s risen humanity, the pledge of the final transfiguration of all created
reality. It also proclaims “man’s eternal rest in God”.[168] In this way, Christian spirituality
incorporates the value of relaxation and festivity. We tend to demean contemplative rest as
something unproductive and unnecessary, but this is to do away with the very thing which is most
important about work: its meaning. We are called to include in our work a dimension of receptivity
and gratuity, which is quite different from mere inactivity. Rather, it is another way of working,
which forms part of our very essence. It protects human action from becoming empty activism; it
also prevents that unfettered greed and sense of isolation which make us seek personal gain to
the detriment of all else. The law of weekly rest forbade work on the seventh day, “so that your ox
and your donkey may have rest, and the son of your maidservant, and the stranger, may be
refreshed” (Ex 23:12). Rest opens our eyes to the larger picture and gives us renewed sensitivity
to the rights of others. And so the day of rest, centred on the Eucharist, sheds it light on the whole
week, and motivates us to greater concern for nature and the poor.
VII. THE TRINITY AND THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CREATURES
238. The Father is the ultimate source of everything, the loving and self-communicating foundation
of all that exists. The Son, his reflection, through whom all things were created, united himself to
this earth when he was formed in the womb of Mary. The Spirit, infinite bond of love, is intimately
present at the very heart of the universe, inspiring and bringing new pathways. The world was
created by the three Persons acting as a single divine principle, but each one of them performed
this common work in accordance with his own personal property. Consequently, “when we
contemplate with wonder the universe in all its grandeur and beauty, we must praise the whole
Trinity”.[169]
239. For Christians, believing in one God who is trinitarian communion suggests that the Trinity
has left its mark on all creation. Saint Bonaventure went so far as to say that human beings,
before sin, were able to see how each creature “testifies that God is three”. The reflection of the
Trinity was there to be recognized in nature “when that book was open to man and our eyes had
not yet become darkened”.[170] The Franciscan saint teaches us that each creature bears in itself
a specifically Trinitarian structure, so real that it could be readily contemplated if only the human
gaze were not so partial, dark and fragile. In this way, he points out to us the challenge of trying to
read reality in a Trinitarian key.
240. The divine Persons are subsistent relations, and the world, created according to the divine
model, is a web of relationships. Creatures tend towards God, and in turn it is proper to every
living being to tend towards other things, so that throughout the universe we can find any number
of constant and secretly interwoven relationships.[171] This leads us not only to marvel at the

7.9 Page 69

▲back to top
69
manifold connections existing among creatures, but also to discover a key to our own fulfilment.
The human person grows more, matures more and is sanctified more to the extent that he or she
enters into relationships, going out from themselves to live in communion with God, with others
and with all creatures. In this way, they make their own that trinitarian dynamism which God
imprinted in them when they were created. Everything is interconnected, and this invites us to
develop a spirituality of that global solidarity which flows from the mystery of the Trinity.
VIII. QUEEN OF ALL CREATION
241. Mary, the Mother who cared for Jesus, now cares with maternal affection and pain for this
wounded world. Just as her pierced heart mourned the death of Jesus, so now she grieves for the
sufferings of the crucified poor and for the creatures of this world laid waste by human power.
Completely transfigured, she now lives with Jesus, and all creatures sing of her fairness. She is
the Woman, “clothed in the sun, with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve
stars” (Rev 12:1). Carried up into heaven, she is the Mother and Queen of all creation. In her
glorified body, together with the Risen Christ, part of creation has reached the fullness of its
beauty. She treasures the entire life of Jesus in her heart (cf. Lk 2:19,51), and now understands
the meaning of all things. Hence, we can ask her to enable us to look at this world with eyes of
wisdom.
242. At her side in the Holy Family of Nazareth, stands the figure of Saint Joseph. Through his
work and generous presence, he cared for and defended Mary and Jesus, delivering them from
the violence of the unjust by bringing them to Egypt. The Gospel presents Joseph as a just man,
hard-working and strong. But he also shows great tenderness, which is not a mark of the weak but
of those who are genuinely strong, fully aware of reality and ready to love and serve in humility.
That is why he was proclaimed custodian of the universal Church. He too can teach us how to
show care; he can inspire us to work with generosity and tenderness in protecting this world which
God has entrusted to us.
IX. BEYOND THE SUN
243. At the end, we will find ourselves face to face with the infinite beauty of God (cf. 1 Cor 13:12),
and be able to read with admiration and happiness the mystery of the universe, which with us will
share in unending plenitude. Even now we are journeying towards the sabbath of eternity, the new
Jerusalem, towards our common home in heaven. Jesus says: “I make all things new” (Rev 21:5).
Eternal life will be a shared experience of awe, in which each creature, resplendently transfigured,
will take its rightful place and have something to give those poor men and women who will have
been liberated once and for all.
244. In the meantime, we come together to take charge of this home which has been entrusted to
us, knowing that all the good which exists here will be taken up into the heavenly feast. In union

7.10 Page 70

▲back to top
70
with all creatures, we journey through this land seeking God, for “if the world has a beginning and
if it has been created, we must enquire who gave it this beginning, and who was its Creator”.[172]
Let us sing as we go. May our struggles and our concern for this planet never take away the joy of
our hope.
245. God, who calls us to generous commitment and to give him our all, offers us the light and the
strength needed to continue on our way. In the heart of this world, the Lord of life, who loves us so
much, is always present. He does not abandon us, he does not leave us alone, for he has united
himself definitively to our earth, and his love constantly impels us to find new ways forward. Praise
be to him!
*****
246. At the conclusion of this lengthy reflection which has been both joyful and troubling, I propose
that we offer two prayers. The first we can share with all who believe in a God who is the all-
powerful Creator, while in the other we Christians ask for inspiration to take up the commitment to
creation set before us by the Gospel of Jesus.
A prayer for our earth
All-powerful God, you are present in the whole universe
and in the smallest of your creatures.
You embrace with your tenderness all that exists.
Pour out upon us the power of your love,
that we may protect life and beauty.
Fill us with peace, that we may live
as brothers and sisters, harming no one.
O God of the poor,
help us to rescue the abandoned and forgotten of this earth,
so precious in your eyes.
Bring healing to our lives,
that we may protect the world and not prey on it,
that we may sow beauty, not pollution and destruction.
Touch the hearts
of those who look only for gain
at the expense of the poor and the earth.
Teach us to discover the worth of each thing,
to be filled with awe and contemplation,
to recognize that we are profoundly united
with every creature
as we journey towards your infinite light.

8 Pages 71-80

▲back to top

8.1 Page 71

▲back to top
71
We thank you for being with us each day.
Encourage us, we pray, in our struggle
for justice, love and peace.
A Christian prayer in union with creation
Father, we praise you with all your creatures.
They came forth from your all-powerful hand;
they are yours, filled with your presence and your tender love.
Praise be to you!
Son of God, Jesus,
through you all things were made.
You were formed in the womb of Mary our Mother,
you became part of this earth,
and you gazed upon this world with human eyes.
Today you are alive in every creature
in your risen glory.
Praise be to you!
Holy Spirit, by your light
you guide this world towards the Father’s love
and accompany creation as it groans in travail.
You also dwell in our hearts
and you inspire us to do what is good.
Praise be to you!
Triune Lord, wondrous community of infinite love,
teach us to contemplate you
in the beauty of the universe,
for all things speak of you.
Awaken our praise and thankfulness
for every being that you have made.
Give us the grace to feel profoundly joined
to everything that is.
God of love, show us our place in this world
as channels of your love
for all the creatures of this earth,
for not one of them is forgotten in your sight.
Enlighten those who possess power and money

8.2 Page 72

▲back to top
72
that they may avoid the sin of indifference,
that they may love the common good, advance the weak,
and care for this world in which we live.
The poor and the earth are crying out.
O Lord, seize us with your power and light,
help us to protect all life,
to prepare for a better future,
for the coming of your Kingdom
of justice, peace, love and beauty.
Praise be to you!
Amen.
Given in Rome at Saint Peter’s on 24 May, the Solemnity of Pentecost, in the year 2015, the third
of my Pontificate.
Franciscus
[1] Canticle of the Creatures, in Francis of Assisi: Early Documents, vol. 1, New York-London-
Manila, 1999, 113-114.
[2] Apostolic Letter Octogesima Adveniens (14 May 1971), 21: AAS 63 (1971), 416-417.
[3] Address to FAO on the 25th Anniversary of its Institution (16 November 1970), 4: AAS 62
(1970), 833.
[4] Encyclical Letter Redemptor Hominis (4 March 1979), 15: AAS 71 (1979), 287.
[5] Cf. Catechesis (17 January 2001), 4: Insegnamenti 41/1 (2001), 179.
[6] Encyclical Letter Centesimus Annus (1 May 1991), 38: AAS 83 (1991), 841.
[7] Ibid., 58: AAS 83 (1991), p. 863.
[8] JOHN PAUL II, Encyclical Letter Sollicitudo Rei Socialis (30 December 1987), 34: AAS 80
(1988), 559.
[9] Cf. ID., Encyclical Letter Centesimus Annus (1 May 1991), 37: AAS 83 (1991), 840.
[10] Address to the Diplomatic Corps Accredited to the Holy See (8 January 2007): AAS 99

8.3 Page 73

▲back to top
73
(2007), 73.
[11] Encyclical Letter Caritas in Veritate (29 June 2009), 51: AAS 101 (2009), 687.
[12] Address to the Bundestag, Berlin (22 September 2011): AAS 103 (2011), 664.
[13] Address to the Clergy of the Diocese of Bolzano-Bressanone (6 August 2008): AAS 100
(2008), 634.
[14] Message for the Day of Prayer for the Protection of Creation (1 September 2012).
[15] Address in Santa Barbara, California (8 November 1997); cf. JOHN CHRYSSAVGIS, On
Earth as in Heaven: Ecological Vision and Initiatives of Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew, Bronx,
New York, 2012.
[16] Ibid.
[17] Lecture at the Monastery of Utstein, Norway (23 June 2003).
[18] “Global Responsibility and Ecological Sustainability”, Closing Remarks, Halki Summit I,
Istanbul (20 June 2012).
[19] THOMAS OF CELANO, The Life of Saint Francis, I, 29, 81: in Francis of Assisi: Early
Documents, vol. 1, New York-London-Manila, 1999, 251.
[20] The Major Legend of Saint Francis, VIII, 6, in Francis of Assisi: Early Documents, vol. 2, New
York-London-Manila, 2000, 590.
[21] Cf. THOMAS OF CELANO, The Remembrance of the Desire of a Soul, II, 124, 165, in Francis
of Assisi: Early Documents, vol. 2, New York-London-Manila, 2000, 354.
[22] SOUTHERN AFRICAN CATHOLIC BISHOPS’ CONFERENCE, Pastoral Statement on the
Environmental Crisis (5 September 1999).
[23] Cf. Greeting to the Staff of FAO (20 November 2014): AAS 106 (2014), 985.
[24] FIFTH GENERAL CONFERENCE OF THE LATIN AMERICAN AND CARIBBEAN BISHOPS,
Aparecida Document (29 June 2007), 86.
[25] CATHOLIC BISHOPS’ CONFERENCE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Pastoral Letter What is
Happening to our Beautiful Land? (29 January 1988).

8.4 Page 74

▲back to top
74
[26] BOLIVIAN BISHOPS’ CONFERENCE, Pastoral Letter on the Environment and Human
Development in Bolivia El universo, don de Dios para la vida (23 March 2012), 17.
[27] Cf. GERMAN BISHOPS’ CONFERENCE, Commission for Social Issues, Der Klimawandel:
Brennpunkt globaler, intergenerationeller und ökologischer Gerechtigkeit (September 2006), 28-
30.
[28] PONTIFICAL COUNCIL FOR JUSTICE AND PEACE, Compendium of the Social Doctrine of
the Church, 483.
[29] Catechesis (5 June 2013): Insegnamenti 1/1 (2013), 280.
[30] BISHOPS OF THE PATAGONIA-COMAHUE REGION (ARGENTINA), Christmas Message
(December 2009), 2.
[31] UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF CATHOLIC BISHOPS, Global Climate Change: A Plea
for Dialogue, Prudence and the Common Good (15 June 2001).
[32] FIFTH GENERAL CONFERENCE OF THE LATIN AMERICAN AND CARIBBEAN BISHOPS,
Aparecida Document (29 June 2007), 471.
[33] Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii Gaudium (24 November 2013), 56: AAS 105 (2013), 1043.
[34] JOHN PAUL II, Message for the 1990 World Day of Peace, 12: AAS 82 (1990), 154.
[35] ID., Catechesis (17 January 2001), 3: Insegnamenti 24/1 (2001), 178.
[36] JOHN PAUL II, Message for the 1990 World Day of Peace, 15: AAS 82 (1990), 156.
[37] Catechism of the Catholic Church, 357.
[38] Angelus in Osnabrück (Germany) with the disabled, 16 November 1980: Insegnamenti 3/2
(1980), 1232.
[39] BENEDICT XVI, Homily for the Solemn Inauguration of the Petrine Ministry (24 April 2005):
AAS 97 (2005), 711.
[40] Cf. BONAVENTURE, The Major Legend of Saint Francis, VIII, 1, in Francis of Assisi: Early
Documents, vol. 2, New York-London-Manila, 2000, 586.
[41] Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2416.

8.5 Page 75

▲back to top
75
[42] GERMAN BISHOPS’ CONFERENCE, Zukunft der Schöpfung – Zukunft der Menschheit.
Einklärung der Deutschen Bischofskonferenz zu Fragen der Umwelt und der Energieversorgung,
(1980), II, 2.
[43] Catechism of the Catholic Church, 339.
[44] Hom. in Hexaemeron, I, 2, 10: PG 29, 9.
[45] The Divine Comedy, Paradiso, Canto XXXIII, 145.
[46] BENEDICT XVI, Catechesis (9 November 2005), 3: Insegnamenti 1 (2005), 768.
[47] ID., Encyclical Letter Caritas in Veritate (29 June 2009), 51: AAS 101 (2009), 687.
[48] JOHN PAUL II, Catechesis (24 April 1991), 6: Insegnamenti 14 (1991), 856.
[49] The Catechism explains that God wished to create a world which is “journeying towards its
ultimate perfection”, and that this implies the presence of imperfection and physical evil; cf.
Catechism of the Catholic Church, 310.
[50] Cf. SECOND VATICAN ECUMENICAL COUNCIL, Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the
Modern World Gaudium et Spes, 36.
[51] THOMAS AQUINAS, Summa Theologiae, I, q. 104, art. 1 ad 4.
[52] ID., In octo libros Physicorum Aristotelis expositio, Lib. II, lectio 14.
[53] In this horizon we can set the contribution of Fr Teilhard de Chardin; cf. PAUL VI, Address in a
Chemical and Pharmaceutical Plant (24 February 1966): Insegnamenti 4 (1966), 992-993; JOHN
PAUL II, Letter to the Reverend George Coyne (1 June 1988): Insegnamenti 11/2 (1988), 1715;
BENEDICT XVI, Homily for the Celebration of Vespers in Aosta (24 July 2009): Insegnamenti 5/2
(2009), 60.
[54] JOHN PAUL II, Catechesis (30 January 2002),6: Insegnamenti 25/1 (2002), 140.
[55] CANADIAN CONFERENCE OF CATHOLIC BISHOPS, SOCIAL AFFAIRS COMMISSION,
Pastoral Letter You Love All that Exists… All Things are Yours, God, Lover of Life” (4 October
2003), 1.
[56] CATHOLIC BISHOPS’ CONFERENCE OF JAPAN, Reverence for Life. A Message for the
Twenty-First Century (1 January 2000), 89.

8.6 Page 76

▲back to top
76
[57] JOHN PAUL II, Catechesis (26 January 2000), 5: Insegnamenti 23/1 (2000), 123.
[58] ID., Catechesis (2 August 2000), 3: Insegnamenti 23/2 (2000), 112.
[59] PAUL RICOEUR, Philosophie de la Volonté, t. II: Finitude et Culpabilité, Paris, 2009, 216.
[60] Summa Theologiae, I, q. 47, art. 1.
[61] Ibid.
[62] Cf. ibid., art. 2, ad 1; art. 3.
[63] Catechism of the Catholic Church, 340.
[64] Canticle of the Creatures, in Francis of Assisi: Early Documents, New York-London-Manila,
1999, 113-114.
[65] Cf. NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE BISHOPS OF BRAZIL, A Igreja e a Questão
Ecológica, 1992, 53-54.
[66] Ibid., 61.
[67] Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii Gaudium (24 November 2013), 215: AAS 105 (2013), 1109.
[68] Cf. BENEDICT XVI, Encyclical Letter Caritas in Veritate (29 June 2009), 14: AAS 101 (2009),
650.
[69] Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2418.
[70] CONFERENCE OF DOMINICAN BISHOPS, Pastoral Letter Sobre la relación del hombre con
la naturaleza (21 January 1987).
[71] JOHN PAUL II, Encyclical Letter Laborem Exercens (14 September 1981), 19: AAS 73
(1981), 626.
[72] Encyclical Letter Centesimus Annus (1 May 1991), 31: AAS 83 (1991), 831.
[73] Encyclical Letter Sollicitudo Rei Socialis (30 December 1987), 33: AAS 80 (1988), 557.
[74] Address to Indigenous and Rural People, Cuilapán, Mexico (29 January 1979), 6: AAS 71
(1979), 209.

8.7 Page 77

▲back to top
77
[75] Homily at Mass for Farmers, Recife, Brazil (7 July 1980): AAS 72 (1980): AAS 72 (1980), 926.
[76] Cf. Message for the 1990 World Day of Peace, 8: AAS 82 (1990), 152.
[77] PARAGUAYAN BISHOPS’ CONFERENCE, Pastoral Letter El campesino paraguayo y la
tierra (12 June 1983), 2, 4, d.
[78] NEW ZEALAND CATHOLIC BISHOPS CONFERENCE, Statement on Environmental Issues
(1 September 2006).
[79] Encyclical Letter Laborem Exercens (14 September 1981), 27: AAS 73 (1981), 645.
[80] Hence Saint Justin could speak of “seeds of the Word” in the world; cf. II Apologia 8, 1-2; 13,
3-6: PG 6, 457-458, 467.
[81] JOHN PAUL II, Address to Scientists and Representatives of the United Nations University,
Hiroshima (25 February 1981), 3: AAS 73 (1981), 422.
[82] BENEDICT XVI, Encyclical Letter Caritas in Veritate (29 June 2009), 69: AAS 101 (2009),
702.
[83] ROMANO GUARDINI, Das Ende der Neuzeit, 9th ed., Würzburg, 1965, 87 (English: The End
of the Modern World, Wilmington, 1998, 82).
[84] Ibid.
[85] Ibid., 87-88 (The End of the Modern World, 83).
[86] PONTIFICAL COUNCIL FOR JUSTICE AND PEACE, Compendium of the Social Doctrine of
the Church, 462.
[87] ROMANO GUARDINI, Das Ende der Neuzeit, 63-64 (The End of the Modern World, 56).
[88] Ibid., 64 (The End of the Modern World, 56).
[89] Cf. BENEDICT XVI, Encyclical Letter Caritas in Veritate (29 June 2009), 35: AAS 101 (2009),
671.
[90] Ibid., 22: p. 657.
[91] Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii Gaudium (24 November 2013), 231: AAS 105 (2013), 1114.

8.8 Page 78

▲back to top
78
[92] ROMANO GUARDINI, Das Ende der Neuzeit, 63 (The End of the Modern World, 55).
[93] JOHN PAUL II, Encyclical Letter Centesimus Annus (1 May 1991), 38: AAS 83 (1991), 841.
[94] Cf. Love for Creation. An Asian Response to the Ecological Crisis, Declaration of the
Colloquium sponsored by the Federation of Asian Bishops’ Conferences (Tagatay, 31 January-5
February 1993), 3.3.2.
[95] JOHN PAUL II, Encyclical Letter Centesimus Annus (1 May 1991), 37: AAS 83 (1991), 840.
[96] BENEDICT XVI, Message for the 2010 World Day of Peace, 2: AAS 102 (2010), 41.
[97] ID., Encyclical Letter Caritas in Veritate (29 June 2009), 28: AAS 101 (2009), 663.
[98] Cf. VINCENT OF LERINS, Commonitorium Primum, ch. 23: PL 50, 688: “Ut annis scilicet
consolidetur, dilatetur tempore, sublimetur aetate”.
[99] No. 80: AAS 105 (2013), 1053.
[100] SECOND VATICAN ECUMENICAL COUNCIL, Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the
Modern World Gaudium et Spes, 63.
[101] Cf. JOHN PAUL II, Encyclical Letter Centesimus Annus (1 May 1991), 37: AAS 83 (1991),
840.
[102] PAUL VI, Encyclical Letter Populorum Progressio (26 March 1967), 34: AAS 59 (1967), 274.
[103] BENEDICT XVI, Encyclical Letter Caritas in Veritate (29 June 2009), 32: AAS 101 (2009),
666.
[104] Ibid.
[105] Ibid.
[106] Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2417.
[107] Ibid., 2418.
[108] Ibid., 2415.
[109] Message for the 1990 World Day of Peace, 6: AAS 82 (1990), 150.

8.9 Page 79

▲back to top
79
[110] Address to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences (3 October 1981), 3: Insegnamenti 4/2
(1981), 333.
[111] Message for the 1990 World Day of Peace, 7: AAS 82 (1990), 151.
[112] JOHN PAUL II, Address to the 35th General Assembly of the World Medical Association (29
October 1983), 6: AAS 76 (1984), 394.
[113] EPISCOPAL COMMISSION FOR PASTORAL CONCERNS IN ARGENTINA, Una tierra para
todos (June 2005), 19.
[114] Rio Declaration on Environment and Development (14 June 1992), Principle 4.
[115] Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii Gaudium (24 November 2013), 237: AAS 105 (2013), 1116.
[116] BENEDICT XVI, Encyclical Letter Caritas in Veritate (29 June 2009), 51: AAS 101 (2009),
687.
[117] Some authors have emphasized the values frequently found, for example, in the villas,
chabolas or favelas of Latin America: cf. JUAN CARLOS SCANNONE, S.J., “La irrupción del
pobre y la lógica de la gratuidad”, in JUAN CARLOS SCANNONE and MARCELO PERINE (eds.),
Irrupción del pobre y quehacer filosófico. Hacia una nueva racionalidad, Buenos Aires, 1993, 225-
230.
[118] PONTIFICAL COUNCIL FOR JUSTICE AND PEACE, Compendium of the Social Doctrine of
the Church, 482.
[119] Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii Gaudium (24 November 2013), 210: AAS 105 (2013), 1107.
[120] Address to the German Bundestag, Berlin (22 September 2011): AAS 103 (2011), 668.
[121] Catechesis (15 April 2015): L’Osservatore Romano, 16 April 2015, p. 8.
[122] SECOND VATICAN ECUMENICAL COUNCIL, Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the
Modern World Gaudium et Spes, 26.
[123] Cf. Nos. 186-201: AAS 105 (2013), 1098-1105.
[124] PORTUGUESE BISHOPS’ CONFERENCE, Pastoral Letter Responsabilidade Solidária pelo
Bem Comum (15 September 2003), 20.
[125] BENEDICT XVI, Message for the 2010 World Day of Peace, 8: AAS 102 (2010), 45.

8.10 Page 80

▲back to top
80
[126] Rio Declaration on Environment and Development (14 June 1992), Principle 1.
[127] BOLIVIAN BISHOPS’ CONFERENCE, Pastoral Letter on the Environment and Human
Development in Bolivia El universo, don de Dios para la vida (March 2012), 86.
[128] PONTIFICAL COUNCIL FOR JUSTICE AND PEACE, Energy, Justice and Peace, IV, 1,
Vatican City (2014), 53.
[129] BENEDICT XVI, Encyclical Letter Caritas in Veritate (29 June 2009), 67: AAS 101 (2009).
[130] Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii Gaudium (24 November 2013), 222: AAS 105 (2013), 1111.
[131] PONTIFICAL COUNCIL FOR JUSTICE AND PEACE, Compendium of the Social Doctrine of
the Church, 469.
[132] Rio Declaration on the Environment and Development (14 June 1992), Principle 15.
[133] Cf. MEXICAN BISHOPS’ CONFERENCE, EPISCOPAL COMMISSION FOR PASTORAL
AND SOCIAL CONCERNS, Jesucristo, vida y esperanza de los indígenas e campesinos (14
January 2008).
[134] PONTIFICAL COUNCIL FOR JUSTICE AND PEACE, Compendium of the Social Doctrine of
the Church, 470.
[135] Message for the 2010 World Day of Peace, 9: AAS 102 (2010), 46.
[136] Ibid.
[137] Ibid., 5: p. 43.
[138] BENEDICT XVI, Encyclical Letter Caritas in Veritate (29 June 2009), 50: AAS 101 (2009),
686.
[139] Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii Gaudium (24 November 2013), 209: AAS 105 (2013), 1107.
[140] Ibid., 228: AAS 105 (2013), 1113.
[141] Cf. Encyclical Letter Lumen Fidei (29 June 2013), 34: AAS 105 (2013), 577: “Nor is the light
of faith, joined to the truth of love, extraneous to the material world, for love is always lived out in
body and spirit; the light of faith is an incarnate light radiating from the luminous life of Jesus. It
also illumines the material world, trusts its inherent order, and knows that it calls us to an ever
widening path of harmony and understanding. The gaze of science thus benefits from faith: faith

9 Pages 81-90

▲back to top

9.1 Page 81

▲back to top
81
encourages the scientist to remain constantly open to reality in all its inexhaustible richness. Faith
awakens the critical sense by preventing research from being satisfied with its own formulae and
helps it to realize that nature is always greater. By stimulating wonder before the profound mystery
of creation, faith broadens the horizons of reason to shed greater light on the world which
discloses itself to scientific investigation”.
[142] Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii Gaudium (24 November 2013), 256: AAS 105 (2013), 1123.
[143] Ibid., 231: p. 1114.
[144] ROMANO GUARDINI, Das Ende der Neuzeit, 9th edition, Würzburg, 1965, 66-67 (English:
The End of the Modern World, Wilmington, 1998, 60).
[145] JOHN PAUL II, Message for the 1990 World Day of Peace, 1: AAS 82 (1990), 147.
[146] BENEDICT XVI, Encyclical Letter Caritas in Veritate (29 June 2009), 66: AAS 101 (2009),
699.
[147] ID., Message for the 2010 World Day of Peace, 11: AAS 102 (2010), 48.
[148] Earth Charter, The Hague (29 June 2000).
[149] JOHN PAUL II, Encyclical Letter Centesimus Annus (1 May 1991), 39: AAS 83 (1991), 842.
[150] ID., Message for the 1990 World Day of Peace, 14: AAS 82 (1990), 155.
[151] Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii Gaudium (24 Nov 2013), 261: AAS 105 (2013), 1124.
[152] BENEDICT XVI, Homily for the Solemn Inauguration of the Petrine Ministry (24 April 2005):
AAS 97 (2005), 710.
[153] AUSTRALIAN CATHOLIC BISHOPS’ CONFERENCE, A New Earth – The Environmental
Challenge (2002).
[154] ROMANO GUARDINI, Das Ende der Neuzeit, 72 (The End of the Modern World¸ 65-66).
[155] Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii Gaudium (24 November 2013), 71: AAS 105 (2013), 1050.
[156] BENEDICT XVI, Encyclical Letter Caritas in Veritate (29 June 2009) 2: AAS 101 (2009), 642.
[157] PAUL VI, Message for the 1977 World Day of Peace: AAS 68 (1976), 709.

9.2 Page 82

▲back to top
82
[158] PONTIFICAL COUNCIL FOR JUSTICE AND PEACE, Compendium of the Social Doctrine of
the Church, 582.
[159] The spiritual writer Ali al-Khawas stresses from his own experience the need not to put too
much distance between the creatures of the world and the interior experience of God. As he puts
it: “Prejudice should not have us criticize those who seek ecstasy in music or poetry. There is a
subtle mystery in each of the movements and sounds of this world. The initiate will capture what is
being said when the wind blows, the trees sway, water flows, flies buzz, doors creak, birds sing, or
in the sound of strings or flutes, the sighs of the sick, the groans of the afflicted...” (EVA DE
VITRAY-MEYEROVITCH [ed.], Anthologie du soufisme, Paris 1978, 200).
[160] In II Sent., 23, 2, 3.
[161] Cántico Espiritual, XIV, 5.
[162] Ibid.
[163] Ibid., XIV, 6-7.
[164] JOHN PAUL II, Apostolic Letter Orientale Lumen (2 May 1995), 11: AAS 87 (1995), 757.
[165] Ibid.
[166] ID., Encyclical Letter Ecclesia de Eucharistia (17 April 2003), 8: AAS 95 (2003), 438.
[167] BENEDICT XVI, Homily for the Mass of Corpus Domini (15 June 2006): AAS 98 (2006), 513.
[168] Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2175.
[169] JOHN PAUL II, Catechesis (2 August 2000), 4: Insegnamenti 23/2 (2000), 112.
[170] Quaest. Disp. de Myst. Trinitatis, 1, 2 concl.
[171] Cf. THOMAS AQUINAS, Summa Theologiae, I, q. 11, art. 3; q. 21, art. 1, ad 3; q. 47, art. 3.
[172] BASIL THE GREAT, Hom. in Hexaemeron, I, 2, 6: PG 29, 8.
Copyright © Dicastero per la Comunicazione - Libreria Editrice Vaticana