austraLasia #2092
GC26
commissions and their progress
ROME: 11th March 2008 -- Since there are so many
confrères around the world following this Chapter closely -
perhaps more than any other Chapter has ever been followed before,
especially because of the broad service being offered through the
efforts of the Communications sector - now might be a good time to
indicate where it seems to be heading and how it is working.
You would do well to read and re-read (1) the Rector
Major's letter of convocation (2) the Working Document, both available
from the GC26 website. The Assembly voted to accept the working
document (it could have thrown it out and decided to start from scratch
but did not). It also voted to follow the methodology proposed - this
means that other than the handful involved in the Juridical Commission,
every other Chapter member is in a Commission which is working with the
Working Document, which in turn follows the theme and sub-themes
outlined by the RM in AGC394. Commissions meet, then come back into
assembly with their suggestions and re-workings of the Working
Document. An editorial team made up of one appointee from each
commission, then gets to work on these suggestions and re-workings and
their eventual integration into the Working Document, which will in due
course become the final document. There's a back and forth process
between commissions and general assembly to achieve all this.
There is an effort to focus on the practical guidelines
coming out of each nucleus. It has been recognised and emphasised by
the RM anyway that nucleus no. 1(Starting afresh from Don Bosco) runs
across the entire document. Far too early to say what's happening with
this nucleus, but discussion is certainly honing it, fine tuning it and
turning it into something that should be quite powerful, including its
practical side. It may even end up being the conclusion rather than the
beginning of the final document - that is at least one suggestion.
Another interesting suggestion is that the last bit of each nucleus,
the 'Questioning ourselves' rubric in each nucleus, become a tool for
use in communities and be hyped up with graphical presentation to make
it attractive. The 'narrative' idea which we ran the other day, has
been mentioned several times.
Meanwhile the juridical commission is working on
proposals with juridical import - it would be no secret that a new
member has long been mooted for EAO, to boot, MYM. The juridical
commission says it has no objection to that, understands the motives
why (including political, ASEAN-based motives) and has offered an
affirmative opinion. But it is up to the Assembly to vote on
it.
The processes are in place and are running smoothly.
They are demanding especially for some people - those holding 'office'
in each commission have a lot of work to do: president, secretary,
editorial person, reporter to the Assembly. But it seems to be working.
_________________
AustraLasia is an
email
service
for the Salesian Family of Asia Pacific. It also functions
as an
agency for ANS based in
Rome.
For queries please contact admin@bosconet.aust.com
.
Use Bosconet-wiki
to be interactive. RSS feeds - just go to Bosconet, click on austraLasia
2008 in the sidebar. You will see the RSS orange icon in your browser
address bar - add it from there. Avail yourself of the Salesian
Digital
Library
at at http://sdl.sdb.org
Title: australasia 2092
Subject and key words: SDB General GC26 commissions
Date (year): 2008
ID: 2000-2099|2092