Evident from the very first article is the presence and initiative of the Spirit of the Lord, as also is the motherly
intervention of Mary and the strong emphasis given to the ecclesial aspect which makes us feel inserted in the
heart of the Church and at the service of its mission.
This perspective enlightens us and leads us to face up in a salesian manner to the social and cultural
transformation it poses.
A third new aspect is the explicit and impelling sense of the Founder. The renewed Constitutions direct our
gaze to Don Bosco and lead us to love him in his particular style of sanctification and apostolate: “We study and
imitate him, admiring in him a splendid blending of nature and grace. He lived 'like a man who could see the
unseen”'. Vatican II urged religious to concentrate their attention on the figure of their Founder, as a concrete and
original expression of the many diverse forms of life and sanctity of the Church. From the Church he was born
and for the Church he lived.
Constant reference to Don Bosco is thus seen as “an ecclesial necessity”. Our way of “being Church” is
precisely that of reactivating in time and space the model of the Founder, as though he repeated to us each day:
“Take me for your model, as I take Christ”.
Pope Paul VI in his important Apostolic Exhortation on renewal of religious life (June 1971) emphasized this
aspect very clearly: “The Council rightly insists”, he wrote, “on the obligation of religious to be faithful to the spirit
of their founders, to their evangelical intentions and to the example of their sanctity. In this it finds one of the
principles for the present renewal and one of the most secure criteria for judging what each Institute should
undertake... For while the call of God renews itself and expresses itself in different ways according to changing
circumstances of place and time, it nevertheless requires a certain constancy of orientation.”
This “constancy of orientation”, drawn from Don Bosco, has inspired the redrafting of the Constitutions in
order to revive in us the fervor for “pastoral charity”. If it is true, as Paul VI says in the document already quoted,
that “every human institution is prone to become set in its ways and is threatened by formalism”, and that
“exterior regularity would not be sufficient in itself to generate the worth of a life and its inherent consistency”, it
means that contemplation of the Founder should lead us to enter into his heart so as to understand his gospel
inspiration as the living and permanent sense of our charism.
Deserving of special mention in this connection is the chapter on “the salesian spirit” found in the 1st Part
of the Constitutions as a constituent factor of our identity. It gives shape and life to every aspect of our way of
following the Lord.
From the Foreword down to the last article, through every Part and section, the text manifests the living
heart of our Father: his charism, his spirit, his mission, his pastoral creativity, his capacity for communion, his
religious witness, the manner of his union with God, his formative pedagogy, his brilliance as an organizer, his
fatherly style of animation and government, his inborn desire to remain always with us, as though proclaiming
from the very first page: “I would like to go with you myself, but since I cannot do so these Constitutions will take
my place. Keep them as you would a precious treasure.”
Still another novelty is the adaptation of the Constitutions to the new Code of Canon Law. The fact is that
Vatican II set in motion a series of changes so far-reaching as to require a complete redrafting of the Code. This
has had a very positive consequence for us.
A constitutional text has no longer to conform to a detailed juridical uniformity which could flatten it out and render
it lifeless by a series of detailed norms going into minute details. The Code of Canon Law today wants to see,
and it promotes and safeguards. the traits and characteristics proper to each Institute, which constitute its
spiritual and apostolic heritage. It does give some general principles concerning religious life but provides, and
even requires, that there be the necessary elbow-room for the expression of each Institute's specific spirit. It lays
down, and this is a good thing, that the constitutive principles of a Congregation must be expressed clearly and
precisely; that within it are realized co-responsibility and subsidiarity; that the 'form' of the Institute corresponds to
the genuine desire of the Founder; that the organization of communities at various levels and the manner of
exercise of authority be clearly defined and at the service of its vocational purpose.
In this way the new Code, which can be considered rather as a further Council document, has given incentive
to the fundamentals of a correct autonomy by inviting the Congregation to a careful rewriting of its particular law.
We can say that the new text of the Constitutions and general Regulations conforms well to these
requirements.
Finally the text clarifies and defines the concrete nature and the compass of our 'Rule of Life'. The so-called
particular or proper law of the Congregation “is expressed in the Constitutions, which represent our basic code,
the general Regulations, the deliberations of the general chapter, the general and provincial directories, and in
other decisions made by competent authorities”. The directives given in these documents together constitute our
'Rule of Life'; they guide our daily practice, define the limits of the exercise of authority and spell out exactly how
the gospel path is to be followed.
The GC22 has the special merit of having reorganized all the material in the general Regulations. The
rewritten text follows the same structure as the Constitutions (in the 2nd, 3rd and 4th Parts) thus facilitating its
use. Various articles have been transferred, some gaps have been filled, and a style more in keeping with their
normative nature has been adopted. The result is that the general Regulations now exhibit a quite new
perspective; they flow harmoniously from the Constitutions, for the observance of which they give practical
directives which provide a concrete method of application.
Don Bosco, with his pedagogical insight, gave real importance to method in behavior and activity. The
sense of an updated “religious discipline” is indispensable. It bears witness and gives vital strength to our sincere
membership of the Congregation. There is an urgent need for us to salvage the ascetical, ecclesial and