We have to be very aware of this temptation as also of the danger of “clericalizing” lay
people. Clericalism, far from giving impetus to various proposals and contributions, little by
little extinguishes the prophetic fire to which the Church is called to bear witness among the
people. It is right to recognise in this fault an over-simpified and partial or even distorted
view, and a conscious non-acceptance of the ecclesiology of communion, that requires the
recognition of the equal dignity of all vocations.
At the same time the strong temptation felt by some lay people is that of wanting to gain the
control and authority for which they reproached the Salesians themselves. It may be one way
of saying consciously or unconsciously: «Our time has come! Now we can command and we
can have the “power”». No good can come of all this, since it is to betray both the charism
and co-responsibility on behalf of those to whom we are sent.
The only possible way will be that of charismatic identity that should always be guaranteed
and ensured, and that shared leadership which depends as much on the capacity of the people
and on the circumstances, as on formation in which are developed a system of
accompaniment beween Salesians and lay people, and a system for the control and
monitoring of the management of the works, of the various roles, and of the financial
arrangements.
2.3.3. Joint Formation of Salesians and lay people28
Starting from the GC23 each Province was asked to have a Lay Project. The GC24 asked for
the drawing up of a Salesians-Lay People Formation Programme29 with contents, definition of
roles, interventions of the Provincials and of the various structures of provincial guidance.
In the last twenty five years many Provinces have developed a variety of plans for the
specific formation of lay people (and sometimes for Salesians and lay people together),
according to their own needs in relation to the mission. The formation of lay people engaged
for the first time in a Salesian work (teachers, educators, tutors, service personnel, social
workers…) has been seen as a real challenge. In some places, in the face of the complexity of
some Salesian centres, a systematic formation process has been developed for those people
who have to provide a service of guidance and coordination: lay directors, coordinators of
pastoral work, administrators, …
It has been pointed out in various interprovincial meetings or during some of the team visits
that great differences exist in the quality and in the progress made in this area. The
differences have been ascribed to the lack of any “central point of reference” at the service of
the whole Congregation, to which the Provinces could turn. In the last General Chapters the
issue was not dealt with definitively even though the problem was raised on several
occasions. The next General Chapter will provide the possibility of saying something about
this or of taking some decisions, if it considers this appropriate.
On the basis of the model of the missionary communion of the Church enriched by the
diversity of the charisms and by greater knowledge of them, we accept the basic principal that
each one needs the other, to exchange the gifts of each specific vocation whether lay or
consecrated. Mutual enrichment requires from everyone the humility to learn, the spirit of
listening and a readiness for better preparation and a programme of high quality formation in
the sharing of the Salesian charism and in the practice of the preventive system; and this both
28 Cf. GC24, 43,55,101,103,138,140.
29 Cf. GC24, 145.