remains personally separated…, he does not see that the object contains in his regard the demand
(or at least the aspiration) to become what he admires”.9
The contemplation of Christ, therefore, is not an aesthetic diversion; nor is it just a hobby,
nor even an intellectual curiosity; it is rather a never satisfied passion, an urgent need for
knowledge, love and quest: we want to contemplate more fully Christ to whom we want to adhere
more closely, because “to adhere ever more closely to Christ” constitutes the “centre of consecrated
life”.10
We Salesians contemplate Jesus from our own specific standpoint. Our form of life realizes
the apostolic project of Don Bosco: “to be in the Church signs and bearers of the love of God for
young people, especially those who are poor” (C 2); by carrying out this mission “we find our own
way to holiness” (C 2). The salesian mission, which “sets the tenor of our whole life” (C 3), makes
us more “aware of certain aspects of the figure of the Lord” (C 11), and brings it about that our
contemplation of Christ and our Christian activities are permeated by zeal for God and compassion
for the young. We Salesians know, love and follow Jesus, while remaining among young people.
Immersed as we are in the world and in the concerns of the pastoral life, we learn to meet Christ
through those to whom we have been sent (cf. C 95). Our access to Christ passes through the
young. We Salesians cannot think, see, find, love and follow Christ without being surrounded by
youngsters, or at least without being conscious that to them we are sent. Young people are our
mission, “our portion and cup, the heritage that falls to us” (Ps 16, 6). Apart from the young we
cannot contemplate Christ, or at least we cannot see the Christ contemplated by Don Bosco; the
young to whom we have been sent are the place and reason of our Christian experience. This means
that there is a salesian way of contemplating Jesus, and consequently of knowing, loving and
following him.
Since Christology is the systematic reflection on the person and work of Jesus of Nazareth,
the Christ, the Son of God, it could be asked whether we can speak of a “salesian Christology” or
whether Christology, to be authentic, must be without any qualifying adjective.
It is clear that, by its very definition, christological reflection must be faithful to its task,
concerning the comprehending and understanding in faith of the real, concrete and historical person
of Jesus of Nazareth, confessed to be Christ and Son of God. It must also remain faithful to the
manner in which the normative Christian tradition has understood and explained such a figure
through the centuries.
But this fidelity does not exclude different approaches to the person and work of Jesus,
without ever exhausting its richness; the personal mystery of Christ indeed demands it and makes it
inevitable. If it be true that no human person can be defined by a single phrase, nor be fixed by a
single attitude, nor be seen from a single perspective, much more true is this of Jesus, son of Mary
and Son of God, true man and true God. The closer we draw to it, the more we perceive the figure
of Christ as a mystery, Hence the question put by Jesus to his disciples has lost none of its
relevance or urgency, and he continues to put it also to us: “And who do you say that I am?” (Mc
8, 29).
Among the many factors which “diversify” the perspectives and hence multiply the replies to
the christological question may be mentioned:
- the permanent ecclesial profession of faith which, for the past two thousand years, has made use
of a variety of concepts and terminology for the understanding and expression of salvation in
Christ, and in which appear more than the immutability of formulas the commitment to fidelity
of the believers;
9 S. KIRKEGAARD, Esercizio del cristianesimo, in Opere, traduzione a cura di C. FABRO, Sansoni, Firenze, 1972, p.
812
10 CIVCSVA, Starting afresh from Christ, n. 21